"But the situation has changed. With great discomfort, I find myself open to arguments for rearmament. I now believe we need to enhance our conventional capabilities, both to support other European nations against Russia and – something that seemed unimaginable a few years ago – perhaps to defend ourselves.".
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:36:16 ago (+1/-0)
Pretty sure that at the very beginning of this bullshit in Ukraine Putin said that he was not going to continue into Europe further once he achieves his goals in Ukraine
[ - ] clymer 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 12:19:10 ago (+1/-0)
Hey Neri- look up, they have been blanketing your skies with pulverized aluminum for 3 days straight. Breathe deep. You have been attacked with poison medicine, food, water, fucking AIR. You are locked deep in a 5th gen war, with no way out and yet you remain sitting there like a complete, oblivious utter brain dead moron, regurgitating main stream media talking points while the treasury of your nation is looted, your countrymen killed, your future stolen. And you are worried about Ukraine? WHat, are you concerned Zelenskyy's wife isn't getting two bugati's? fucking stupid tool
yeah because they succeeded in the jewish operation. Then we will watch all the planes fly in loaded with jews and they will return. Its why ukraine has been known for years to be the worst child sex slave trafficking hub among many other things like corruption at all levels. trumpberg will play his part while he and putin lol about wiping out all those white christians so they could clear the way for the jews to make israel 2.0.
Our [US + UK] joint enterprise has often been devastating to other people. Take, to give just a few examples, the US-UK coup that overthrew Mohammad Mosaddegh in Iran in 1953, the 20-year war in Afghanistan, the 2003 Iraq war, or the staunch support offered by Joe Biden and Rishi Sunak for the unfolding genocide in Gaza.
Then he 'weirdly' fails to mention the US/UK 'color revolutions' in Ukraine that culminated in the overthrow of the legitimate elected government in 2014. New leaders picked by US/UK jews (Victoria 'cookies' Nuland) then beginning oppression and genocide against the eastern 1/3 of the country composed heavily of ethnic Russians.
Russia helped rescue Crimea, but only gave indirect support to the Donbas people who the Ukrainian military was attacking with artillery, aerial bombing, and ground troops. Ukraine had amassed a force in early 2022 that was about to storm the Donbas and complete their slaughter, but Putin pre-empted their genocidal plans with official Russian troops.
NATO, the US, and the UK have supported and financed the genocide from the beginning, out of hatred for ethnic Russians, and because of the usefulness of the corrupt Ukrainian regime.
"I told them to fire the prosecutor [who was investigating his son hunter, among others] or they wouldn't get the billion dollars we promised them. Son of a bitch, they fired the prosecutor!" - Biden
The territories Russia has rescued so far voted overwhelmingly to join Russia, after at first simply wanting autonomy within Ukraine. Some speculate it was the bombing of their school children, markets, and civilian centers killing thousands that resulted in preferring the protection of mother Russia.
After Russia evicts the Ukrainian invaders from Western Russia and takes a buffer zone free of artillery and missiles, one would hope they bitch slap tf out of their NATO attackers.
The idea of Russia actually trying to capture the baltics and the rest of the NATO aggressors is silly beyond all rationality, but all of them deserve a heavy punishment. We're going to be disappointed on that score, because Putin is more of a strategist than a fighter. All of us in NATO countries operated by our Zionist Occupied Governments will have to save ourselves, because Russia is only defending itself. They're not coming to save us from our own hateful governments.
Hope you enjoyed my early morning book just skimming the highlights of the recent activities in Ukraine that resulted in the Special Military Operation by mother Russia.
Imagine believing a word of this. Trump won’t end anything and Putin isn’t going anywhere. People tell you to kill yourself because you spam literal jewish propaganda.
The French military is currently thought to retain a weapons stockpile of around 300 operational (deployed) nuclear warheads, making it the fourth-largest in the world, speaking in terms of warheads, not megatons.
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:45:03 ago (+1/-0)
Now hang on. Here is the concern:
Six U.S. nuclear weapon facilities in five NATO countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Turkey.
The US, under Trump, could close its NATO Nuclear Weapons facilities which just leaves France; as according to the writer of the Article on which this sub is based:
"Conversely, this is also a good moment for the UK government to rethink its position on nuclear weapons. It’s time to recognise that our “independent nuclear deterrent” has never been independent. Because key components are supplied and controlled by the US, we cannot operate it without US consent. So, if Trump regains the White House, it would not be a deterrent, either: Putin knows we cannot use it. The UK’s nuclear programme is a £172bn heap of bricks. Why waste more money on it?".
Summary
Once the US closes its NATO nuclear facilities, all that is left to deter Russia, with its 4,380 nuclear warheads if France with its 300 operational (deployed) nuclear warheads! C’est une situation terriblement disproportionnée !
Nigger, Putin, the day before the Russian military went into Ukraine, said that Russia was recognizing the Donbass as no longer a part of Ukraine and moving to secure the region. After the fighting stops, those people in the Donbass will vote to either join Russia or stay independent. Within 30 days of going in, Russia had drawn a line in Ukraine that was 90% of the stated goal, which was authorizedby the Russian Parlement with the approvalof well over 80% of the Russian people. Years later, Russia is now at 95% of the stated goal, with more than a million White people killed, going no further than their stated goal. Arming Ukraine is getting people killed for no reason while rich people get more rich.
Russia never said it was going to "take kiev". Russia has never tried to "take kiev". And, Russia has shown zero intention of "taking kiev". As much as the US government and the EU government want you to believe, occupations of countries that do not want you there is stupid and pointless. There is no reason to believe Russia is ever going to try to "take kiev", let alone invade Europe.
Quit being a ninny for the military industrial complex.
Russia is stronger today then before they went in.
BTW, if nukes are real. 300 nuclear warheads will destroy any country on the planet. You don't need to have more nukes than the other guy. Only enough to cripple their country. 300 is more than enough. Russia can destroy the world 10 times over and has more nukes than NATO and the US combined. And, China is supporting them, not us.
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:39:07 ago (+1/-0)*
"There is no reason to believe Russia is ever going to try to "take kiev", let alone invade Europe.".
Well...depends who you believe:
"Russian President Vladimir Putin said in an interview aired on Thursday that Moscow had no interest in invading "Poland, Latvia or anywhere else"
"Polish President Andrzej Duda said Russian President Vladimir Putin will attack other states if the Kremlin wins its war in Ukraine"
Edit: Agree that only a few nukes are needed to destroy a country but I guess that with a swarm of [Russian] nukes there's more chance of a few hitting France than a few of France's 300 hitting Russian cities?
Edit: Once a nuclear missile has been launched, there is very limited capabilities of stopping that missile. No nation has a credible system in place to combat launched nuclear weapons.
Edit: Maybe Putin is gambling that a first strike on France with the RS-28 Sarmat missile that:
"could destroy an area the size of Texas or France." (no offense) would nullify France's nuclear threat?
Polician says shit with nothing to support his assertion.
Trust me bro. That's the one you DON'T believe.
Putin is executing EXACTLY what he was authorized by the Russian Parlement and the Russian people to do, nothing more.
The use of nuclear weapons means the entire annihilation of the planet's population. 1 nuke hitting a major Russian city would cripple Russia for the next hundred years. Just one! Same with any city in Europe or any city in the US. Nuclear war is not winnable. Ain't you seen "Wargames"? The only winning move is not to play.
Agreed on everything but your beliefs about nukes. A global nuclear war would not annihilate earths human population. That's propaganda. What it would do eliminate most of modern jewish society, and most of the excess population in the global north, plus Australia. Probably not a lot of nukes aimed at Uruguay.
Ones degree of enthusiasm for jewish supremacy would determine whether that could be considered a win or not.
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 10 monthsJul 6, 2024 08:29:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:36:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 19:43:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 23:55:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] clymer
[ - ] clymer 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 12:19:10 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 15:37:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 19:44:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 19:44:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 10:38:37 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 10:24:54 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 10:21:23 ago (+2/-0)
Then he 'weirdly' fails to mention the US/UK 'color revolutions' in Ukraine that culminated in the overthrow of the legitimate elected government in 2014. New leaders picked by US/UK jews (Victoria 'cookies' Nuland) then beginning oppression and genocide against the eastern 1/3 of the country composed heavily of ethnic Russians.
Russia helped rescue Crimea, but only gave indirect support to the Donbas people who the Ukrainian military was attacking with artillery, aerial bombing, and ground troops. Ukraine had amassed a force in early 2022 that was about to storm the Donbas and complete their slaughter, but Putin pre-empted their genocidal plans with official Russian troops.
NATO, the US, and the UK have supported and financed the genocide from the beginning, out of hatred for ethnic Russians, and because of the usefulness of the corrupt Ukrainian regime.
"I told them to fire the prosecutor [who was investigating his son hunter, among others] or they wouldn't get the billion dollars we promised them. Son of a bitch, they fired the prosecutor!" - Biden
The territories Russia has rescued so far voted overwhelmingly to join Russia, after at first simply wanting autonomy within Ukraine. Some speculate it was the bombing of their school children, markets, and civilian centers killing thousands that resulted in preferring the protection of mother Russia.
After Russia evicts the Ukrainian invaders from Western Russia and takes a buffer zone free of artillery and missiles, one would hope they bitch slap tf out of their NATO attackers.
The idea of Russia actually trying to capture the baltics and the rest of the NATO aggressors is silly beyond all rationality, but all of them deserve a heavy punishment. We're going to be disappointed on that score, because Putin is more of a strategist than a fighter. All of us in NATO countries operated by our Zionist Occupied Governments will have to save ourselves, because Russia is only defending itself. They're not coming to save us from our own hateful governments.
Hope you enjoyed my early morning book just skimming the highlights of the recent activities in Ukraine that resulted in the Special Military Operation by mother Russia.
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:54:00 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:56:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 08:01:50 ago (+1/-0)
All historical information on all subjects says otherwise.
2 + 2 ≡ 4. Always.
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:40:30 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:18:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:16:30 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:23:43 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:27:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:29:50 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:45:03 ago (+1/-0)
Six U.S. nuclear weapon facilities in five NATO countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and Turkey.
The US, under Trump, could close its NATO Nuclear Weapons facilities which just leaves France; as according to the writer of the Article on which this sub is based:
"Conversely, this is also a good moment for the UK government to rethink its position on nuclear weapons. It’s time to recognise that our “independent nuclear deterrent” has never been independent. Because key components are supplied and controlled by the US, we cannot operate it without US consent. So, if Trump regains the White House, it would not be a deterrent, either: Putin knows we cannot use it. The UK’s nuclear programme is a £172bn heap of bricks. Why waste more money on it?".
Summary
Once the US closes its NATO nuclear facilities, all that is left to deter Russia, with its 4,380 nuclear warheads if France with its 300 operational (deployed) nuclear warheads! C’est une situation terriblement disproportionnée !
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:27:12 ago (+3/-0)*
Nigger, Putin, the day before the Russian military went into Ukraine, said that Russia was recognizing the Donbass as no longer a part of Ukraine and moving to secure the region. After the fighting stops, those people in the Donbass will vote to either join Russia or stay independent. Within 30 days of going in, Russia had drawn a line in Ukraine that was 90% of the stated goal, which was authorizedby the Russian Parlement with the approvalof well over 80% of the Russian people. Years later, Russia is now at 95% of the stated goal, with more than a million White people killed, going no further than their stated goal. Arming Ukraine is getting people killed for no reason while rich people get more rich.
Russia never said it was going to "take kiev". Russia has never tried to "take kiev". And, Russia has shown zero intention of "taking kiev". As much as the US government and the EU government want you to believe, occupations of countries that do not want you there is stupid and pointless. There is no reason to believe Russia is ever going to try to "take kiev", let alone invade Europe.
Quit being a ninny for the military industrial complex.
Russia is stronger today then before they went in.
BTW, if nukes are real. 300 nuclear warheads will destroy any country on the planet. You don't need to have more nukes than the other guy. Only enough to cripple their country. 300 is more than enough. Russia can destroy the world 10 times over and has more nukes than NATO and the US combined. And, China is supporting them, not us.
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri [op] 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:39:07 ago (+1/-0)*
Well...depends who you believe:
"Russian President Vladimir Putin said in an interview aired on Thursday that Moscow had no interest in invading "Poland, Latvia or anywhere else"
"Polish President Andrzej Duda said Russian President Vladimir Putin will attack other states if the Kremlin wins its war in Ukraine"
Edit: Agree that only a few nukes are needed to destroy a country but I guess that with a swarm of [Russian] nukes there's more chance of a few hitting France than a few of France's 300 hitting Russian cities?
Edit: Once a nuclear missile has been launched, there is very limited capabilities of stopping that missile. No nation has a credible system in place to combat launched nuclear weapons.
Edit: Maybe Putin is gambling that a first strike on France with the RS-28 Sarmat missile that:
"could destroy an area the size of Texas or France." (no offense) would nullify France's nuclear threat?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 07:45:33 ago (+2/-0)*
Trust me bro. That's the one you DON'T believe.
Putin is executing EXACTLY what he was authorized by the Russian Parlement and the Russian people to do, nothing more.
The use of nuclear weapons means the entire annihilation of the planet's population. 1 nuke hitting a major Russian city would cripple Russia for the next hundred years. Just one! Same with any city in Europe or any city in the US. Nuclear war is not winnable. Ain't you seen "Wargames"? The only winning move is not to play.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 2 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 10:37:34 ago (+2/-0)
Ones degree of enthusiasm for jewish supremacy would determine whether that could be considered a win or not.
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:20:01 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 10 monthsJul 4, 2024 06:30:31 ago (+1/-0)