Sign into an existing account

a) knowledge represents perceivable inspiration...not suggested information (like on TV).

b) nonsense represents "nothing sensed"; which ignores that ones senses respond to everything perceivable.

c) to consent to any suggested information implies wanting or not wanting it; which causes the want versus not want conflict of "reason". Look at the above meme and you have a suggestion (TV) on the right; a choice of not want on the left; and yourself as the viewer of the meme as the choice of want.

d) if one consents to either want or not want any suggested information; then one ignores need (perceivable inspiration) and allows those making the suggestion to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning for both sides reasoning against each other over it. That's how both sides of every conflict are controlled and how the few can use suggestion to cause division (reason) among the consenting many.

or kikery

moral of the story is, people are gonna talk, fuck their opinion