☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
22

Directed Energy Weapons In Texas Wildfires?

submitted by BulletStopper to whatever 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 14:33:28 ago (+23/-1)     (www.youtube.com)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Pz9gvdvWmU

Wildfires when it's snowing!? Seriously?

I would be less willing to believe if this didn't also fit in very nicely with every other facet of the WEF's declared war on our food supply.

Biden went off script and mentioned having "the right roof" on your house. Okay. Then tell us, what does the "right roof" look like?

Would it look something like this?:
https://mobileimages.lowes.com/productimages/8fd7d13d-2e81-4232-8648-c586ce10ff7a/47417091.jpg


22 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy -2 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 20:08:08 ago (+0/-2)

Stupid conspiracy theories are some of the regime's best material. A do nothing psyop if there ever was one.

I assure you. We don't need DEWs.

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:13:36 ago (+1/-0)

I tend to agree. I don't dispute the reasonableness of motivations to develop a class of weapons like this, but it does seem odd to deploy them in the situations that are being suggested lately. Using this kind of weapon to cause wildfires would be like standing on the bank of a river and deciding you need to a build a really expensive machine to transport a paper sailboat downhill. Fires have a way of self-perpetuating. You just start them in the right place under the right conditions.

"Hey, I invented a $3 trillion dollar machine that reaches down and stabs people."

US Military: "Did you say only $4 trillion? We'll take six of them."

[ - ] frankenham 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 23:05:29 ago (+1/-0)

Not a coincidence that it occurs at the same time Texas is standing up to the federal backed invasion

[ - ] CHIRO 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 10, 2024 00:03:48 ago (+0/-0)

It absolutely is suspicious, but it can be done with regular old arson, too. It's just a lot cheaper to send some hobos out to start fires in a dry field than it is to target-shoot from a satellite in orbit around the planet.

[ - ] frankenham 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 11, 2024 18:15:55 ago (+0/-0)

I'd pay some hard earned shekels to watch you start a wildfire in the middle of winter when everything's under a layer of snow.

DEW's are a show of force. This is what happens when you don't comply.. next we'll hit the center of the metropolitan and use our media to twist the blame onto you.

[ - ] McNasty 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:27:31 ago (+0/-0)

When you say "we" do you mean kikes. As for a psyop, it's a hell of a psyop to go around burning up cities and leaving blue objects remain just so you faggots can fuck with people. Lol.

What's more likely the truth is that DEW's are legit and you're using Q to discredit the idea. Q is the new Alex Jones right? So ridiculous that any truth coming from this source would be considered ridiculous.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:37:40 ago (+0/-0)*

By "we" I mean dissidents. Anyone here can go out and start wildfires tomorrow. These sorts of kook theories have the effect of 'othering' terrorist attacks and associating them with hostiles to prevent dissident terrorist attacks. That this sort of thing has the smell of being conducive to fedgov interests is obvious. The FBI's number one priority is to prevent terrorist attacks. In the case of arson particularly dangerous attacks as they are very destructive and very hard to stop.

The one commonality about the nuts around here is their opposition to anything that tends to segue into actionable violence. There are glowniggers and then there are ignorant people - but they serve the same do nothing agenda.

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 23:17:36 ago (+1/-0)

wildfires

What about the video and photographic evidence of blue materials not being subject to the destruction? This phenomenon can easily be repeated with ultraviolet lasers. It's not a secret or conspiracy. The objects that are melting have a direct energy beam focused on them. It's not starting a fire that just happens to burn hot enough to melt that shit. It's literally being affected by a direct energy beam. That's why patio umbrellas that happen to be blue can survive. They didn't survive next to a fire hot enough to melt metal. They survive next to a piece of metal being melted by a direct energy beam.

I don't understand where you're coming from with DEW's. Are you saying they don't exist or that they didn't cause the wildfires? Because they do exist. That would be pretty retarded to claim they didn't. Even nerds on YouTube that are into science and lasers make small models of them.

Do nothing agenda?

So you think recognizing that DEWs were used is part of a do nothing agenda? I don't understand how the fuck you come to that conclusion. Lol.

[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 10, 2024 03:09:03 ago (+0/-0)

There is nothing that the globohomopedos controlling clownworld love more than standing right in front of a burning house with the empty gas can in one hand and a pack of matches in the other, smile right in your face and say:

"What do you think happened? We didn't have anything to do with it. You can point to evidence and connect the dots all day and still not be able to prove anything in court, and even if you did, there's STILL nothing you can do about it. Shalom."

[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 19:19:35 ago (+1/-1)

jEwiSh sPaCe lAz0rZ!!!

[ - ] TheNoticing 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 10, 2024 00:08:41 ago (+0/-0)

Some kike really downvoated this.

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:24:45 ago (+0/-0)

Why do people believe in DEWs being used to start fires?

[ - ] McNasty 5 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:38:48 ago (+5/-0)

Objects colors are due to the fact that they reflect certain spectrums of light. Light is energy. The more energy an object absorbs, the hotter it gets. This is why black shirts are hotter in the sun compared to white shirts.

The most intense spectrum is the ultraviolet spectrum. This would include the color blue. This means objects that are blue will reflect this energy instead of absorb it.

The fact that blue roofs exist in the midst of these fires prove that the fires were caused by ultraviolet rays. What caused these ultraviolet rays? Well it's no secret that they have DEW's that do just that. Condense ultraviolet rays down to a laser beam capable of burning objects that aren't reflecting the ultraviolet spectrum.

A laser can be made with any spectrum of light, but ultraviolet is the most intense.

[ - ] Sector2 -2 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:44:14 ago (+0/-2)

The fact that blue roofs exist in the midst of these fires prove that the fires were caused by ultraviolet rays.

This is not proof of anything, whether "blue roofs exist" or not.

"Q" was a psyop, and the only true statement that account made was "you're watching a show".

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 17:55:13 ago (+2/-1)

"Q" was a psyop

So? If that's the case then it sounds like a tool used to discredit truth. So I would ask what the fuck Q has to do with objective evidence? There is clearly footage and photographs of the aftermath showing blue roofs and other objects like umbrellas that are blue seemingly untouched. There is a science behind this. You and your crazy Q conspiracy is irrelevant.

[ - ] Sector2 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 18:57:37 ago (+1/-0)

Blue umbrellas made of flammable fabric in a fire remaining unburned? What material are the blue roofs that remained unburned made of? Sounds like those blue ceramic tiles.

The whole "DEWs used to burn a path across California for the bullet train" is how that meme started. There is zero 'science' to it, just hysterical claims of space lasers.

Can you show documentation these 'space lasers' exist, with specs showing their capability?

[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 3 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 19:15:28 ago (+4/-1)*

NDA's that prevent discussion of specific details of THAT particular relevant program included a tentative declas date of November, 2045.

And that is ALL I am going to say about THAT. Period. I stopped once at Ft. Leavenworth (on my way elsewhere) to fill my gas tank and get something to eat, and that is as close as I have any desire to get.

(And in response to anyone who feels an overwhelming need to call bullshit, I would first ask: Do you have access to a Titan 80-300 Cubed transmission electron microscope (TEM)? Because the level of my concern about what you may, or may not believe can only be detected on a quantum level, and I would want to to be absolutely certain that you can fully grasp it first.)

[ - ] McNasty 1 point 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:12:26 ago (+1/-0)

Can you show documentation these 'space lasers

Who the fuck said anything about space lasers? A DEW isn't in outer space you dumb fuck.

https://everydayconcerned.net/directed-energy-weapon-dew-documents/

And if you're going to pretend like the government doesn't openly brag about their DEW technology then you're obviously a faggot kike shill. It also explains why you have to attach Q to a basic observation. I have to disbelieve my own eyes because Q said it was true. Fuckin kikes.

[ - ] BulletStopper [op] 4 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 18:23:29 ago (+4/-0)*

Go look at the satellite tracks. The ones that just happened to be passing over Maui and Texas during the exact same time frames that the fires began.

Funny how after all this time, they STILL don't seem to have ANY arson suspects yet?

Let this be a lesson to the "new guys". If you're going to do something so massive that everybody is going to demand answers, like, say, oh, I don't know, assasinate JFK? Have your fucking "Oswald" lined up FIRST.

This kind of silly half-assed shit would have gotten you put on the Tristan da Cunha desk back in the old days.

[ - ] McNasty 3 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 18:32:53 ago (+4/-1)

The person asking isn't genuine. He brought up Q as if it was relevant. That's clearly not a thing accepted here on voat. Why would he bring up Q as if a person that believes DEWs exists would also believe Q is legit. Dead giveaway for a kike shill.

[ - ] Sector2 0 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 19:07:48 ago (+1/-1)

There are 9,494 active satellites in various Earth orbits. Which ones are the DEW satellites?

We're nearing the end of the rainy season in California, but in the fall I could take matches out in the hills and start a fire with little chance of being identified. We have tons of fires once it starts getting hot and dry. Had them before satellites existed too.

The DEW meme appears to lack credibility and purpose, except as some sort of psyop to paint 'right wingers' as fruitcakes. If there's any actual evidence, I'd like to see it.

[ - ] McNasty -1 points 1.3 yearsMar 9, 2024 22:13:45 ago (+0/-1)

Space is fake and gay. If there were so many satellites, we wouldn't need cell phone towers.