As much as you are obsessed with this dude, I guaran-fuxkin-tee you've been banned for life from his chatroom. Come clean and tell us why you got banned.
I've never been in his chatroom, a member of the cult or banned. Ever. But I hear that fat kike likes to ban everybody just like a little jew boy who can't handle others opinions. kek I would never allow a jew in my circle or allow a jew to front anything white, which homesteading is. Why the fuck would anyone listen to a born rich jew and not a redneck who lives it? jew boy has hired help. Its all on his hate sub at reddit. I merely warn people about this pos loser and his ugly he/she wife.
The earth is actually flat in some places, and they also make farming machines that flatten it to within an 1/8th inch over huge fields. But what flat actually means is "equidistant from the center of the ball".
Flat is interpreted as a "hydrualic equivalent" in both the "flat" and "spherical" worlds. Our future understanding will be further confounded in our originating questions (and therefore, assumptions). Too few look to unprogram, it's unfortunate. There is a way of calculating and validating the computation (or it's tendency) without confounding a system with too many "models". It's the interpretation (i.e. curve fitting) that programs us to see patterns where others don't ... and vice versa.
[ - ] Love240 1 point 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 15:16:06 ago (+1/-0)
The hydraulic equivalent is a concept used to relate the size of a mineral grain to the size of a quartz grain with the same settling velocity. This concept is used to compare the settling rates of grains of different densities through a fluid.
The "hydraulic equivilent" is taking a manometer and with water of the same density the surface will be assumed as "level". The definition you provided is nigger-level bullshit. Note the words "concept used to relate" the size of a mineral grain ... this is a "relation" not an exact fact. Also, you have just shown again the point I was making which is that the interpretation (overly literal in your case) is what hampers us to see a simpler reality.
You can see how science (the real science) is conflated with literal definitions to hide true usage and meaning. Is "density" correlative with "boyancy"? Would that have anything to do with the level of fluid in a manometer? Is the "equivalent" the "height" or a "density comparision"?
Either way, I'm glad in this instance you asked the question for calibration.
The "hydraulic equivilent" is taking a manometer and with water of the same density the surface will be assumed as "level". The definition you provided is nigger-level bullshit. Note the words "concept used to relate" the size of a mineral grain ... this is a "relation" not an exact fact. Also, you have just shown again the point I was making which is that the interpretation (overly literal in your case) is what hampers us to see a simpler reality.
You can see how science (the real science) is conflated with literal definitions to hide true usage and meaning. Is "density" correlative with "boyancy"? Would that have anything to do with the level of fluid in a manometer? Is the "equivalent" the "height" or a "density comparision"?
Either way, I'm glad in this instance you asked the question for calibration.
and you still haven't really said much. What are you trying to say, man?!
The message is that often the "obvious" conclusions we reach based on honest data is still biased with what we have already seen and more importantly what we already believe (or have concluded).
In the "flat" vs "globe" context, consider that both "assumptions" will yield confirmations of their models. But, both require different assumptions and interpretations. Most are not able to see this.
[ + ] CasualObserver
[ - ] CasualObserver 1 point 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 18:00:29 ago (+2/-1)
Come clean and tell us why you got banned.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic [op] 1 point 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 21:54:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 4 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 12:14:14 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 11:49:55 ago (+2/-3)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 12:58:14 ago (+3/-3)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 2 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 14:28:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 15:16:06 ago (+1/-0)
WTF are you talking about?
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 16:08:27 ago (+0/-0)
The "hydraulic equivilent" is taking a manometer and with water of the same density the surface will be assumed as "level". The definition you provided is nigger-level bullshit. Note the words "concept used to relate" the size of a mineral grain ... this is a "relation" not an exact fact. Also, you have just shown again the point I was making which is that the interpretation (overly literal in your case) is what hampers us to see a simpler reality.
You can see how science (the real science) is conflated with literal definitions to hide true usage and meaning. Is "density" correlative with "boyancy"? Would that have anything to do with the level of fluid in a manometer? Is the "equivalent" the "height" or a "density comparision"?
Either way, I'm glad in this instance you asked the question for calibration.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo -1 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 16:00:26 ago (+0/-1)
The "hydraulic equivilent" is taking a manometer and with water of the same density the surface will be assumed as "level". The definition you provided is nigger-level bullshit. Note the words "concept used to relate" the size of a mineral grain ... this is a "relation" not an exact fact. Also, you have just shown again the point I was making which is that the interpretation (overly literal in your case) is what hampers us to see a simpler reality.
You can see how science (the real science) is conflated with literal definitions to hide true usage and meaning. Is "density" correlative with "boyancy"? Would that have anything to do with the level of fluid in a manometer? Is the "equivalent" the "height" or a "density comparision"?
Either way, I'm glad in this instance you asked the question for calibration.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 16:18:49 ago (+1/-1)
What are you trying to say, man!?
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 3 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 16:25:29 ago (+3/-0)
The message is that often the "obvious" conclusions we reach based on honest data is still biased with what we have already seen and more importantly what we already believe (or have concluded).
In the "flat" vs "globe" context, consider that both "assumptions" will yield confirmations of their models. But, both require different assumptions and interpretations. Most are not able to see this.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 2 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 16:48:25 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 1 point 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 16:49:46 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic [op] 0 points 10 monthsJun 25, 2024 15:26:47 ago (+1/-1)