×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
20

The peculiar case of the total disappearance of Roman bankers after 260AD

submitted by BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod to History 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:00:23 ago (+20/-0)     (History)

"Involvement in credit was not held in high regard by the upper end of Roman society. The situation was probably not helped by the large amount of foreigners, namely Greeks and 'Syrians', involved in credit. In fact, in Gaul, the words for banker and Syrian were synonyms. Moreover, the clients of the nummularii, argentarii, and coactores argentarii, did not include the Roman elite, who usually had their own safe deposits and sources of credit (much of it derived from wealth in land). The Roman government relied on taxes to raise revenue. There was no 'national debt'."

Roman bankers disappear from the historical record between 260 and the fourth century. Following its collapse and the Christian takeover of Europe, Jews become the predominant moneylenders in every nation. The Roman Church and Christian elites however retained their wealth in land, until monarchy, lordship and church lands fade from the historical record between 1800 and the twentieth century. With their power removed, the Jewish moneylenders were able to implement their gathered wealth to seize both land and state power, and use this total control to begin replacing the population they held such animosity for.


15 comments block


[ - ] SecretHitler 4 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:08:34 ago (+4/-0)

Wild that it became jew dominated at the same time as Europe became Christian dominated.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod [op] 5 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:12:59 ago (+5/-0)

and the Church always backed the jews up and defended their monopoly thenceforth. it was only ever kings who acted against it, only after their people got sick of it.

'Since the time of the Norman conquest, Jews had been filling a small but vital role in the English economy. Usury by Christians was forbidden at the time by the Church of Rome, but Jews were permitted to act as moneylenders and bankers. That enabled some Jews to amass tremendous wealth, but also earned them enmity,[2] which added to the increasing antisemitic sentiments of the time, due to widespread indebtedness and financial ruin among the gentile population.'

[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:25:29 ago (+1/-0)

Reading that makes my blood boil. Not even because of what the jews did, but thinking about the White people that couldn't and still can't add 2 and 2 together.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:41:05 ago (+1/-0)

they couldn't even read the bible and had no idea what the latin crap the priests said was, so they just had to trust the priests interpretation. they were totally cucked.

[ - ] Kozel 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:14:43 ago (+5/-2)

christianity is a slave religion

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod [op] 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:24:15 ago (+4/-1)

you can see how low iq, irrational, reactive and moblike they are today.. imagine how bad they were back then.

[ - ] Kozel 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 02:21:56 ago (+2/-0)

I don't have to imagine. I see their image in covidiots today. Imagine the gasps of yesteryear when they found out someone was not baptized, compare them to the gasps of today when they find out you are unvax. History repeats.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 06:41:20 ago (+3/-0)

What's been shocking to learn in my life is how high a percentage of the population needs to be led by the nose and craves it. They're actually extremely scared of being in charge of their own lives. They're terrified.

[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:26:40 ago (+1/-0)

Christianity was revenge for Hadrian

[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:18:12 ago (+5/-2)

The spread of Jewish enclaves in Europe are highly correlated with the spread of Christianity.

It's as if the veneration of one particular Jew-God also equates to the protection of all Jews in general.

Ask Ragnar Lodbrok what he thought about borrowing money from Jews.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-07FB2-OwbuY/UbMQUlCAPgI/AAAAAAAAF9w/9he3wsHTwzA/s320/vikingplyndring.jpg

[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 08:04:50 ago (+3/-1)

It is almost as if (((christianity))) is a two millennia old jewish psyop.

[ - ] Panic 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 23:14:37 ago (+1/-0)

Almost?

[ - ] boekanier 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 03:41:43 ago (+1/-0)

That's the question I've been asking myself all my life. Finally I get an answer to that

[ - ] totes_magotes 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 06:51:59 ago (+2/-1)

If you're going to quote things, provide the fucking source.