Jewish monopoly on sugar and cotton - Upgoat

No one will believe us or find us to be reliable sources of information if we just pull accusations out of our asses. If we are to make an airtight case against jews harming civilization we should be able to back up what we say with facts. A line in the jewclopedia which cites no data does not negate the broad perception that the majority of plantation owners were Whites Christians. Otherwise we’d have a lot of black people named goldberg or schwartz and not jackson or washington.

[ + ] Clubberlang

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 12:16:29 ago (+0/-0)

Oddly enough most of em have Irish last names.

Explain that one.

Don't worry I will.

The Irish were the 1st slaves in America. But didn't complain did their work and prospered.

The yid saw the opportunity to exploit the room temp IQ of the nogs on the plantation and taught them learned helplessness.

Which they practice to this day.

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 13:01:55 ago (+0/-0)

Irish

Eh, not so sure.

Johnson, Williams, Jackson, Brown, Jones, Smith, Davis, Thomas, Harris, Robbinson, Taylor,, Wilson, Moore , White, Lewis, Walker

Heres a list of the most common 15 or so AA names. They are all British as far as I can tell.

I think there were some enterprising Scotch Irish types that settled in the south in the 1700s and some became successful plantation owners. So you see some black O’Neill’s and so on.

I think that the indentured irish slaves, many of whom ended up mixing with niggies, especially in the carabbean, were Catholic, not Scotch Irish Proddies (a different group with significant english and scottish ancestry.) Related but not the same.

[ + ] Clubberlang

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 12:13:07 ago (+1/-0)

Oyyyyyy Veyyyy duhhhhh ADL will heeruhboudiss! Kvetch!

[ + ] canbot

[ - ] canbot 0 points 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 16:33:16 ago (+0/-0)

Do you have a source for that claim? Personally I believe that's true because jews are not known for farming. But because I don't have evidence for that I am open to the possibility that jews did in fact own a lot of cotton farms.

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 20:40:03 ago (+0/-0)

Whites settled the land, Jews bought the land. I daresay they formed a monopoly on anything that could be bought in the Americas, unlike Europe there was no landed nobility and thus they could obtain land in the Americas. Of course, they had to wait until someone else obtained that land and did something with it, and then were willing to sell it. The same process then repeated in Europe when through revolutions the landed nobility were removed so that the moneyed nobility could take over.

Christianity enabled Jews to gobble up most of the money through usury, they then simply had to wait until the chance arose to use that money to replace the landed nobility.

[ - ] Dingo 0 points 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 17:59:56 ago (+0/-0)

It's this way every single time. Look into literally anything.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 12:11:22 ago (+0/-0)

What's that you said rabbi?

The jews were benefitting from the slave trade?

Tell me my conditioning isn't wrong!

Sign into an existing account

Jewish monopoly on sugar and cotton submitted by Conspirologist to Screenshot 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 04:48:16 ago (+38/-1) (files.catbox.moe)https://files.catbox.moe/03g5rw.jpeg

Jewish monopoly on sugar and cotton
submitted by Conspirologist to Screenshot 8 monthsOct 18, 2024 04:48:16 ago (+38/-1) (files.catbox.moe)
https://files.catbox.moe/03g5rw.jpeg