×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
25
16 comments block


[ - ] VitaminSieg 5 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 19:07:24 ago (+5/-0)

"Removed by (baby eating) moderators"

[ - ] Not_C 5 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 18:17:25 ago (+6/-1)

In the olden days "usury" which is basically just charging interest on loans, was explicitly forbidden by Christians and Muslims. Atheists didn't really exist, and pagans stayed out of cities.

So basically, every banker was Jewish. Now, as a thought experiment, how do you feel about the people running Goldman Sachs, the federal reserve, bank of America, the international monetary fund, the world economic forum and so on. Does it feel if they are part of a club designed to fuck you over?

Now imagine how you'd feel if your tribe/team/club/ religion explicitly forbid you from banking and only one group could.

Ok.... So Jews seized control of the banking industry because it was illegal and forbidden for everyone else.
What about every other industry that was illegal, sinful, and forbidden?
Explaining that this is the reason why the Jews control the banking industry, is also the explanation as to why the Jews control every other illegal and sinful industry.
And why they continually get thrown out of countries.

[ - ] Razzoriel 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 19:47:29 ago (+1/-0)

This is bullshit. Banking was allowed by the Catholic Church and the Knights Templar for instance did it. What they forbade was interest. You needed a collateral in case you did not pay though. Rules were different and sometimes bankers exchanged currency at a rate, which technically was not usury; you are paying a fee for a service.

After freemasonry took France and England the jews increasingly gained more rights, which allowed the nobility to use their banks. They didnt ask for collaterals but did ask for fees and bigger penalties if it was not paid, and this is how they bought the increasingly corrupted aristocracy.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 21:57:28 ago (+0/-0)

it's not bullshit. jews were exclusively used as bankers until the 1100s and the church enforced that. power dynamics started to shift from thereon. the bible started to be less and less enforced by the church, what you know from protestant propaganda as the period of growing immorality of the church. by 1500 german bankers like the fuggers had taken the monopoly from the jews. jews then funded the protestant reformation which changed all that and protestants went back to completely relying on the word of the bible and enforcing a banking monopoly for the jews. 'court jews' then dominated protestant monarchies, eventaully culminating in the rothschilds etc. and warring against the catholic church constantly until finally defeating it and its allied monarchies in ww1.

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 11 monthsMay 30, 2024 11:14:26 ago (+0/-0)

Jews were never the exclusive bankers. Banking existed forever. The issue is that it was much more different that time as it is today, and only jews had it in a format closer to modern times.

But you are correct in everything past that, yes.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 11 monthsMay 30, 2024 21:15:18 ago (+0/-0)

yes they 100% were the exclusive bankers of post rome christendom. don't try and fucking correct me when you don't have a clue. astounding people like you try and act like an authority on this issue when you don't even know basic facts. EXCLUSIVE MONOPOLY of moneylending are the two words you'll come across time and again when reading about the jews in the dark ages.

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 11 monthsMay 31, 2024 17:19:03 ago (+0/-0)

Moneylending was permitted with a collateral amongst Christians. Everyone lent money to everyone, and when they were suspicious, they asked collaterals. Knights Templar did it before jews, as well. Currency exchange in Genova was allowed by Christians too.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 11 monthsMay 31, 2024 22:23:27 ago (+0/-0)

no, that's how nobles lent to each other, and it was never enough so they had to resort to jews. no one else was lending money to everyone, there were no establishments to do so. i already fucking addressed the beginnings of changes from around 1100 on, and the knights templar relied on huge donations anyways, it wasn't a natural financial scheme. oh and fucking hilarious you keep bringing up the templars when a huge motivation behind their rise was that all the crusaders were going in deep debt to jews to get to the holy land.

[ - ] Peleg 4 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 16:28:07 ago (+4/-0)

The dumb ass needs to listen to his grandma. She was trying to Help him! Maybe even save his life.

[ - ] GreenSaint 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 17:37:23 ago (+2/-1)

One thing we lack in the west is respect of our elders. They come with all this knowledge and they’ll just give it to you. All you gotta do is ask. I bet his grandma also said cats should be shot on sight. This will be the number one message I pass down to future generations that’s for sure

[ - ] v0atmage 2 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 18:58:01 ago (+2/-0)

LOL OP on reddit is looking for voat : "a dark web forum with 15 active users"

https://files.catbox.moe/6i9b0s.jpg

[ - ] Kung_Flu 0 points 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 20:01:04 ago (+0/-0)

This place is very much open web. Dark web would be an onion site.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 1 point 11 monthsMay 28, 2024 21:52:45 ago (+1/-0)

He knows. He was just making a point

[ - ] v0atmage 0 points 11 monthsMay 30, 2024 21:43:00 ago (+0/-0)

yes, thank you.

[ - ] boekanier 1 point 11 monthsMay 29, 2024 08:04:49 ago (+1/-0)

"Why are there so many conspiracy theories about Jews?"
TOS Violation Bait
Sorry, this post has been removed by the moderators of r/conspiracy.