×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
24

12th century scumbag Rabbi Maimonides on why circumcision is performed; To attack male sexuality and to disrupt a healthy sexual relationship with a woman.

submitted by didyouknow to Jews 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 12:24:48 ago (+25/-1)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/sv3wym.png

Modern studies have found: Uncircumcised men are more likely to pleasure a woman sexually and less likely to have multiple partners;

A study by K.O’Hara and J.O ‘Hara (1999) (https://archive.ph/nIQmp) showed that women felt more intimate with men who were uncircumcised and also that women felt more sexual pleasure with men who were uncircumcised.

According to a Danish study, Morten Frisch et al. (2011) (https://archive.ph/iXRLG) circumcised men were more likely to have >10 sexual partners compared to uncircumcised men. This means circumcised men have more issues maintaining a monogamous relationship.

So not only is circumcision attack on men but also on woman because it affects them negatively too. jews have known this for a very long time now.


27 comments block


[ - ] dosvydanya_freedomz 4 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 15:55:39 ago (+4/-0)

the fact of the matter is that american women finds uncut penis ugly due to porn. ask any woman that you know. they just dont like it

also rambam was a piece of jewish shit

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 3 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 13:14:05 ago (+3/-0)

First of all, it's not a religion, it's a homeless government with their chosen god as the moral authority instead of a constitution. That's why jews and muslims can disregard all White laws and feel justified in any criminal act they commit. A "higher authority".

It is also a matriarchy. The jew women are "the man behind the curtain".
Circumcision is a blood ritual involving infant torture and female domination.
The muslims are the same, only they are a patriarchy, so they torture their infant girls instead.

No one that swears allegiance to a foreign government like islam or judaism should ever be granted citizenship in any Western country.

[ - ] Ragnar 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:42:47 ago (+1/-0)

Muslims also circumcisise boys. The only ones mutilating baby girls are Africans. Ask any muzzie who is not an african

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 02:10:38 ago (+0/-0)

You're mostly right.
From Wiki:
The practice is found in some countries of Africa, Asia and the Middle East, and within their respective diasporas. As of 2023, UNICEF estimates that "at least 200 million girls... in 31 countries"—including Indonesia, Iraq, Yemen, and 27 African countries including Egypt—had been subjected to one or more types of female genital mutilation.[3]

[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 06:39:47 ago (+0/-0)

Judaism is a matriarchy because men can't put the women to the sword. They fuck those khazar milker bitches and the jew line continues, now with a little extra shape shifting. The final solution must include the women.

[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 12:38:24 ago (+3/-1)

Studies are all nonsense dribble from the same universities that push climate change. Immigration being positive and race mixing as the future.

[ - ] didyouknow [op] 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 12:49:04 ago (+3/-1)

Oh, they are ALL nonsense? Even the ones proven to be correct such as the one with circumcision? Tell me how circumcision being bad for these reasons is as much nonsense as 'climate change' and 'immigration being positive'?

Are you saying that circumcision doesn't lessen the sexual pleasure of a man and the sexual pleasure a man can give to a woman? I guess all those women comparing circumcised men with uncircumcised men must be all telling lies right?

[ - ] TheYiddler 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 06:43:43 ago (+1/-0)

In this case, evidence must be supplied to prove circumcision is beneficial. Since nearly all research is bullshit, may as well go with the natural approach.

No need to deboonk circumcision. Circumcision needs to prove its usefulness.

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 21:36:14 ago (+0/-0)

You cannot prove this thesis.

To do so requires personal experience and is not something that can be reported on by the subjects as they will lie, or simply be unable to differentiate the feelings altogether as they are incapable of having a unbiased opinion.

[ - ] didyouknow [op] 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 05:17:30 ago (+0/-0)*

It's already proven by the function of the foreskin, the testimonies are nothing but added confirmation. You are just coping.

And that's only part of the problem anyways, genital mutilation of an infant is wrong because not only is a part of the body chopped off without consent, but doing it also days after a boy is born, letting them experience such painful trauma when that trauma in of itself can have long lasting consequences is WRONG. Always wrong. And I am sick of hearing idiots make excuses for it.

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 14:50:19 ago (+0/-0)

Cool story bro.

[ - ] NukeAmerica -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 16:53:04 ago (+1/-2)

He’s a christcuck, they support circumcision.

[ - ] Razzoriel 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 18:08:41 ago (+1/-0)

Jesus sacrificed Himself, so that we do not need to.

Once Jesus had His circuncision (which was completely different from the modern one and involved a one-inch longitudinal cut at the foreskin to mark a man, instead of controlling his sexual urges by mutilation), no other Christian needs to perform any bodily sacrifice that leads to permanent changes to your body. "Christians" that perform mutilation are golems hiding behind the adjective.

[ - ] NukeAmerica -1 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 18:18:55 ago (+0/-1)

Matthew 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 19:01:41 ago (+1/-1)

He fulfilled the Law by sacrificing Himself.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 13:53:54 ago (+1/-0)

Come. No need to send dick pics.

[ - ] Sector2 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 16:53:20 ago (+1/-0)

Drivel: nonsense.

Dribble: a thin stream of liquid; a trickle.

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 21:38:20 ago (+1/-1)

Thanks Grammar Czar!

[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:40:34 ago (+0/-0)

It’s not really grammar he was correcting

[ - ] FacelessOne 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:48:07 ago (+0/-0)

Thanks Doctor Thesaurus!

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 2 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 19:22:35 ago (+2/-0)

That low iq mutt is one of their peak intellectuals LOL. Just look at his physiognomy compared to Aristotle's and you don't even need to read what they wrote to know who's more intelligent.

[ - ] didyouknow [op] 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 05:26:10 ago (+1/-0)*

He's your typical disgusting rabbi. I think he's also the one who said jews should not treat non-jews, the only time it's acceptable is when a jew is absolutely forced to when they are under threat or when they want to do it for the purpose of infiltration like he did as he was the personal physician of Saladin. Which puts everything into perspective when you consider jews were behind the death vax.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 22, 2024 16:31:14 ago (+1/-0)

Maimonides says the following about the commandment of Jehova to destroy all
idolaters: "Four generations suffice, since a man cannot look beyond four
generations of his descendants. One should therefore, in an idolatrous city, kill an
old idolater and his family up to his great-grandchild. It has therefore also been
determined that to the commands of God belongs also the commandment to kill all
the descendants of the idolaters, including small children. We find this command
repeated everywhere in the Pentateuch (Deut. 1 2: 1 6)".

[ - ] allAheadFull 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 15:00:09 ago (+1/-0)

According to a Danish study, Morten Frisch et al. (2011) (https://archive.ph/iXRLG) circumcised men were more likely to have >10 sexual partners compared to uncircumcised men.

This stat probably arises from the fact that Christians and jews are more likely to have fewer sexual partners for religious reasons. jews probably don't count kid fucking in their reporting.

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 18:24:24 ago (+1/-0)

A circumcision is supposed to be a voluntary covenant with God. Not something given to a boy at birth. I assume the purpose is a transition from animal to man. Life is not about sex. Faggots like LGBT whatever would be upset because they are fuckin retards that live like animals and base their entire existence on it. Like a peacock trying to look pretty for the soul purpose of getting fucked.

Modern kikes are not the Israelites of the Bible and have perverted the covenant and buried it meaning. They understand what the covenant is and purposely encourage it so to spite in God's eye as they bombard the circumcised with sex in every aspect of life.

Basically, if you believe modern kikes represents the Israelites from the Bible then you've never read the Bible or are incapable of using discernment.

[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 23:44:09 ago (+0/-0)

Sodomy is not sex

[ - ] Not_C 0 points 1.4 yearsJan 21, 2024 19:31:49 ago (+0/-0)

No, no, no.

The head of the penis acts like a plunger pulling semen out of the woman.
Removing the foreskin allows the penis to remove more semen.
Mammal's penises are shaped the way they're shaped so that they are more likely to be the one who impregnates the female.

The kikes have always been weak people. Physically and weak as a people in every land they inhabited. Their women were constantly raped and abused.

Circumcising their males did 2 things.
If a Jewish man fucked his wife or daughter after getting raped, his circumcised penis increased the chances of the Jew being the father of the child.
Also, Jewish men could rape the locals of any land they inhabited, and because their sperm is more likely to impregnate, over time the offspring would adopt their features, allowing them to blend in.

Jews weren't trying to limit sexual satisfaction and limit their reproduction.

Jews are nothing more than filthy animals and rapists who were trying to increase the likelihood of them fathering children.