Sign into an existing account

He's wrong. Voting does not mean that you "ascent" (is that the word he used?) to the candidate's platform.

The winner of the election will insist that he has a mandate from the will of the people. That comes from winning the election, whether the candidate gets 80 million votes or just 80 votes. You not voting is simply your own person objection to the candidates.

And when a pundit comes in and says "don't vote" and openly says that he's talking about one side's constituency, then it looks like a concerted effort to help the other guy, which is faggotry.

I will not be voting for president because I can't support a war candidate, a bitch for Israel, or an endorsement of flooding our country with immigrants, legal or otherwise.

I'll be voting down ballot, but not for president. If Kamala wins, that's Trump's fault for getting on the Israel train and promising infinite chinks and street shitters. (My autocorrect corrects "chinks" to "Chinese".)

I'm hoping for the Raskin option.

This smells strongly of, "Dear fellow White People..."

I had been thinking about sitting this one out. But then the usual run of faggots had to unsnap the flaps on their collective cock-holsters and come out in support of the cacklin' pajeet and uncle fester.

If my voting for Trump can cause any one of those fucksticks to get a fucking hemorrhoid then it would be time well spent

That guy should extract his head from his asshole.

＞ instead of expending the least amount of effort possible just take yourself out of the equation completely by not voting

maybe someone should tell this cuckservative you don't get results by doing nothing, the world won't suddenly revolve around novoters

Don't vote goy, just read the fucking federalist papers. What a faggot.