Sign into an existing account

a) Sensing implies as perceivable by oneself, while googling implies as suggested by another.

b) Google implies suggested common-ism, hence a few suggesting a centralized search-engine towards consenting many, and consenting (buy) to suggested (sell) implies a deal made.

c) goggle/google...looking through google puts goggle over ones eyes, hence being tricked to view reality through the lens of fiction. Alphabet Inc. aka Latin abecedary implies abracadabra aka spell-craft incorporated (put into the body of something else).


a) Trust implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, while consent implies both wanting and not wanting what others are suggesting. Example...both pro-life and pro-choice consent to suggested abortion, which both sides ignore while fighting each other.

b) Nature doesn't require consent; if utilizes velocity (inception towards death) to force resistance (life) to adapt...consenting to others implies ignoring resistance, while submitting.

c) Ones consent to suggested information by others implies mentally holding onto it. This implies "informed consent" and permits others to weave an "internal net" within ones mind/memory.


Others suggest common-ism and nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to distract one from being center (perception) within surrounding (perceivable). Consenting to suggested "common" or "non" distracts one from sensing perceivable.


a) Watching what others show implies ones consent (buy) to suggested (sell) aka mercantile contract law between sinner falling for temptation and the happy merchant of temptations.

b) "all seeing eye" implies ALL (perceivable) SEEING (to perceive) EYE (I)...which one ignores when watching what others are suggesting.

c) OBSERVE, verb (Latin observo; ob and servo, to keep or hold)...solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) cannot keep anything perceivable, and choosing to hold onto suggested implies burdening self with debt to another.

d) She needs to let go, which implies resisting the wanted temptation to hold onto. Why? Because she wields free will of choice within a balance (need/want) based system.

Want implies ignorance of need, which establishes want vs not want aka imbalance. This imbalance is suggested by others as "reasoning", which implies circular logic aka ouroboros aka snake/reptile/repetition eating its own tail.

Only oneself (choice) can resist (need) temptations (want), while consenting to the suggested choices by others implies shirking of ones response-ability (choice). Ignoring ones choice also establishes "chosen ones" among others.


She wants what others are suggesting; you contradict what others are suggesting, which she perceives as not wanting, hence defending her wants against what she not wants. The trick...she ignores need (perceivable) for want (suggested), which keeps her trapped within a conflict of reason (want vs not want).

The only way out...implication (if/then) instead of reason (want vs not want; true vs false; agree vs deny; belief vs disbelief; yes vs no; google vs duckduckgo etc.)

Tell her that all actions have consequences, and those consequences are a part of life that just have to be dealt with.
The best course of action is the one that you'll regret the least.
Inaction is an action, and is typically the worst. As you still have consequences, but have achieved nothing for it.

Use Google to destroy her position.

When she googles something that disagrees with what you know to be true, Google your position, show her that, then Google her sources and show her where they've been wrong countless times before.

It may not help you win an argument at first, but it plants the seeds and the seeds start growing every time you do this. Eventually, she will stop relying on Google and start relying on trustworthy sources.

Some women are like this. She’s obviously craving a strong decisive man to tell her what to think and what to do. This is your time to shine.

Side note: I am least attracted to my husband when he acts indecisive. It is an uncontrollable feeling of repulsion.