[ - ] Dingo 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 11:55:58 ago (+1/-0)
Autist ... Often makes common fallacy of accepting things
This is when I stopped listening. Best case, he has "Gell-Man" amnesia, worst case a grifter/agent.
Means well
He presents himself as someone who means well. This, however is meaningless in any real evauation of the correctness (or "truthness") of his information or assertions.
Ivermectin does almost zero out your viable sperm for at least 3-4 weeks. He cites sources.
That aught to be alarming to any couples trying to have a baby.
Whether or not his hypothesis of it causing longer term damage is up in the air/not concluded.
I, personally, doubt there is anything after 6 weeks.
My first kid was born years after I took mighty doses of the stuff.
The Twitter link from the doctor showing size of tumor shrinking after ivermectin looks legit.
I think you equating the 2 issues as malice is a larger leap than Tim Truths suspicion of ivermectin. He basically wonders out loud if ivermectin could have been the scandemic trojan horse the whole time.
Not a bad hypothesis. Just one I don't really believe. And I don't knock him for it. Again, he has the studies to show it does do damage.
[ - ] localsal 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 20:16:52 ago (+1/-0)
The fact that ivermectin is over the counter in a lot of countries - many with booming populations - seems to discount his whole thesis.
There may be a period where fertility is affected after the initial use, but it sure does look like fertility rebounds after a while.
During convid, weren't African countries the ones with the lowest rates of infection? Because ivermectin is so available there? And Africa has never had a fertility problem since the West listened the filthy kikes and flooded the continent with food and other aid.
He was a blogger calling out the covid nonesense but I stopped listening when he ranted on about "nazis". It's possible he just has a blindness but I highly suspect him as some kind of schill or presentation agent (like many grifter/bloggers).
I was unable to find his real name. Help?
I'm not so interested in getting that info per se, but curious of the validity of his information. I will say that if I take him completely out, I reach more accurate conclusions. So, I have him filed under "Podcast Bullshitters".
That said, it seems the info he presenting on ivermectin (at least lately) is quite accurate. The shit is toxic as fuck.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 -1 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 11:26:04 ago (+0/-1)
Means well
Often makes common fallacy of accepting things that fits into his paradigm while rejecting things that doesn't.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 11:55:58 ago (+1/-0)
This is when I stopped listening. Best case, he has "Gell-Man" amnesia, worst case a grifter/agent.
He presents himself as someone who means well. This, however is meaningless in any real evauation of the correctness (or "truthness") of his information or assertions.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 12:31:32 ago (+1/-1)*
Ivermectin does almost zero out your viable sperm for at least 3-4 weeks. He cites sources.
That aught to be alarming to any couples trying to have a baby.
Whether or not his hypothesis of it causing longer term damage is up in the air/not concluded.
I, personally, doubt there is anything after 6 weeks.
My first kid was born years after I took mighty doses of the stuff.
The Twitter link from the doctor showing size of tumor shrinking after ivermectin looks legit.
I think you equating the 2 issues as malice is a larger leap than Tim Truths suspicion of ivermectin. He basically wonders out loud if ivermectin could have been the scandemic trojan horse the whole time.
Not a bad hypothesis. Just one I don't really believe. And I don't knock him for it. Again, he has the studies to show it does do damage.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 20:16:52 ago (+1/-0)
There may be a period where fertility is affected after the initial use, but it sure does look like fertility rebounds after a while.
During convid, weren't African countries the ones with the lowest rates of infection? Because ivermectin is so available there? And Africa has never had a fertility problem since the West listened the filthy kikes and flooded the continent with food and other aid.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 0 points 8 monthsAug 31, 2024 23:02:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo -2 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 11:52:00 ago (+0/-2)*
He was a blogger calling out the covid nonesense but I stopped listening when he ranted on about "nazis". It's possible he just has a blindness but I highly suspect him as some kind of schill or presentation agent (like many grifter/bloggers).
I'm not so interested in getting that info per se, but curious of the validity of his information. I will say that if I take him completely out, I reach more accurate conclusions. So, I have him filed under "Podcast Bullshitters".
That said, it seems the info he presenting on ivermectin (at least lately) is quite accurate. The shit is toxic as fuck.
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel 2 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 13:40:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 8 monthsAug 29, 2024 16:00:29 ago (+0/-0)