Sign into an existing account

Same thing it means everytime, Pinky. Burn it all down and start over.

No, I can't tell you where or when the ignition spark will strike. The burning is inevitable though.

I completely agree and @Joe_McCarthy has the answer. Violent revolution is the only way. It starts with "terrorism" aka sabotage of infrastructure/supply lines and guerilla warfare, then insurgency and open warfare. The same as it has been throughout history.

the tree of liberty needs to be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots

a) being aware of suggested (fiction) doesn't represent awareness within perceivable (reality). The "thoroughly corrupt and tyrannical system" represents a suggestion by the few to gain control over the consenting many.

Suggested SYS'TEM, noun (Latin systema) - "an assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole" tempts one to ignore being a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).

Want of change (suggested progressivism) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to being (life) changed (inception towards death), hence being within motion.

b) MONO (singular) POLY (plural)...suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singularity (one) to ignore self.

c) suggested SUIT, noun (Latin sequor) - "following" tempts one to ignore that perceivable L (land) A (air) W (water) demands ones resistance, hence need of shelter; breathing and thirst.

d) exposing the suggested lies of others keeps one within a conflict of reason versus suggested truths...truth (want) vs lies (not want) tempts one to ignore being within change (need).

Within change (inception towards death) one (life) cannot hold onto anything without ignoring motion...those who hold onto suggested truths can be contradicted with suggested lies, hence keeping them distracted within conflicts of reason (truth vs lies aka want vs not want aka belief vs disbelief aka agreement vs disagreement aka good vs evil aka pepsi vs coke aka simpsons vs family guy etc.)

e) one (life) cannot run away from the natural order (inception towards death)...trying to follow (want) or run away (not want) from suggested orders tempts one to keep ignoring the perceivable natural order...which needs to be resisted.


Solution (inception towards death) generates problems (life)...problems struggle to sustain self within solution until being dissolved. This isn't hard to comprehend...it's way too easy to ignore.


Can you discern between each ONE of them? What if suggested dualism (two) tempts one to ignore perceivable units (ones)? Can one really look at two or only at each other one?

If all represents one in energy, then what does "two" represent? What's more than energy? What could exist outside ENERGY (internal/inherent power)?


Resist following (systema) allows one to discern being expression (need) or repression (want) within an impressing system. Want burdens one with temptations; need expresses resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death).

Consenting to suggested represses self with it; while giving those suggesting the power of ones consent to oppress one with it.

Consider understanding aka ones consent to "stand under" what others are suggesting...that represents self inflicted repression (consent) fueling outside oppression (suggestion).


Each one faces (life) the cause (inception towards death)...ignoring this gives others the opportunity to masquerade perceivable reality underneath suggested fiction.

Suggested FACE (surface) tempts one to ignore being core within exterior, hence being able to perceive surrounding from center position. All the suggested faces tempt one to ignore center for surrounding.


Accord (agreement) vs discord (disagreement) implies consent of both sides to a 3rd party suggestion, which contradicts "on its own". All conflicts (reasoning) imply fighting among those who consent over what others are suggesting.

Nature doesn't suggest conflicts...try to apply agreement vs disagreement to breathing and you'll notice that the natural order (forwards motion aka velocity) will force one to breathe (resistance) no matter if one agrees or disagrees.


Change (moving input aka perceivable inspiration) establishes MENT (Latin mentis; mind/memory)...ones consent to suggested information tempts one to mentally hold onto it; while ignoring ongoing change.


Ones continuation (life) requires resisting the only path (inception towards death)...others suggest LOGOS to tempt one to follow; while ignoring to resist perceivable PATHOS, hence all the pathological behavior aka PATHOL'OGY, noun (Greek; passion, suffering and discourse.)


a) the ongoing process of dying...each one is living temporarily within it.

b) being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).

c) solution generates problems...without solution one couldn't experience problems. Problems (choice) can only exist at the center of surrounding solution (balance)...others choose to tempt one from center by suggesting to solve problems, which dissolves oneself when consenting.

Suggested MATH, noun - "a mowing; as in aftermath" tempts one to ignore perceivable addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for offspring) and division (being partial within whole).

Nice effort to make ppl stop trying.
Reminds me of something ppl in tiny hats do.

Violence. Assassinations, to be more blunt.

Money is power. Blood is legacy. Lore is destiny.

You take money from the enemy. You invest it in your family, your community, your kinfolk. You weave a legend to guide and hold it all together, throughout the ages and across generations.

These principles are the foundation of every lasting dynasty, and every successful revolution.

Their absence is at the root of every failed empire and every vanquished uprising.

This is why all forms and movements of "conservatism" are doomed at inception. They get it all backwards. They prefer to only take money from ("do business with") their own. They actively refuse to take money from their enemies. They walk away from positions of power and influence "in protest", as soon as things don't quite go their way, instead of playing the long game. They invest in "converting" outsiders, while neglecting their own. They let the enemy control every narrative, rewrite every history, and even dictate the very words from their own mouths, without meaningful contest or counter. All in the name of "principle".

What principles are these? What good are they, when they inevitably lead to self-destruction?

Even here, people often smugly berate and condemn Hitler, for taking money from jewish bankers and investors, to finance his movement. But why wouldn't he? What sort of fool wouldn't take the enemy's money to turn it against them? A conservative, that's who.

The most interesting thing about the system is that it is a system. It's dependent on high tension lines, cell towers, rail ways, bridges, pipe lines, locks and dams, pumping stations, substations, etc. to maintain control.

Vote harder !

Stop using their money.