Sign into an existing account

Fun fact: stars have parallax. Kill yourself.

Watched again. This top comment is so true.

You don't believe that if each star existed at its own depth that it would have its own personal parallax. What good is a challenge if you don't accept the objective results?

Pretty easy to overcome his 'challenges' then.

Dunno. How often do you post lies?


Translation: “OH FUCK HE ACCURATELY REPEATED EXACTLY WHAT I SAID UH…. IT’S A LIE I SAY SO! PHEW NOW I WIN”


Translation: “I don’t know what gravity is.”


Proven falsehood.


Translation: “I know neither what the heliocentric model is nor what gravity is.”


Don’t care. You’re incapable of defending anything you say.


Cool. So… Earth isn’t flat, then. Got it.


And you’d be objectively wrong. Superinsulators have gravity. You have no argument whatsoever. You’re clinically insane and paid to post lies on this website.

That's a little bit different than spinning a thousand mph, revolving around the sun at 67,000 mph, The sun revolving around the Milky Way at 483,000 mph, and the Milky Way galaxy itself moving at 1.3 billion mph and not a single shred of parallax.

So let's break it down, from the diagram that I drew, a person would be traveling a thousand miles per hour for 12 hours straight and would have covered 12,450,000 miles. A little bit different from a head turn. And don't forget about all the other things that we are moving with, all in different directions.

That's just a whole nother issue for the globe because we would expect the speed of stars to vary depending where you are then. That's not a thing in heliocentrism. If I was to apply that logic to the stars it would be like a motorcycle you see in the distance coming towards you. Doesn't look that fast. It gets closer, it zooms by. It was an intense second but as you watch it go, it doesn't seem that fast anymore. If you're at the 12:00am position of my diagram, by the time you hit 6:00am position, the stars should be moving faster. It will be slowing down towards the final 12:00pm position.

That heads up on the links you give me, if you were arguing with somebody that said, the Holocaust happened and they can prove it, would you read the jews history book and admit you were wrong?

You got gifted. That's all there is to it. I'd be more understanding of your situation if you didn't simultaneously believe outer space is a thing and also believe that the heliocentric model regardless of it's dependency on a pressurized atmosphere. What the fuck do you think is up there?

That thinks it's retarded that you can ignore the second law of thermodynamics and claim a miracle as the reason heliocentrism is a thing. A. Pressurized atmosphere cannot exist next to a vacuum without some kind of physical barrier in between. End of story.

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."

~ Albert Einstein

A good example of one of those " persistent illusions." Micholson and Morley did an experiment to detect the Earth's revolution around the sun. The result was null. Einstein comes along and says that they actually did get the result that they predicted, but you can only observe those results from a perspective outside of our reality. He bases this retarded claim on his THEORETICAL SCIENCE THEORY of special relativity and insist that two separate objective realities can simultaneously occur. So the results exists outside of our reality. How do you test a result that exists outside of reality? Lol.


Maybe that's your problem. You're using kid toys to do science.


Because I understand what the vestibular system is? Lol. Are you 12 or something? Playing with toys, dreaming about high school? Lol.


For stacking stones. You sound like you're too retarded to be argued with.


There's a reason you have to sit down and buckle up when you're taking off in an airplane. You don't have to sit down and buckle up once you're in the air going a steady speed. You're probably too poor to fly. You only had 50 bucks to shell out for a telescope, am I right? Lol.


Give me one example that isn't begging the question by using the very thing I claim is wrong as the example. It doesn't exist. If you can find it, I will post a video of myself doing whatever you request. I'll even neck myself on camera and post it here just for you. All you have to do is give me that one example.


Are you one of those faggots that believed Men can have babies? You're kind typically believe those kind of things. It would explain why you can't accept basic observation for what it is.


I told you I would off myself if you just give me that one example I asked for. Something tells me you don't have the balls to give it to me because you're all tuck. You actually don't want me to kill myself. That'd be the only reason I can think of that you couldn't come up with one example.

No problem professor.