The idea that someone who is irresponsible, morally corrupt, and / or is completely stupid can be voting in elections that affect other people is fundamentally wrong. “Democracy” without limitations on who can vote is a wrong system. - Upgoat

The idea that someone who is irresponsible, morally corrupt, and / or is completely stupid can be voting in elections that affect other people is fundamentally wrong. “Democracy” without limitations on who can vote is a wrong system.
submitted by CoronaHoax to politics 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 10:43:58 ago (+36/-1) (politics)

I am trying to figure out why libs vote Kamala. I really am. And the bottom line I keep seeing is “I know I’m wrong, I know everything I believe and say about Trump is a falsehood, but I have “my” vote and it’s all powerful and I’m just going to vote against you”

Folks this is a completely morally wrong system. People who can’t vote morally, responsibly, or aren’t smart enough to do the two prior should not be voting. If they are, this is a morally bankrupt system and also a reckless endangerment of a system.

33 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 13:26:40 ago (+4/-0)

If women vote at large in your society, you're on the decline. That's all there is to it. It's a tough pill to swallow especially for intelligent women who would be valuable contributors. The way that some people are hemmed up unfairly for the features of their identity as a whole is something we all have to find a better way to deal with. I'm sure there were plenty of men storming Normandy who didn't have that dog in them to fight like some other men do. They were there regardless.

[ - ] Clubberlang 4 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 11:19:52 ago (+4/-0)*

Having no choice for a candidate and having one appointed to you without a vote is treasonous.

I am trying to figure out why libs vote Kamala.

They never voted for her to become their candidate their own party anointed her the candidate without a vote. But their attention spans are that of a knit or they are just that stupid they don't understand how the selection process works.

I'll go with the later as the aforementioned would be catastrophic in terms of what America can look forward to if we make it to a 250 year old Constitutional Republic.

[ + ] CoronaHoax

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 12:03:01 ago (+1/-0)

Having no choice for a candidate and having one appointed to you without a vote is treasonous.

This exemplifies exactly why parties can not get preferential treatment on the ballots and also be in control of their primaries.

[ - ] Imsickofmakingusernames 1 point 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 08:14:27 ago (+1/-0)

Even if the information/truth embargo is rectified, we still have the problem of general incompetency. I think voting should be solely based on merit. There should be a voting class of people who have proven their worth through real intelligence not indoctrination that they should make the decisions for the whole. Of course the ‘adult children’ class have the ability to rise to the occasion but most likely… you can’t fix stupid. You have to take a competency test to drive…. This would pretty much remove a lot of the undesirables from the equation. We just need to focus on preventing the emotionally manipulative propaganda from taking hold of white women. I think making the course required heavy on this subject would weed out the dumb white bitches as well. lol

[ - ] GetFuckedCunt 2 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 17:32:23 ago (+2/-0)

The notion that voting or democracy has ever worked is retarded.

We were much better of under the rule of strong men. Alexander the great was conquering nations at sixteen while your all having a hissyfit over fake votes in a fake democracy.

Sixteen year olds shouldnt be voting, they should be leading men to battle against our enemies as our ancestors once did.

[ - ] carnold03 1 point 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 07:56:27 ago (+2/-1)

Democracy with limitations? Aren't those called republics?

[ + ] CoronaHoax

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 10:16:39 ago (+0/-0)

Exactly. I find it so annoying people keep saying we have a republic. So long as we let everyone including their children and people who never even set foot in the country to vote, we’re a defacto democracy.

[ - ] Imsickofmakingusernames 1 point 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 07:55:53 ago (+1/-0)

Democracy will never be functional when most people are completely fucking stupid. The fact that people aren’t even capable of acting in their own best interest means they are just ripe for manipulation.

[ - ] MaryXmas 2 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 17:15:02 ago (+2/-0)

They are doing it for what they believe is the moral good. They are obligated to do the moral thing, because they believe what they see on tv. Simple as. All of the facts of poor living conditions, crime, illegals, all of it can be explained away as inconvenient or look at the benefits. They are doing what they think is correct, based on their world view. I have a family member that said ,"well, I really think people are waking up and will do the right thing by voting for Kamala". Absolutely embarrassing.

[ + ] CoronaHoax

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 20:26:33 ago (+0/-0)

Yes but the thing is what happens after you set their facts straight. Then you get the response that I mentioned.

[ + ] jfroybees

[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 14:53:14 ago (+0/-0)

Did you help the family member clean up after you vomited on him/her?

[ + ] MaryXmas

[ - ] MaryXmas 1 point 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 17:33:17 ago (+1/-0)

They have to be very careful what they say around me, I may say something truthful.

[ + ] jfroybees

[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 23:01:57 ago (+0/-0)

I have a sister whom if i ever see I will have to adjust her. She's got a mouth and a sense of superiority. Lives in her gay bubble, her liberal bubble. She's all eat up with such progressive cankers. I stay indifferent to her existence, but if I ever saw her, there will be violence because of her mouth and her complexes. So, I give her nothing of me. She's been told to stay away from me and mine. The person who wrote to give them nothing was onto it. What resonated with me is to not even give them your time, which is your company. Life is too short to be in the company of all that is contrary to a clean, ordered, sensible life. She isn't careful about what she says.

[ - ] Theo 2 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 12:22:28 ago (+2/-0)

You're right, democracy is the embodiment of the ad populum fallacy.

One solution might be a free exchange of of ideas leading to a meritocracy.

[ - ] bohmoonx 1 point 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 00:42:48 ago (+1/-0)

That's a really great question and I'm glad you asked. Coming from a middle class...

Anyway, I think white women voting for Kamala so they have access to abortions and see him as a womanizer.

All the fucked up alphabet people vote Kamala.

I can't figure out why the jews are doing...Soros is funding all the niggers. Thinking some are thinking about running off the jew owned plantation.

[ - ] TheOriginal1Icemonkey 1 point 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 22:12:46 ago (+1/-0)

30, male, land owner.
Period.

[ - ] Puller_of_Noses 1 point 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 17:36:29 ago (+1/-0)

Millions of California voters voted for limited funding to feed/house illegal invaders in the 90s.
One female jew judge overruled millions of citizens and chamged the state (and the nation) forever.
Fuck voting.

[ + ] jfroybees

[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 6 monthsNov 1, 2024 15:16:05 ago (+0/-0)

That's called lawfare and it needs to end.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 14:19:50 ago (+1/-0)

Universal Suffrage.
(We all suffer.)

[ - ] Breeder 0 points 6 monthsOct 30, 2024 04:28:36 ago (+0/-0)

It's all so talmudic.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 22:12:06 ago (+0/-0)

The right to vote must be earned. There are certain jobs which need to be performed in this society. Many of these jobs we are currently outsourcing to other countries like china. We need to require that every citizen who wants to vote must perform one of these jobs for a significant time period. Productive work is part of morality. Additionally we can strike off voters for participation in drugs or usury or adultery.

I would like to see a society in which factory workers can vote but psychiatrists cannot.

[ - ] o0shad0o 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 20:38:23 ago (+0/-0)

If a majority of the population is reasonably smart and moral then democracy ought to work. Alternatively, if a majority of the population is stupid or immoral then the country is probably screwed no matter who's in charge.

The issue is that many people who are reasonably smart and moral are apparently also gullible.

[ - ] Sal_180 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 18:53:39 ago (+0/-0)

The idea that someone who is irresponsible, morally corrupt, and / or is completely stupid

You're literally describing Trump.

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 16:35:26 ago (+0/-0)

Democracy is just all of society committing violence against itself. And because of that single act of mutual violence we've licensed others to carry out the physical acts and it's somehow our fault. Meanwhile voting doesn't give us any meaningful control over how the system operates.

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 16:28:04 ago (+0/-0)

I mean how would the left ever make money. No stupid people means no one voting for 'progressives'

[ - ] xmasskull 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 16:23:46 ago (+0/-0)

Corruption started when women were granted the "Vote"!

Prove me fuking wrong.

[ - ] Prairie 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 16:16:58 ago (+0/-0)

OK, so the morally corrupt now decide who's morally corrupt and bar them from voting. Now only the morally corrupt vote. Better?

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 14:08:51 ago (+0/-0)

Gib recipients should not be allowed to vote. Any gibs. If you owe government money, no vote for you.

[ + ] CoronaHoax

[ - ] CoronaHoax [op] 1 point 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 21:30:24 ago (+1/-0)

Exactly conflict of interest voters are the first to go

[ - ] Dingo 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 13:44:00 ago (+0/-0)

The idea that someone who is irresponsible, morally corrupt, and / or is completely stupid can be voting in elections that affect other people is fundamentally wrong.

This should be the only text in any encyclopedia under the heading "Democracy".

[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 12:04:40 ago (+1/-1)

elections that affect other people is fundamentally wrong

Nature implies foundation...each ones free will of choice within nature implies a generated elect. It's selecting others as representatives for self which is the issue.

system

Each system is suggested by few to contain many, while distracting each from discerning for self to wield a FREE will of choice within nature.

System aka synistanai (standing together) contradicts nature setting each one within apart from one another. https://www.etymonline.com/word/system

Reality separates; fiction combines...one can only discern this for self; not by others.

[ - ] Looneyskiprooney -1 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 21:36:34 ago (+0/-1)

Since you think the US is a democracy, I cannot take you seriously. dumbocracy hugs my nuts!

[ - ] jfroybees -1 points 6 monthsOct 29, 2024 16:28:35 ago (+0/-1)

This is not a democracy. It's a Republic and has an electoral college.

Sign into an existing account