Wildfires when it's snowing!? Seriously?
I would be less willing to believe if this didn't also fit in very nicely with every other facet of the WEF's declared war on our food supply.
Biden went off script and mentioned having "the right roof" on your house. Okay. Then tell us, what does the "right roof" look like?
Would it look something like this?:
https://mobileimages.lowes.com/productimages/8fd7d13d-2e81-4232-8648-c586ce10ff7a/47417091.jpg![]()
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 19:19:35 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 10, 2024 00:08:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:24:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 5 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:38:48 ago (+5/-0)
The most intense spectrum is the ultraviolet spectrum. This would include the color blue. This means objects that are blue will reflect this energy instead of absorb it.
The fact that blue roofs exist in the midst of these fires prove that the fires were caused by ultraviolet rays. What caused these ultraviolet rays? Well it's no secret that they have DEW's that do just that. Condense ultraviolet rays down to a laser beam capable of burning objects that aren't reflecting the ultraviolet spectrum.
A laser can be made with any spectrum of light, but ultraviolet is the most intense.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 -2 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:44:14 ago (+0/-2)
This is not proof of anything, whether "blue roofs exist" or not.
"Q" was a psyop, and the only true statement that account made was "you're watching a show".
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:55:13 ago (+2/-1)
So? If that's the case then it sounds like a tool used to discredit truth. So I would ask what the fuck Q has to do with objective evidence? There is clearly footage and photographs of the aftermath showing blue roofs and other objects like umbrellas that are blue seemingly untouched. There is a science behind this. You and your crazy Q conspiracy is irrelevant.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 18:57:37 ago (+1/-0)
The whole "DEWs used to burn a path across California for the bullet train" is how that meme started. There is zero 'science' to it, just hysterical claims of space lasers.
Can you show documentation these 'space lasers' exist, with specs showing their capability?
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 3 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 19:15:28 ago (+4/-1)*
And that is ALL I am going to say about THAT. Period. I stopped once at Ft. Leavenworth (on my way elsewhere) to fill my gas tank and get something to eat, and that is as close as I have any desire to get.
(And in response to anyone who feels an overwhelming need to call bullshit, I would first ask: Do you have access to a Titan 80-300 Cubed transmission electron microscope (TEM)? Because the level of my concern about what you may, or may not believe can only be detected on a quantum level, and I would want to to be absolutely certain that you can fully grasp it first.)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:12:26 ago (+1/-0)
Who the fuck said anything about space lasers? A DEW isn't in outer space you dumb fuck.
https://everydayconcerned.net/directed-energy-weapon-dew-documents/
And if you're going to pretend like the government doesn't openly brag about their DEW technology then you're obviously a faggot kike shill. It also explains why you have to attach Q to a basic observation. I have to disbelieve my own eyes because Q said it was true. Fuckin kikes.
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 4 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 18:23:29 ago (+4/-0)*
Funny how after all this time, they STILL don't seem to have ANY arson suspects yet?
Let this be a lesson to the "new guys". If you're going to do something so massive that everybody is going to demand answers, like, say, oh, I don't know, assasinate JFK? Have your fucking "Oswald" lined up FIRST.
This kind of silly half-assed shit would have gotten you put on the Tristan da Cunha desk back in the old days.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 3 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 18:32:53 ago (+4/-1)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 19:07:48 ago (+1/-1)
We're nearing the end of the rainy season in California, but in the fall I could take matches out in the hills and start a fire with little chance of being identified. We have tons of fires once it starts getting hot and dry. Had them before satellites existed too.
The DEW meme appears to lack credibility and purpose, except as some sort of psyop to paint 'right wingers' as fruitcakes. If there's any actual evidence, I'd like to see it.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:13:45 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 20:08:08 ago (+0/-2)
I assure you. We don't need DEWs.
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:13:36 ago (+1/-0)
"Hey, I invented a $3 trillion dollar machine that reaches down and stabs people."
US Military: "Did you say only $4 trillion? We'll take six of them."
[ + ] frankenham
[ - ] frankenham 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 23:05:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 10, 2024 00:03:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] frankenham
[ - ] frankenham 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 11, 2024 18:15:55 ago (+0/-0)
DEW's are a show of force. This is what happens when you don't comply.. next we'll hit the center of the metropolitan and use our media to twist the blame onto you.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:27:31 ago (+0/-0)
What's more likely the truth is that DEW's are legit and you're using Q to discredit the idea. Q is the new Alex Jones right? So ridiculous that any truth coming from this source would be considered ridiculous.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:37:40 ago (+0/-0)*
The one commonality about the nuts around here is their opposition to anything that tends to segue into actionable violence. There are glowniggers and then there are ignorant people - but they serve the same do nothing agenda.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 23:17:36 ago (+1/-0)
What about the video and photographic evidence of blue materials not being subject to the destruction? This phenomenon can easily be repeated with ultraviolet lasers. It's not a secret or conspiracy. The objects that are melting have a direct energy beam focused on them. It's not starting a fire that just happens to burn hot enough to melt that shit. It's literally being affected by a direct energy beam. That's why patio umbrellas that happen to be blue can survive. They didn't survive next to a fire hot enough to melt metal. They survive next to a piece of metal being melted by a direct energy beam.
I don't understand where you're coming from with DEW's. Are you saying they don't exist or that they didn't cause the wildfires? Because they do exist. That would be pretty retarded to claim they didn't. Even nerds on YouTube that are into science and lasers make small models of them.
So you think recognizing that DEWs were used is part of a do nothing agenda? I don't understand how the fuck you come to that conclusion. Lol.
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 10, 2024 03:09:03 ago (+0/-0)
"What do you think happened? We didn't have anything to do with it. You can point to evidence and connect the dots all day and still not be able to prove anything in court, and even if you did, there's STILL nothing you can do about it. Shalom."