Sign into an existing account

Lets have a thought experiment. Consider the pros and cons for each theory.

Flat Earth:
+ Spherical Earth theory, its counterpart, is pushed by all mainstream
+ Considers all boundaries "ice"
+ Coincides with other theories such as "men never stepped on the Moon"
+ There is no financial estabilishment behind it

- There is no jewdicial backlash from doubting the Earth is round (AKA the status quo does not feel threatened by it)
- Disproved by the horizon line
- Cannot properly counterargument
- Discredits that the world as a sphere concept is more than a thousand-and-half years old, confirmed by Catholic Church in drawings and paintings (monarchs holding a globe with a cross represent a world with Christ above it)

Germ theory

+ Uses as basis that immunity can be used somehow to fight it
+ Promotes hygiene as a good way to reduce disease
+ Has the entire medical estabilishment behind it

- Has the entire medical estabilishment behind it ("trust the science")
- No virus has ever been isolated, but atoms, which are much smaller, had and been manipulated with ease
- All current images of viruses are computer-generated from what some faggot with a labcoat thinks it looks like
- A multi trillion dollar industry is surrounded by it to the extent it controls governments and agencies around the globe to push its agenda
- Doctors are suppressed, muted or even killed if they posit counterarguments
- You can be prosecuted and potentially lose your life by denying it in a way
- Created by jews

Which theory you think is more far-fetched?