Modern studies have found: Uncircumcised men are more likely to pleasure a woman sexually and less likely to have multiple partners;
A study by K.O’Hara and J.O ‘Hara (1999) (
https://archive.ph/nIQmp) showed that women felt more intimate with men who were uncircumcised and also that women felt more sexual pleasure with men who were uncircumcised.
According to a Danish study, Morten Frisch et al. (2011) (
https://archive.ph/iXRLG) circumcised men were more likely to have >10 sexual partners compared to uncircumcised men. This means circumcised men have more issues maintaining a monogamous relationship.
So not only is circumcision attack on men but also on woman because it affects them negatively too. jews have known this for a very long time now.
[ + ] dosvydanya_freedomz
[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 15:55:39 ago (+4/-0)
also rambam was a piece of jewish shit
[ + ] Puller_of_Noses
[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 13:14:05 ago (+3/-0)
It is also a matriarchy. The jew women are "the man behind the curtain".
Circumcision is a blood ritual involving infant torture and female domination.
The muslims are the same, only they are a patriarchy, so they torture their infant girls instead.
No one that swears allegiance to a foreign government like islam or judaism should ever be granted citizenship in any Western country.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:42:47 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Puller_of_Noses
[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 02:10:38 ago (+0/-0)
From Wiki:
The practice is found in some countries of Africa, Asia and the Middle East, and within their respective diasporas. As of 2023, UNICEF estimates that "at least 200 million girls... in 31 countries"—including Indonesia, Iraq, Yemen, and 27 African countries including Egypt—had been subjected to one or more types of female genital mutilation.[3]
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 06:39:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 19:22:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow [op] 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 05:26:10 ago (+1/-0)*
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 16:31:14 ago (+1/-0)
idolaters: "Four generations suffice, since a man cannot look beyond four
generations of his descendants. One should therefore, in an idolatrous city, kill an
old idolater and his family up to his great-grandchild. It has therefore also been
determined that to the commands of God belongs also the commandment to kill all
the descendants of the idolaters, including small children. We find this command
repeated everywhere in the Pentateuch (Deut. 1 2: 1 6)".
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 12:38:24 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow [op] 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 12:49:04 ago (+3/-1)
Are you saying that circumcision doesn't lessen the sexual pleasure of a man and the sexual pleasure a man can give to a woman? I guess all those women comparing circumcised men with uncircumcised men must be all telling lies right?
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 06:43:43 ago (+1/-0)
No need to deboonk circumcision. Circumcision needs to prove its usefulness.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 21:36:14 ago (+0/-0)
To do so requires personal experience and is not something that can be reported on by the subjects as they will lie, or simply be unable to differentiate the feelings altogether as they are incapable of having a unbiased opinion.
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow [op] 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 05:17:30 ago (+0/-0)*
And that's only part of the problem anyways, genital mutilation of an infant is wrong because not only is a part of the body chopped off without consent, but doing it also days after a boy is born, letting them experience such painful trauma when that trauma in of itself can have long lasting consequences is WRONG. Always wrong. And I am sick of hearing idiots make excuses for it.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 14:50:19 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 16:53:04 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 18:08:41 ago (+1/-0)
Once Jesus had His circuncision (which was completely different from the modern one and involved a one-inch longitudinal cut at the foreskin to mark a man, instead of controlling his sexual urges by mutilation), no other Christian needs to perform any bodily sacrifice that leads to permanent changes to your body. "Christians" that perform mutilation are golems hiding behind the adjective.
[ + ] NukeAmerica
[ - ] NukeAmerica -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 18:18:55 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Razzoriel
[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 19:01:41 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 13:53:54 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 16:53:20 ago (+1/-0)
Dribble: a thin stream of liquid; a trickle.
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 21:38:20 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:40:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FacelessOne
[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:48:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 18:24:24 ago (+1/-0)
Modern kikes are not the Israelites of the Bible and have perverted the covenant and buried it meaning. They understand what the covenant is and purposely encourage it so to spite in God's eye as they bombard the circumcised with sex in every aspect of life.
Basically, if you believe modern kikes represents the Israelites from the Bible then you've never read the Bible or are incapable of using discernment.
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:44:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] allAheadFull
[ - ] allAheadFull 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 15:00:09 ago (+1/-0)
This stat probably arises from the fact that Christians and jews are more likely to have fewer sexual partners for religious reasons. jews probably don't count kid fucking in their reporting.
[ + ] Not_C
[ - ] Not_C 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 19:31:49 ago (+0/-0)
The head of the penis acts like a plunger pulling semen out of the woman.
Removing the foreskin allows the penis to remove more semen.
Mammal's penises are shaped the way they're shaped so that they are more likely to be the one who impregnates the female.
The kikes have always been weak people. Physically and weak as a people in every land they inhabited. Their women were constantly raped and abused.
Circumcising their males did 2 things.
If a Jewish man fucked his wife or daughter after getting raped, his circumcised penis increased the chances of the Jew being the father of the child.
Also, Jewish men could rape the locals of any land they inhabited, and because their sperm is more likely to impregnate, over time the offspring would adopt their features, allowing them to blend in.
Jews weren't trying to limit sexual satisfaction and limit their reproduction.
Jews are nothing more than filthy animals and rapists who were trying to increase the likelihood of them fathering children.