Five does once every three months? What is this? Are they seriously trying to market this vaccine as a perscription?
I know the Rabies vaccine you need four does over the month after getting bitten by an rabid animal. One vaccine on day 1, 3, 7, and 14. That's it!
No reocurring doses to lessen the symptoms. If you need something to lessen the symptoms of the common cold, take 30ml of NyQuil & DayQuil during the morning. Drink water, not Soylent.
Two half doses are normally sufficient unless you are working in a field such as laboratory work with bats. Both doses must be made within two weeks, then a serological assessment is made to determine antibodies. It lasts for 3 years which is approximately the length of time that a specific virus (rabies) takes to mutate. With different viruses having different lengths of time for them to sufficiently change, requiring newly updated vaccines based on the evolved genetic material.
But imagine pharma trying to sell us our continued health as a subscription service, with a product by their own admission only works half the time, for a nominal ten weeks at best and it requires people to have infinite shots from a virus which is statistically less dangerous than the winter flu.
I know the NPCs are dumb as hell, but I'm still shocked that NOBODY I knew who went along with covid the whole time saw this for what it is. Only the people who already got it
It's just creepy because all our lives we've known vaccines to mean one thing, but so readily the masses allow the definition to retroactively be changed. 2 + 2 = 5
That bit of brainwashing looks like it was decades in the making. I think the whole "VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM" thing was mostly a manufactured straw-man the media could display and refute/ridicule for 10 years.
Then the term "anti-vax" gets rolled out over another 10 years, again based purely on the fallacy of attacking critics of one vaccine because some different vaccine isn't as harmful (muh polio). It isn't supposed to make logical sense, it is supposed to conflate and confuse, and the primary goal is to create an unimpeachable label word.
Once the masses start defending a word rather than any tangible item to which it refers, any old thing can be called a vaccine to make it immune to criticism. That it comes in a syringe probably helped create the illusion, though I think they could have pulled it off either way.
Imagine if you could get away with calling a handgun a "vaccine dispenser", it would become unassailable.
[ + ] TheBasedProthean
[ - ] TheBasedProthean 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 14, 2022 14:53:53 ago (+0/-0)
I know the Rabies vaccine you need four does over the month after getting bitten by an rabid animal. One vaccine on day 1, 3, 7, and 14. That's it!
No reocurring doses to lessen the symptoms. If you need something to lessen the symptoms of the common cold, take 30ml of NyQuil & DayQuil during the morning. Drink water, not Soylent.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 14, 2022 16:50:08 ago (+0/-0)
Two half doses are normally sufficient unless you are working in a field such as laboratory work with bats. Both doses must be made within two weeks, then a serological assessment is made to determine antibodies. It lasts for 3 years which is approximately the length of time that a specific virus (rabies) takes to mutate. With different viruses having different lengths of time for them to sufficiently change, requiring newly updated vaccines based on the evolved genetic material.
But imagine pharma trying to sell us our continued health as a subscription service, with a product by their own admission only works half the time, for a nominal ten weeks at best and it requires people to have infinite shots from a virus which is statistically less dangerous than the winter flu.
That is if you even believe their sales pitch.
[ + ] giantprick
[ - ] giantprick 2 points 2.9 yearsJul 14, 2022 13:03:49 ago (+2/-0)
It's just creepy because all our lives we've known vaccines to mean one thing, but so readily the masses allow the definition to retroactively be changed. 2 + 2 = 5
[ + ] SithEmpire
[ - ] SithEmpire 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 14, 2022 14:17:39 ago (+0/-0)
Then the term "anti-vax" gets rolled out over another 10 years, again based purely on the fallacy of attacking critics of one vaccine because some different vaccine isn't as harmful (muh polio). It isn't supposed to make logical sense, it is supposed to conflate and confuse, and the primary goal is to create an unimpeachable label word.
Once the masses start defending a word rather than any tangible item to which it refers, any old thing can be called a vaccine to make it immune to criticism. That it comes in a syringe probably helped create the illusion, though I think they could have pulled it off either way.
Imagine if you could get away with calling a handgun a "vaccine dispenser", it would become unassailable.
[ + ] knightwarrior41
[ - ] knightwarrior41 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 14, 2022 11:52:47 ago (+1/-0)