Sign into an existing account

Im actually shocked there were no objections from the audience, just support

Well executed, I like this guy

Very good stuff right there. Name the jew, blame the jew, shame the jew, flame the jew.

Got dayum look at his hands, he was shitting bricks but still got through it and got the word out there. Balls of steel.

I’m glad he had one person advocating for his right to free speech but this video is just another example of the agent smith program working perfectly.

Caught this the other day. Good shit

Look at how the sheets of paper were quivering as he started naming them; he was so fucking nervous to point this out despite the glaring truth in front of him.

The psyop is real Lads, and it's damned effective.

STOP NOTICING!!!!

Could he please stop noticing!!

“He’s just saying jew, that’s not derogatory”

“I beg to differ”

Good. We know most are jews, but are they really all dual citizens?

The jews don't control the media the banks or anything it'd a giant conspiracy to hurt us!!!!

Mr woods bank accounts will be frozen

Mr woods will be fired

Mr woods might end up in jail for hate speech

Mr woods will be smeared by the media

But the jews have nothing to do with any of that I'm sure just a (((cohencidence)))

excellent naming, when doing it in public this is the way, be as polite as you can while delivering a "dispassionate" analysis of the situation, not the "actions taken" everyone can see the actions were fucked

it's time to make the sheep see what they refuse to see...grab them by the head and force their eyes open, make them see it if you have to.

based guy

He's going to disappear real soon. This kind of talk is not tolerated in a western society of peace and tolerance.

There are three possible 1A violations when a government entity seeks to restrict speech because it is specifically about jews:

1) General freedom of speech violation - there are some forums where the government is allowed to restrict speech. For example, you aren't allowed to talk in courtrooms unless you are doing a case. Otherwise, the government may not engage in content regulation outside certain circumstances. The most unfavorable type of content restriction is a viewpoint-based restriction. So in this video, there is a viewpoint restriction in that they didn't want him expressing his view that jews are to blame for the covid response. It is not a simple content based restriction since they were obviously talking about covid and his speech fell within a discussion about covid.

2) Freedom of religion - jews are, and have always been, the religious enemies of Christians. Indeed, Jesus himself called them the children of satan in John 8:44. Thus, Christians are restricted in exercising their religion of saving others by showing them that they are being deceived by jews and to instead turn towards the truth (God). Deception being the primary tool of satan, who is the father of lies.

3) Establishment violation - Government generally can't support or restrict one religion over any others. By preventing people from saying anything bad about jews, then they are clearly violating the establishment clause since the government doesn't go to such lengths to defend any other religion. This one can be a bit tricky since jews are basically like Schrodinger's race/religion. It can be either one, but if you are referring to religious jews it is an establishment violation.

Hopefully this becomes a trend.

Washington D.C. = Washington Dual Citizens?

https://gab.com/Leaderoftheusa

On gvid: https://gvid.tv/v/fFaDFOkP

deleted

Capitalizes 'jew'.

Look at this faggot. Capitalizes 'covid'. Why? Fucking why? And 'city council meeting'? Again, why?

What a fucking piece of shit.