Women MUST have children. The basic premise that women should have complete autonomy over their bodies and no responsibilities to society ignores the fact that men involuntarily must fight and die with a draft to preserve society.
Women must have children at least until artificial wombs are accepted. Then the need for women will be much lessened.
Let’s agree that women have an obligation to have and raise children in the way that men have an obligation to work productive jobs.
The basic premise that women should have complete autonomy over their bodies and no responsibilities to society ignores the fact that men involuntarily must fight and die with a draft to preserve society.
Women should have autonomy over their bodies in the same way that men should have autonomy over who they work for and what work they do. We should never force anyone into pregnancy (rape) or force one man to be enslaved to another. These are both forms of slavery.
Im not talking about abortion. People that get themselves pregnant by choosing to have sex should not get to kill their babies. Thats not autonomy, thats murder.
The draft is totally unnecessary. Stop blaming women for what wealthy men do to poor men. War is groups of men organized to steal shit from each other so they can have more wealth and better women. Its an overwhelmingly male phenomenon.
If you want to cast our struggle to rebuild society as some male vs female conflict then know this: war is caused by men. If you want to end it to improve the lot of men, it is on men to do so. It is preposterous to insist women as a species owe men for men warring with other men. Im not having it. Men need to stop fighting brother wars for other wealthy powerful men for shekels. You are causing your own problem there.
Women must have children at least until artificial wombs are accepted. Then the need for women will be much lessened.
What fresh jewish hell is this? Artificial wombs? Yeah. Thats just a great idea. Whats that going to do to the evolution of the human race? Who’s gonna raise these babies? Men? Bad idea.
[ - ] taoV 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 12:35:27 ago (+2/-1)
Artifical wombs are men doing what they've done for all of technology. Women don't want the job so we'll make something that will. You ladies didn't feel threatended by dishwashers or bread machines, why is this different?
[ - ] taoV 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:35:19 ago (+1/-0)
It has. The difference is that artifical wombs are the first thing to put the power to create children (non forcefully) in the hands of men. In particular, the hands of those men who can't have family in the current disaster. It's a complete inversion of what has happened before.
Because a woman's worth is in the children she provides and she knows it. These modern feminists cannot admit to it however, not even postwallhag here.
You ladies didn't feel threatended by dishwashers or bread machines, why is this different?
Stop. You are talking like a feminist. How would you feel if I said “you men sure enjoy rape!” Theres all kinds of women in the world, we’re all different. We’re like people that way.
Dishwashers and bread machines will not have a massive rapid impact on the evolution of humans biologically. Artificial wombs will. You will be obviating the need for women for gestation. So then men will in some cases be the sole parents to children. Men are not behaviorally predisposed to raise children. They don’t have the instincts. If they did they would act like women, who have been selected for child rearing traits. Not men. For a while you would have alot of dead or psychologically damaged children. But eventually males would begin to be selected for maternal traits. Think on that. You guys love to circle jerk about how rational and superior your male brain is. Its not good at what women do. You are selected for bring home the bacon traits. Kill or be killed traits. Not good for taking care of babies. Are you willing to steer the male species toward a less masculine future? That would happen after a few centuries as men became more like women. Evolving to be better moms will have cognitive tradeoffs for men.
A dishwasher doesn’t change the nature of women , any more than powertools change the nature of men. Artificial wombs are a whole other ballgame.
It is pretty well shown that outcomes for single fathers are many times better by all metrics than single mothers. The role of men is to create order. The role of women is to create life.
Women are predisposed to nurture and empathize, and for infants that is very necessary.
It is pretty well shown that outcomes for single fathers are many times better by all metrics than single mothers.
Most single fathers don't become single fathers until after their kids reach school age. Many single mothers are that way from the start. Plenty of men would have difficulty with the diaper changing phase of raising a baby, and postwallhag has a point there.
Also, most single fathers are white, while single mothers are more likely to either be another race or have mixed kids. Mixed and nonwhite kids have worse outcomes because they're niggers. I'm not aware of any study that adjusted for the race of the child and single parent. And while single fathers have kids with lower crime rates, better educational attainment, and higher average income, single mothers have kids with stronger interpersonal relationship skills. There are tradeoffs.
The real argument for there being bias is that single fathers don't get to take custody unless they are amazing and the mother is complete trash. But I do buy that single fathers are better than single mother. This is pretty sexist but women have a sort of insanity and if that's the only foundation of a child's life then that insanity is far to potent.
This is pretty sexist but women have a sort of insanity
Even though the majority of theives rapists and murders throughout history were men? Even though the majority of tyrants and enslavers down through the ages were men, and men are drawn to wars to murder their brothers like a moth to a flame? Is male evil really rational? What qualifies as crazy to you?
Males are as insane as women and more dangerous.
Do you believe in evolution? Why would evolution favor females to be “insane”? Is there a purpose to it? Males kill each other because it creates a reproductive advantage to eliminate their sexual competiton and steal each other’s resources. Not rational but purposeful even if you are unaware of why you do it. Its the insanity of testosterone.
Estrogen also provokes some insane behavior but it too has a purpose. Maleness and femaleness are far older than the human race. That is why male dogs and male horses have comparable behavioral traits to human males and the same with females. The horomones prime humans for reproductively useful behaviors. Males have never been the primary caretakers of children and are not selected to excel at it. Once again goats are heavy on opinion and light on logic in this thread. The psychological makeup of women is designed to make her a better parent then a male. Not every single one, but on average.
It is pretty well shown that outcomes for single fathers are many times better by all metrics than single mothers.
Oh? cite please.
The role of men is to create order.
You sound like a fortune cookie. Men are the biggest bringers of order and also of disorder. All war and most crime and violence is perpetrated by men. The drug trade is overwhelmingly created by men. Usury is overwhlemingly perpetrated by men. Shitty corporations are overwhelmingly run by men. If you want to give credit to men for all their great projects of order you are going to have to own all the chaos and destruction and disorder caused by men. You guys constantly cherry pick “female” sources of disorder as evidence that women are inherently irrational or illogical while you ignore long establish patterns of disorder and degeneracy caused by males as “baked-in” to “normal” society. That is because you are deeply irrational as well, and unable to face that fact that you as males are at least half the source of all our problems. You are unable to view male behavior in an unbiased way.
BTW order itself is not necessarily good. A regime can be evil and corrupt and still orderly. Jews love order. What you want is productivity and efficiency, which is the natural enemy of exploitation and tyranny.
Anyway , just finished imposing order on a messy house belonging to a man whom order seems to have forsaken. Now Im off to impose order on my own back yard with a mower and a rake.
That's not what single mother statistics and metrics show.
Well show them then. Do single moms destroy entire cities? Do single moms conquer and enslave entire nations? How about all violent crime since the earliest recordings of criminal statistics? Lot of single moms in those stats? Exactly how are single white moms destroying more shit than say white male soldiers or white male criminals? Id love to here it.
Point blank; women need to shut their mouths and stay in the home raising children.
Why ? Because youre butt hurt? Thats not a good reason.
You've passed that point, and so you've become a bitter old nag, a cancer on younger females.
This is called bulverism. Do you know what that is?
I asked you to cite. A meme is not a citation. You to link to or name a study.
If your stats are verified, how do they support your assertion that white single moms are the biggest agents of disorder and chaos? Miscegenation? Because genetic analysis of african americans’ mtDNA and Y chromosome haplogroups shows that the majority of the European ancestry in their DNA comes from White males. 1/3 of AA males have European y Chromosomes whereas only about 5% of AA’s have European mtDNA groups.
It's not hard to find. Go look it up, lazy bitch. We're not here to spoon feed you.
The strong effects of the single-mother family and the significant effects of the single-father family lent considerable support to the main hypothesis. With the much stronger effect of the single-mother family than the effect of the single-father family, the results provided strong support for the prevalence hypothesis...
I suppose I can't rely on a woman to look it up, so here you go.
Now queue your crying about the study to deflect from everything else, which you still don't realize makes you into the anecdote exemplar.
I have to interject some fairness here. Women do love to start wars. Some women. Cankles. Stefanik. That jew bitch that took the voluntary out of the draft.
War has historically been 100% a male affair. Now we have a few twats in politics, a few more twats in the armed forces — usually not the ones setting the policy agenda or doing any actual killing. So its more like 99% a male affair now. Cankles probably did have alot of clout. Thatcher was another one. But most female politicians are window dressing. Kamala was a fucking lightweight.
Is Victoria Rotund Nulan a female? And I don't care to hear that she was "just doing the master's bidding." She still destabilized and had murdered a lot of people. Christians in the largest numbers. How about Albright? And Janet Reno?
Were I a historian, I could rattle off more, but while yes men engage in war because that is the nature of man, women loooooooooooove to start shit. I mean, the sheer scope of damage that pigland is responsible for is astounding. What Cankles got her lecherous husband to do in Serbia, killing Christians for the muzzies, well, that's a story, too.
Women are by nature more emotionally motivated. Men are more motivated by logic and reason. You can argue all you want but you are wrong. There are always people outside of the "norm", and you cherry pick those cases to try to make retarded arguments. Anyone reading this sees you literally proving my point by being emotionally charged in your responses as if you are personally be attacked.
As far as sources, they are posted here regularly, you are being purposefully ignorant or you are the biggest retard here. I lean toward the latter because I have rarely seen you exhibit any type of reason or logic other than completely parroted thoughts.
In an ideal world men would be protecting and providing for their families and communities, and women would be producing children. Anything outside of that is a corruption of what is right. You are insane to think that an acknowledgement that men are meant to bring order is somehow me ignoring problems in the world.
Also, you might replace the word "men" with "jews" for much of your reply and you may find that your statements are much more accurate.
This is exactly correct. There is a subset of the famous twin studies dateset that compares identical twins raised by their respective single fathers or mothers. The children raised by their fathers, particularly daughters, performed much better in life. This is why the zog family courts give children to mothers by default, to cripple the children. Of course there are exceptions, because exceptions make the rule.
[ - ] taoV 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:23:41 ago (+1/-0)
Shaming language
Disregarded.
Dishwashers and bread machines will not have a massive rapid impact on the evolution of humans biologically.
Here I disagree. We're seeing the results of the impact now, as it has changed the dynamic between the sexes. People who use the advent of these things to help eschew traditional relationships are adjusting toward r-selected genetics. While it's tempting to say that aritifical wombs would accelerate this process, they will actually do the inverse. What men will use them? The ones who could not have a family by being good providers to women who feel they don't need men. If you're consistent in your arguments you'll support the use of artifical wombs for the White race.
women, who have been selected for child rearing traits
You're lost in abstraction. Look at the ever decreasing evidnece for this. What we see is runaway evolution due to technology, with women increasingly losing caregiving traits. Artifical wombs are just the next step in that chess game, and will select for those men more likely to desire to be providers, and if needed caregivers. After artificial wombs, women will be at the point of the peakock's tail: unable to evolve further in this direction as the costs associated with it outweigh their contribution to the species.
A dishwasher doesn’t change the nature of women , any more than powertools change the nature of men
Disagree on both points for similar reasons that I won't belabor.
Even when they have children the single-mom isn't just a meme. They still go off the rocker, just slightly less crazy. Women need a man to ensure she doesn't go insane and destroy civilization.
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 11:03:53 ago (+1/-0)
excuse my interruption here, but you and I have been on the same site for like ten years now, and we very rarely have interacted with each other, which is ok, but I was just wondering if you were on the woahverse or when you came to find voat.
It just struck me, when I saw you replied to me, that you never ever reply to anything I say, even though I know I have seen your thoughts in posts all over voat and its incarnations for like a decade now.
It just strikes me as kind of wierd that we live in the same universe or orbit or community here online and never ineteract, aint it?
is it intentional?
You're insane anyways.
I just had the thought occur to me seeing you respond to something I said. That's never happened before. and it freaked me out LoL
Im not sure what a woahverse is. I found Voat because it was right wing and uncensored. Im right wing.
A searchvoat query shows I replied to you 11 times. Its a pretty low number I’ll admit. You have replied to me 18 times. I don’t know what your user name was on poal or voat. Maybe I replied to you more then?
No its not intentional, on my part. You don’t stand out to me as a particularly odious user. Now that you have pointed out my oversight though, I will try to give you more of my insane attention.
Almost all construction work is done by men, and construction work is the deadliest industry in America by total deaths. A solid majority of agricultural work is done by men, and the deadliest jobs within agriculture have almost entirely male workers, and agriculture is the deadliest industry by deaths per hour worked.
Without men literally risking our lives every day and dying years younger than women on average, there would be no food and shelter. And all we ask of women is that they pick a hard working man and make more of him, but that's too much to ask of too many women today.
[ - ] 15MAR 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:37:53 ago (+2/-1)
The idea of absolute autonomy is a symptom of the erosion of racial/national consciousness within our people. When thinking in terms of race or nation, nobody is just an individual, but instead a member of a team; a "nation of individuals" is inherently oxymoronic.
The elites have poisoned our people such that most, even self-proclaimed "nationalists," see themselves just as individuals fighting by themselves against Clown World. The little unity that exists within right wing circles is constantly hampered by in-fighting, one of the major examples being the war between men and women.
To address this problem, we must understand it fully, and to do so means admitting that there are valid grievances that both sides have, as with all other axes of dividing the White race (like the generational divide). Nothing exists within a vacuum, and the elites simply exploited weaknesses within our people that were already present. The fact of the matter is neither men nor women just started hating each other one day without reason.
In solving this as with any divide, both sides must admit their shortcomings, and afterwards realize that a failure of one is a failure of all, as per racially conscious thinking. Realizing that a failure of one is a failure of all nullifies the argument over which subgroup is "right," and instead restores group cohesion. Therefore, fixing the divide is as simple as agreeing to the terms of teamwork once more, and facing the problem as such.
In my opinion, the parameters of the "team" should be: "All Whites that are or can become racially conscious, that have not betrayed the White race, are welcome."
Forcing jaded, demoralized people into their natural roles is simply putting the cart before the horse, to say the least.
Men must Fight, die for, build, and maintain a functional society with functioning infrastructure. We as men dedicate our blood sweat and tears to all of the above, not because we want to do so, but because it is our responsibility to do so as men. Women can’t just benefit from our sacrifices and ignore their end of the deal. Their purpose on this earth is to birth the next generation of humans so society can move forward, and provide a healthy environment for our kids to grow up in. The selfish feminist mindset has now superseded what their true purpose is, and if we don’t force that situation to change, society will collapse, millions will die, simple as that. Feminism is a cancer that must be removed, all of our lives depend on it.
The problem is the second part is bullshit. Napoleon came up with that bullshit and it's what lead to societies facing total war over the political whims of their leaders.
Families don't need 10 kids to work the farm anymore, nor to have at least a handful of kids live to adulthood due to understanding medicine better.
Humans do not need to continually spawn. Boom and bust population cycles are a part of nature, but humans have never had a bust population cycle - ever. That is what is unnatural.
Humans have tamed nature to the point where there is no risk to the population even including wars that have claimed millions and millions, and still the populations grow higher.
What is the point of overpopulating? Quality of life is dropping significantly each year due to population growth.
Guess some people just like that "quantity over quality" mentality.
This is a fair argument for humanity overall, but the white race has a declining population and is entering a bust cycle while non-whites flood our countries. Secure the border, deport nonwhites, and execute all kikes worldwide, and then we can stop worrying about birth rates and let the population find a natural equilibrium birth rate.
Love, how many men tell the girl they knocked up to get an abortion and give her the money, the ride and back? I will just say it again. It takes 2 to make a thing work. People should be very picky about who they hook up with, don't you think?
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 4 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:42:55 ago (+6/-2)
Let’s agree that women have an obligation to have and raise children in the way that men have an obligation to work productive jobs.
Women should have autonomy over their bodies in the same way that men should have autonomy over who they work for and what work they do. We should never force anyone into pregnancy (rape) or force one man to be enslaved to another. These are both forms of slavery.
Im not talking about abortion. People that get themselves pregnant by choosing to have sex should not get to kill their babies. Thats not autonomy, thats murder.
The draft is totally unnecessary. Stop blaming women for what wealthy men do to poor men. War is groups of men organized to steal shit from each other so they can have more wealth and better women. Its an overwhelmingly male phenomenon.
If you want to cast our struggle to rebuild society as some male vs female conflict then know this: war is caused by men. If you want to end it to improve the lot of men, it is on men to do so. It is preposterous to insist women as a species owe men for men warring with other men. Im not having it. Men need to stop fighting brother wars for other wealthy powerful men for shekels. You are causing your own problem there.
What fresh jewish hell is this? Artificial wombs? Yeah. Thats just a great idea. Whats that going to do to the evolution of the human race? Who’s gonna raise these babies? Men? Bad idea.
[ + ] taoV
[ - ] taoV 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 12:35:27 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 2 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:43:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] taoV
[ - ] taoV 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:35:19 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:35:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:01:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:04:45 ago (+2/-1)
Stop. You are talking like a feminist. How would you feel if I said “you men sure enjoy rape!” Theres all kinds of women in the world, we’re all different. We’re like people that way.
Dishwashers and bread machines will not have a massive rapid impact on the evolution of humans biologically. Artificial wombs will. You will be obviating the need for women for gestation. So then men will in some cases be the sole parents to children. Men are not behaviorally predisposed to raise children. They don’t have the instincts. If they did they would act like women, who have been selected for child rearing traits. Not men. For a while you would have alot of dead or psychologically damaged children. But eventually males would begin to be selected for maternal traits. Think on that. You guys love to circle jerk about how rational and superior your male brain is. Its not good at what women do. You are selected for bring home the bacon traits. Kill or be killed traits. Not good for taking care of babies. Are you willing to steer the male species toward a less masculine future? That would happen after a few centuries as men became more like women. Evolving to be better moms will have cognitive tradeoffs for men.
A dishwasher doesn’t change the nature of women , any more than powertools change the nature of men. Artificial wombs are a whole other ballgame.
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 4 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:30:02 ago (+4/-0)
Women are predisposed to nurture and empathize, and for infants that is very necessary.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:50:05 ago (+1/-0)
Most single fathers don't become single fathers until after their kids reach school age. Many single mothers are that way from the start. Plenty of men would have difficulty with the diaper changing phase of raising a baby, and postwallhag has a point there.
Also, most single fathers are white, while single mothers are more likely to either be another race or have mixed kids. Mixed and nonwhite kids have worse outcomes because they're niggers. I'm not aware of any study that adjusted for the race of the child and single parent. And while single fathers have kids with lower crime rates, better educational attainment, and higher average income, single mothers have kids with stronger interpersonal relationship skills. There are tradeoffs.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 2 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:18:12 ago (+2/-0)
But I'm agreeing with you on everything else.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 18:05:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 19:59:48 ago (+0/-0)
Even though the majority of theives rapists and murders throughout history were men? Even though the majority of tyrants and enslavers down through the ages were men, and men are drawn to wars to murder their brothers like a moth to a flame? Is male evil really rational? What qualifies as crazy to you?
Males are as insane as women and more dangerous.
Do you believe in evolution? Why would evolution favor females to be “insane”? Is there a purpose to it? Males kill each other because it creates a reproductive advantage to eliminate their sexual competiton and steal each other’s resources. Not rational but purposeful even if you are unaware of why you do it. Its the insanity of testosterone.
Estrogen also provokes some insane behavior but it too has a purpose. Maleness and femaleness are far older than the human race. That is why male dogs and male horses have comparable behavioral traits to human males and the same with females. The horomones prime humans for reproductively useful behaviors. Males have never been the primary caretakers of children and are not selected to excel at it. Once again goats are heavy on opinion and light on logic in this thread. The psychological makeup of women is designed to make her a better parent then a male. Not every single one, but on average.
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 20:56:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:06:02 ago (+0/-0)
Oh? cite please.
You sound like a fortune cookie. Men are the biggest bringers of order and also of disorder. All war and most crime and violence is perpetrated by men. The drug trade is overwhelmingly created by men. Usury is overwhlemingly perpetrated by men. Shitty corporations are overwhelmingly run by men. If you want to give credit to men for all their great projects of order you are going to have to own all the chaos and destruction and disorder caused by men. You guys constantly cherry pick “female” sources of disorder as evidence that women are inherently irrational or illogical while you ignore long establish patterns of disorder and degeneracy caused by males as “baked-in” to “normal” society. That is because you are deeply irrational as well, and unable to face that fact that you as males are at least half the source of all our problems. You are unable to view male behavior in an unbiased way.
BTW order itself is not necessarily good. A regime can be evil and corrupt and still orderly. Jews love order. What you want is productivity and efficiency, which is the natural enemy of exploitation and tyranny.
Anyway , just finished imposing order on a messy house belonging to a man whom order seems to have forsaken. Now Im off to impose order on my own back yard with a mower and a rake.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:10:45 ago (+1/-0)
That's not what single mother statistics and metrics show.
Point blank; women need to shut their mouths and stay in the home raising children.
You've passed that point, and so you've become a bitter old nag, a cancer on younger females.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 19:14:09 ago (+1/-0)
Well show them then. Do single moms destroy entire cities? Do single moms conquer and enslave entire nations? How about all violent crime since the earliest recordings of criminal statistics? Lot of single moms in those stats? Exactly how are single white moms destroying more shit than say white male soldiers or white male criminals? Id love to here it.
Why ? Because youre butt hurt? Thats not a good reason.
This is called bulverism. Do you know what that is?
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 19:17:37 ago (+0/-0)
It's not hard to find.
Go look it up, lazy bitch.
We're not here to spoon feed you.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 19:42:58 ago (+1/-0)
If your stats are verified, how do they support your assertion that white single moms are the biggest agents of disorder and chaos? Miscegenation? Because genetic analysis of african americans’ mtDNA and Y chromosome haplogroups shows that the majority of the European ancestry in their DNA comes from White males. 1/3 of AA males have European y Chromosomes whereas only about 5% of AA’s have European mtDNA groups.
Its on you to back up your own data. Yeah.
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 19:55:37 ago (+0/-0)
I suppose I can't rely on a woman to look it up, so here you go.
Now queue your crying about the study to deflect from everything else, which you still don't realize makes you into the anecdote exemplar.
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:24:28 ago (+0/-0)
Cankles. Stefanik. That jew bitch that took the voluntary out of the draft.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 19:25:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 16:27:32 ago (+0/-0)
Were I a historian, I could rattle off more, but while yes men engage in war because that is the nature of man, women loooooooooooove to start shit. I mean, the sheer scope of damage that pigland is responsible for is astounding. What Cankles got her lecherous husband to do in Serbia, killing Christians for the muzzies, well, that's a story, too.
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 20:49:45 ago (+0/-0)
As far as sources, they are posted here regularly, you are being purposefully ignorant or you are the biggest retard here. I lean toward the latter because I have rarely seen you exhibit any type of reason or logic other than completely parroted thoughts.
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 20:51:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] firestation7
[ - ] firestation7 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 20:54:47 ago (+0/-0)
Also, you might replace the word "men" with "jews" for much of your reply and you may find that your statements are much more accurate.
[ + ] nibnab
[ - ] nibnab 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 14:22:59 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] taoV
[ - ] taoV 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:23:41 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:41:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 17:09:58 ago (+1/-0)
Accurate
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 3 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 12:30:02 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 3 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:02:18 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:08:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:47:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 2 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:40:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:44:06 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 2 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:56:05 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 11:34:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 12:23:51 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:44:43 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 11:03:53 ago (+1/-0)
It just struck me, when I saw you replied to me, that you never ever reply to anything I say, even though I know I have seen your thoughts in posts all over voat and its incarnations for like a decade now.
It just strikes me as kind of wierd that we live in the same universe or orbit or community here online and never ineteract, aint it?
is it intentional?
You're insane anyways.
I just had the thought occur to me seeing you respond to something I said. That's never happened before. and it freaked me out LoL
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 11:31:55 ago (+1/-0)
A searchvoat query shows I replied to you 11 times. Its a pretty low number I’ll admit. You have replied to me 18 times. I don’t know what your user name was on poal or voat. Maybe I replied to you more then?
No its not intentional, on my part. You don’t stand out to me as a particularly odious user. Now that you have pointed out my oversight though, I will try to give you more of my insane attention.
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 17:11:51 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:42:26 ago (+2/-1)
Without men literally risking our lives every day and dying years younger than women on average, there would be no food and shelter. And all we ask of women is that they pick a hard working man and make more of him, but that's too much to ask of too many women today.
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 20:58:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 15MAR
[ - ] 15MAR 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:37:53 ago (+2/-1)
The elites have poisoned our people such that most, even self-proclaimed "nationalists," see themselves just as individuals fighting by themselves against Clown World. The little unity that exists within right wing circles is constantly hampered by in-fighting, one of the major examples being the war between men and women.
To address this problem, we must understand it fully, and to do so means admitting that there are valid grievances that both sides have, as with all other axes of dividing the White race (like the generational divide). Nothing exists within a vacuum, and the elites simply exploited weaknesses within our people that were already present. The fact of the matter is neither men nor women just started hating each other one day without reason.
In solving this as with any divide, both sides must admit their shortcomings, and afterwards realize that a failure of one is a failure of all, as per racially conscious thinking. Realizing that a failure of one is a failure of all nullifies the argument over which subgroup is "right," and instead restores group cohesion. Therefore, fixing the divide is as simple as agreeing to the terms of teamwork once more, and facing the problem as such.
In my opinion, the parameters of the "team" should be: "All Whites that are or can become racially conscious, that have not betrayed the White race, are welcome."
Forcing jaded, demoralized people into their natural roles is simply putting the cart before the horse, to say the least.
[ + ] prototype
[ - ] prototype 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 01:34:43 ago (+0/-0)
Good luck drafting anyone in my family.
People often like to say "over my dead body."
I'm fond of saying "over yours."
[ + ] Warden
[ - ] Warden 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 17:30:10 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:05:40 ago (+0/-0)
So no. Fuack yew.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 14:47:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 12:11:29 ago (+1/-1)
The nature of work is changing.
Families don't need 10 kids to work the farm anymore, nor to have at least a handful of kids live to adulthood due to understanding medicine better.
Humans do not need to continually spawn. Boom and bust population cycles are a part of nature, but humans have never had a bust population cycle - ever. That is what is unnatural.
Humans have tamed nature to the point where there is no risk to the population even including wars that have claimed millions and millions, and still the populations grow higher.
What is the point of overpopulating? Quality of life is dropping significantly each year due to population growth.
Guess some people just like that "quantity over quality" mentality.
[ + ] NaturalSelectionistWorker
[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 13:53:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:29:37 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:57:30 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 08:29:49 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes [op] 2 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 08:36:00 ago (+2/-0)
Interesting so all her transgressions are forgiven by her willingness to participate in childbearing.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 1 point 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:41:42 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:06:30 ago (+0/-0)
They do well to believe. But we are to do the majority of the thinking and believing for them.
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 16:35:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 16:38:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 16:41:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 16:57:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 16:58:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 17:00:28 ago (+0/-0)
I see exactly how you women 'work'.
[ + ] jfroybees
[ - ] jfroybees 0 points 7 monthsNov 9, 2024 17:05:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 10:21:06 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 -1 points 7 monthsNov 8, 2024 16:04:44 ago (+0/-1)