That's what a jew, marxist, Muslim, and Christian would all agree on.
That biology could be denied or overcome.
I deny this statement, I think that we should understand nature and take its lessons to heart.
Science has revealed moral truths to is, particularly in the realm of Darwinian-Mendelian evolution by inheritance and natural selection. Especially when you apply the rules of Hamiltonian-Dawkinsian rules of how kinship and selfish genes affect the strategic adaptation of behavioral rules and patterns.
I know people will say they've always been like that but it's gotten worse in this last generation and much, much worse when social media was introduced. Now there are a lot of women that do nothing all day but look for approval on social media.
They are innately and intrinsically shallow.Vapid and vacuous. Not all of them of course but most of them. But then Mother Nature made them that way. I mean if your function is to sit in a corner of the cave breastfeeding...why do you need a sophisticated brain?
It is important to realize that women are like this. But also an error to blame them for it.
This is how women are meant to be. It is what they are supposed to do. So that they fall in line with the men in their lives. So that there can be harmony in the home, and the family can work together towards common goals.
The problem is only that their instincts have been hijacked by hostile actors.
And that men aren't doing anything to eliminate the threat, or regain control of their women.
Yep. It's bad enough that we have to overcome female behaviors like lying. But also their recruited simps like dulcima who will do anything to protect even the most vile females virtue.
True, these qualities are perfectly natural. It’s only when women invert them to place themselves in opposition or competition to men that they, and these qualities become so dangerous.
They’re naturally genetic interlopers, they don’t become adults until they’re FULLY secured to a man they can emulate. The same way they can’t understand and value race consciousness unlit they have a kid. Anything supposed exceptions are just extreme emulation.
There are boys on this site who believed that women's boobs magically stopped working when and easier quicker alternative of cows milk powder became available.
No cunts. Women lie to cover up their ego and publics perception of them.
They can breast feed fine. But it takes ten times longer and it hurts.
Worse, once a crappy mother starts using cows milk to replace human milk. The human milk production rapidly declines in response.
If women cared more about their children they would never touch cows milk.
This. It amazes me we have an entire global population concerned about baby formula instead of how we have naturally fed and raised our children for millions of years. Mom can’t breast feed, she has to go back to work during the first year of the child. How the fuck did we get here!?!?! Abandon your kid for your boss, strong woman. Don’t breast feed and raise your child’s IQ, have this condensed pasteurized milk powder. I have little hope for the masses. Work on your self, pray death is a release from this laughing chaos.
I do think that sometimes there are enough issues that a mother can't feed (wet nurses and all that); but you are absolutely right, i haven't met a "good mother" who couldn't breast feed.
I really love the abortion one too. They come up with like 50 different circumstances and determine who has agency where. Guess who always has agency. The men. So i guess leftists are 75% right (they half think females have agency).
we are on the same page. I would say that in an "ideal" world women who could, would breast feed, and then the demand for supplemental would be low enough donors (modern wet nurse) could cover the deficit.
The only value you think men can gain is from their access to pussy.
You outed yourself.
What a fucking loser.
Pro tip from a man to a boy.
When you become a man, you stop chasing pussy. Pussy chases after you but by now. As a man. You know how little worth pussy is in comparison to your worth as a man.
It's boys like you with nothing to offer who therefor see access to tits as some sort of achievement.
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 07:17:47 ago (+1/-0)
Progressive orthodoxy has it that females bring to decision-making certain skills only they possess as females which is why females should be included in any decision-making panel. Undoubtedly there are females who are brighter than men in the decision-making process and vice-versa but to suggest females have skills over and above those of men in the decision-making process simply because of their femaleness is, in my opinion, which is not a respectful one, garbage.
Wait till you run into one that is a narrcisist on top of all that I think maybe alot of them are becoming worse and worse narccisist due to our fucked up society.
This is an absurd Dangus-level understanding of men and women and it’s a false dichotomy. If I agree that women are more agreeable and socially oriented than men, you claim that this is evidence of a child like naivete of the way the world (i.e. men ) works.
I think that your view of women is heavily shaped by what jews show you women are like. Other women are censored and hidden from view. To some extent, many young women are chimping what they see on jew tube, but how are they any more gullible than you, who believes that this is how women “really are” ?
But where you really go wrong logically is that by inferring that agreeability— or any other traits you view as “bad” women’s traits —are binary at all or are even correlated to femaleness.
Let’s say that the average female craves affection more than the average man. Let’s say she loves attention and will hump the leg of any male that pets her alot and tells her she’s a good girl and gives her treats. Let’s call this stereotypical female opportunistic behavior.
Does that mean the average male is not opportunistic? What does his opportunistic behavior look like? How about fucking every healthy piece of ass thats offered to him? How about giving a trillion dollars to jewish pornagraphers to show him naked ladies? Or drinking alcohol?
There are lot’s other examples I could come up with which are stereotypical male behaviors which are opportunistic (selfish and harmful to the larger society) including many fallacies that males almost exclusively fall for, which lead them to act against the interest of whites.
It is simply that opportunism looks different in males than in females. White males are fighting against white males in the umpteenth pointless jew war in a century. Why? Because they are gullible and dumb, or they like the jew pay. Or both.
But none of these behavioral traits are binary: people are not
agreeable XOR NOT agreeable
or
gullible XOR NOT gullible.
There is a continuous spectrum of gullibility and people may be gullible in one area and not another.
Furthermore opportunism is not correlated to femaleness. Naivity is not correlated to femaleness. Opportunistic strategies vary between males and females, not opportunism itself. Naivity of a given subject matter varies between males and females.
But you just cherry pick because you only care about male priorities (naturally) so you declare females to be incompetent men! Lol. We were built to form a consensus non-violently, not fight to the death over access to the most uteruses! Of course we are more agreeble.
Are hens more childlike than roosters? Are bulls more logical than cows? You are going to have to either make the case for why the female of every species is more “defective” than the male, or explain why humans should for some reason be different in this respect than animals— why human females just evolved to be behaviorally broken and make bad decisions vis a vis men.
Most young women tend to mindlessly imitate what they see on TV, but how is that so different from you, who are tricked into thinking that most young women mindlessly imitate what they see on TV?
Most men are able to reject the sexual advances of most women, there are those men who would accept a random offer to fuck, but those are in the minority. Most of those men are the type that are unable to easily find a partner, the higher your value on the sexual marketplace, or the more satisfied you are with your current relationship status, the more leisure you have to reject sexual offers, for far too many men, they take the offer of sex because that's their only option to get it. You also have to take into account that the sexual selectiveness of women is due to how in demand the average woman is, men have far lower standards compared to women, which means most women can easily get sex if they are open to receiving it. Men are people with a low budget begging for food on the street, women are people with a large budget dining at a buffet. It's got nothing to do with who is hornier.
Pornography is free, you pay nothing for it, and yes, it's use is harmful, but for most men their addiction to porn could be solved by giving them the opportunity to score in real life. The cure to fake sexual experiences is real sexual experience, but for that to happen it's women who have to start shooting for the men that are more in range, they need need curb their expectations and lower their standards. Yes, the men can improve themselves to increase their market value, but rather than this being the requirement to score, how about having them score with a woman who encourages them to improve themselves. For a lot of guys, improving themselves beside the woman they love is a dream come true. Most men who are heavy drinkers are doing so to deal with some form of unresolved trauma or stress, it would be better to deal with the cause rather than just the symptoms, doing that just ensures that he'll move onto the next coping addiction.
I'm not just saying that women are gullible, women often don't even think about what they do, they arent tricked into anything, they just go in blindly and follow the crowd. The comparison here is someone who walks into a glass wall with their eyes open, and someone who walks into an opaque wall with eyes shut.
The problem isn't opportunism, it's having a need for social validation, it's having an apathy for the bigger effects of what one does than the immediate payoff.
I think I have to disagree with the popular idea that women are the ones who are less violent and more cooperative.
Businesses of all men work well, but those of only women crash and burn, woman rulers are far more likely to wags war than male ones, and when placing just men or just women on islands and leaving them to feed for themselves, the men create a peaceful and productive miniature society, while the women spend most of their time either fighting or sulking by themselves. It's men who are the peaceful and cooperative ones, not women. Women just lack the physical ability to enact violence that men naturally posses, and so in most cases where women want violence done, they will get some simp to fight for them. Women will do other things instead of open warfare, which is their substitute to acts of open aggression, and these are even more destructive to group cohesion. The peaceful feminist utopia is founded on assumptions that fly in the face of actual observation.
Every species has its own approach to sexual dimprphosm, in some species the males are bigger, stronger, more dominant, and more matured, in others that role falls to the female, in many others, there is little in the way of dimorphosm between the sexes, comparing humans to other species, we can see where we fall in terms of sexual dimprphic tendency.
Yes, the men can improve themselves to increase their market value, but rather than this being the requirement to score, how about having them score with a woman who encourages them to improve themselves.
I'd expect self-improvement from anyone worth considering at all, if not virtually no need for self-improvement. I suspect women would be similarly averse to lowering their standards, particularly in a sexual sense. Having sex with a person of a lower quality than you'd normally accept doesn't sound attractive in the least.
Would you lower your female requirements to the TruFemCel level? They might be self-described as the lowest of the low, the ugliest, and the most mentally ill, but you could encourage them to improve themselves. I mean, give them an opportunity to score in real life, then they wouldn't have to watch porn and rant about "fucking monster idiotic mentaly abuse sadistic ugly creature tr4sh(men)" on their forum.
men have far lower standards compared to women,
This could be viewed as the source of the problem.
Anyway, it makes sense for the party with the inferior product or service to wish potential clients or customers would lower their standards, but it's a hard sell with people desiring quality.
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 23 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 11:55:23 ago (+23/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 8 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 12:25:59 ago (+8/-0)
I'm not racist.
I'm a Darwinist.
[ + ] Boardallday3
[ - ] Boardallday3 4 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:41:04 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] -1 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:05:56 ago (+0/-1)*
That biology could be denied or overcome.
I deny this statement, I think that we should understand nature and take its lessons to heart.
Science has revealed moral truths to is, particularly in the realm of Darwinian-Mendelian evolution by inheritance and natural selection. Especially when you apply the rules of Hamiltonian-Dawkinsian rules of how kinship and selfish genes affect the strategic adaptation of behavioral rules and patterns.
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 12 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 12:12:24 ago (+13/-1)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 10 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 12:24:59 ago (+10/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:38:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 12:38:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:35:44 ago (+0/-0)
This covers the behaviors of feminine boys
[ + ] FalseRealityCheck
[ - ] FalseRealityCheck 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 23:36:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 12:38:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 7 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 12:45:07 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] letsgetit
[ - ] letsgetit 4 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 13:26:21 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 6 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 13:39:09 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 12:40:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:43:16 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 7 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 10:38:32 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] GloryBeckons
[ - ] GloryBeckons 6 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:34:04 ago (+6/-0)
This is how women are meant to be. It is what they are supposed to do. So that they fall in line with the men in their lives. So that there can be harmony in the home, and the family can work together towards common goals.
The problem is only that their instincts have been hijacked by hostile actors.
And that men aren't doing anything to eliminate the threat, or regain control of their women.
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 3 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 19:00:58 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 22:00:03 ago (+0/-0)
It's bad enough that we have to overcome female behaviors like lying.
But also their recruited simps like dulcima who will do anything to protect even the most vile females virtue.
Together they doomed our civilization
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 00:39:41 ago (+0/-0)
It’s only when women invert them to place themselves in opposition or competition to men that they, and these qualities become so dangerous.
[ + ] the_noticer
[ - ] the_noticer 6 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 12:47:05 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 3 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 23:36:11 ago (+3/-0)
The same way they can’t understand and value race consciousness unlit they have a kid.
Anything supposed exceptions are just extreme emulation.
[ + ] GoldenAgeWhen
[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 4 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 11:43:03 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:39:23 ago (+3/-1)
No cunts. Women lie to cover up their ego and publics perception of them.
They can breast feed fine. But it takes ten times longer and it hurts.
Worse, once a crappy mother starts using cows milk to replace human milk. The human milk production rapidly declines in response.
If women cared more about their children they would never touch cows milk.
[ + ] Hermes
[ - ] Hermes 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 18:03:57 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] GoldenAgeWhen
[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:52:04 ago (+1/-0)
I do think that sometimes there are enough issues that a mother can't feed (wet nurses and all that); but you are absolutely right, i haven't met a "good mother" who couldn't breast feed.
I really love the abortion one too. They come up with like 50 different circumstances and determine who has agency where. Guess who always has agency. The men. So i guess leftists are 75% right (they half think females have agency).
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 20:20:32 ago (+1/-1)
In the old days you would get a wetnurse.
[ + ] GoldenAgeWhen
[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 20:39:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 21:55:07 ago (+1/-1)
I've even known women who simply cannot produce enough milk to feed their babies, so they require formula as a supplement.
This place is going to make a manhater out of me.
[ + ] GoldenAgeWhen
[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 10:40:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 22:02:57 ago (+1/-1)
Did your mum seek medical treatment for unable to produce milk? Nope. She lied and like a simp you believed her.
Your mum found the idea of gifting her kids to be icky. Painful. Hard work. Time consuming.
So she abandoned you to fucking cows milk
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 12:42:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 20:13:00 ago (+1/-1)
And I am not a "boy" on this site so I know how a woman's body functions far better than you.
Some women have difficulty breastfeeding or are unable to at all. It just happens because nature sucks.
The level of woman hatred here is twisted and evil. Good luck, white race. These insane "men" think they can save us.
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 21:58:09 ago (+1/-1)*
Do you know how intelligent men know that your mother is a lying selfish cunt?
If your pos mum had a condition where she couldn't pee or shed tears or poop then she would of been off to doctors where cures awaited to treat her.
Oh look. A so called medical condition. Unable to lactate. But no fucking medicine or treatment plan or doctor visits.
Enabling of female vices is all you and your kind do.
And like a typical redittor you claim that you have to be a snake to know the biology of snakes.
What a fucking retarded argument.
If females couldn't breast feed for reasons. We wouldn't be here. Logic and biology dick head
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 22:06:41 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 05:05:26 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Belrick
[ - ] Belrick 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 19:09:35 ago (+0/-0)
The only value you think men can gain is from their access to pussy.
You outed yourself.
What a fucking loser.
Pro tip from a man to a boy.
When you become a man, you stop chasing pussy. Pussy chases after you but by now. As a man. You know how little worth pussy is in comparison to your worth as a man.
It's boys like you with nothing to offer who therefor see access to tits as some sort of achievement.
[ + ] dulcima
[ - ] dulcima -1 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 19:29:56 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 20:02:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 18:53:42 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:50:04 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 09:53:38 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 07:17:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:37:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 13:49:20 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 11:38:15 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 18:57:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:52:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 1234lkjh
[ - ] 1234lkjh 1 point 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 18:12:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:54:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Version6
[ - ] Version6 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 17:15:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:23:39 ago (+4/-4)
I think that your view of women is heavily shaped by what jews show you women are like. Other women are censored and hidden from view. To some extent, many young women are chimping what they see on jew tube, but how are they any more gullible than you, who believes that this is how women “really are” ?
But where you really go wrong logically is that by inferring that agreeability— or any other traits you view as “bad” women’s traits —are binary at all or are even correlated to femaleness.
Let’s say that the average female craves affection more than the average man. Let’s say she loves attention and will hump the leg of any male that pets her alot and tells her she’s a good girl and gives her treats. Let’s call this stereotypical female opportunistic behavior.
Does that mean the average male is not opportunistic? What does his opportunistic behavior look like? How about fucking every healthy piece of ass thats offered to him? How about giving a trillion dollars to jewish pornagraphers to show him naked ladies? Or drinking alcohol?
There are lot’s other examples I could come up with which are stereotypical male behaviors which are opportunistic (selfish and harmful to the larger society) including many fallacies that males almost exclusively fall for, which lead them to act against the interest of whites.
It is simply that opportunism looks different in males than in females. White males are fighting against white males in the umpteenth pointless jew war in a century. Why? Because they are gullible and dumb, or they like the jew pay. Or both.
But none of these behavioral traits are binary: people are not
There is a continuous spectrum of gullibility and people may be gullible in one area and not another.
Furthermore opportunism is not correlated to femaleness. Naivity is not correlated to femaleness. Opportunistic strategies vary between males and females, not opportunism itself. Naivity of a given subject matter varies between males and females.
But you just cherry pick because you only care about male priorities (naturally) so you declare females to be incompetent men! Lol. We were built to form a consensus non-violently, not fight to the death over access to the most uteruses! Of course we are more agreeble.
Are hens more childlike than roosters? Are bulls more logical than cows? You are going to have to either make the case for why the female of every species is more “defective” than the male, or explain why humans should for some reason be different in this respect than animals— why human females just evolved to be behaviorally broken and make bad decisions vis a vis men.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:35:36 ago (+3/-1)
Most men are able to reject the sexual advances of most women, there are those men who would accept a random offer to fuck, but those are in the minority.
Most of those men are the type that are unable to easily find a partner, the higher your value on the sexual marketplace, or the more satisfied you are with your current relationship status, the more leisure you have to reject sexual offers, for far too many men, they take the offer of sex because that's their only option to get it.
You also have to take into account that the sexual selectiveness of women is due to how in demand the average woman is, men have far lower standards compared to women, which means most women can easily get sex if they are open to receiving it.
Men are people with a low budget begging for food on the street, women are people with a large budget dining at a buffet.
It's got nothing to do with who is hornier.
Pornography is free, you pay nothing for it, and yes, it's use is harmful, but for most men their addiction to porn could be solved by giving them the opportunity to score in real life. The cure to fake sexual experiences is real sexual experience, but for that to happen it's women who have to start shooting for the men that are more in range, they need need curb their expectations and lower their standards.
Yes, the men can improve themselves to increase their market value, but rather than this being the requirement to score, how about having them score with a woman who encourages them to improve themselves.
For a lot of guys, improving themselves beside the woman they love is a dream come true.
Most men who are heavy drinkers are doing so to deal with some form of unresolved trauma or stress, it would be better to deal with the cause rather than just the symptoms, doing that just ensures that he'll move onto the next coping addiction.
I'm not just saying that women are gullible, women often don't even think about what they do, they arent tricked into anything, they just go in blindly and follow the crowd.
The comparison here is someone who walks into a glass wall with their eyes open, and someone who walks into an opaque wall with eyes shut.
The problem isn't opportunism, it's having a need for social validation, it's having an apathy for the bigger effects of what one does than the immediate payoff.
I think I have to disagree with the popular idea that women are the ones who are less violent and more cooperative.
Businesses of all men work well, but those of only women crash and burn, woman rulers are far more likely to wags war than male ones, and when placing just men or just women on islands and leaving them to feed for themselves, the men create a peaceful and productive miniature society, while the women spend most of their time either fighting or sulking by themselves. It's men who are the peaceful and cooperative ones, not women. Women just lack the physical ability to enact violence that men naturally posses, and so in most cases where women want violence done, they will get some simp to fight for them. Women will do other things instead of open warfare, which is their substitute to acts of open aggression, and these are even more destructive to group cohesion. The peaceful feminist utopia is founded on assumptions that fly in the face of actual observation.
Every species has its own approach to sexual dimprphosm, in some species the males are bigger, stronger, more dominant, and more matured, in others that role falls to the female, in many others, there is little in the way of dimorphosm between the sexes, comparing humans to other species, we can see where we fall in terms of sexual dimprphic tendency.
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 20:08:51 ago (+0/-0)
I'd expect self-improvement from anyone worth considering at all, if not virtually no need for self-improvement. I suspect women would be similarly averse to lowering their standards, particularly in a sexual sense. Having sex with a person of a lower quality than you'd normally accept doesn't sound attractive in the least.
Would you lower your female requirements to the TruFemCel level? They might be self-described as the lowest of the low, the ugliest, and the most mentally ill, but you could encourage them to improve themselves. I mean, give them an opportunity to score in real life, then they wouldn't have to watch porn and rant about "fucking monster idiotic mentaly abuse sadistic ugly creature tr4sh(men)" on their forum.
This could be viewed as the source of the problem.
Anyway, it makes sense for the party with the inferior product or service to wish potential clients or customers would lower their standards, but it's a hard sell with people desiring quality.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 08:58:49 ago (+0/-0)
When men can't hot their target, they lower their aim, women just demand that the targets lower themselves instead.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:35:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:13:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:04:45 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 4 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:28:55 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:06:01 ago (+1/-1)
SAD!
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -3 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 14:08:57 ago (+3/-6)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 16:36:20 ago (+2/-0)*
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 18:13:14 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 23, 2022 20:10:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 24, 2022 06:56:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector7
[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.4 yearsMay 25, 2022 02:41:38 ago (+0/-0)