Sign into an existing account

The war is a sophisticated joint operation between russia and ukraine to bankrupt the u.s. and the european union. This makes sense in light of everything we know, and all the outcomes we've seen unfold.

Zelinsky is a double agent.

"Dirty shirt" theory only works if russia loses, restrengthening the u.s. dollar, and splintering brics. The headwind thats been building into a financial disaster thats so far been narrowly avoided, rushes home, everywhere, all across the globe, leaving the dollar as the last refuge.

This trigger the rest of the world to assume the theory is in play at all, leading to a self-fulfilling scenario.

This will trigger a war between u.s. and china, as china sees its last chance at supplanting the u.s. (or ushering in a multipolar world) vanishing.

China (or the u.s. and china, assuming we are tied at the hip, and theres no reason not to assume that), will use this (limited, or 'fake' war) to solicit aid from russia, attempting to break whats left of russian logistics and russia's economy.

Russia in turn will refuse to provide the necessary aid to china, who they have ostensibly been covertly allied with for some time, thus upsetting the apple cart by changing the outcome of the war in favor of the u.s. This is necessary for a multipolar world, because even if the u.s. loses hegemony, that leaves russia to contend with chinese world ambitions. A scenario where the u.s. loses, leaves the world in a much more precarious position so long as the CCP still exists, as far as russian thinking goes.

Meanwhile, because of the global liquidity retreat to the u.s., the euro will crash, and nations will pull out of it.

If russia capitulates in the ukraine war, the model works and the rest of what I wrote is likely to also be correct as a result.

Russia calling off the world, or negotiating, would also drive a wedge between BRICs and britain, namely india, because india already displayed their disloyalty to the global regime/british/u.s. softpower when they helped russia circumnavigate SWIFT sanctions (as I predicted before).

The u.s., having satisfied it's appetite for war (wrt to defense contractors, public sentiment, etc), wouldn't need one with all
the additional liquidity in play driving up asset prices, and wouldn't rush to a new war either, thus weakening taiwan's leverage
in any potential conflict with china.

China would be forced either by the opportunity itself, or by the shrinking window thereof, to initiate war because of it instead of losing its last card at distracting and pacifying its population indirectly.
The attack would likely come from north korea, a proxy of the CCP, in order to provoke the u.s. into an invasion, thus making us look like the aggressor when china responds by taking taiwan and cutting off the u.s. navy.

Owing to these factors and potential outcomes, if we can say that u.s. hegemony gives way to a multipolar global financial environment under the condition that russia wins--and that this same outcome happens even if russia DOESNT win, then we can conclude this outcome is inevitable.

The question then becomes not if, but when.


Thats all for now.