Is it worth going to war over a squirrel? No, probably not. Is it worth going to war for your slaughtered family member? I'd argue that it is.
As silly as it may seem to those who don't appreciate pets and animals, that squirrel and raccoon were part of this couple's family. Imagine the cops showing up to your house, snatching your child, killing them just to check for a disease that they obviously don't have, and... that's it, you're left to continue your life as you choose.
Wouldn't it be something if Peanut and the raccoon (Fred? I forget his name) become symbols for our side of the inevitable civil war. Imagine his image on banners and medals. Peanut is a martyr, a perfect illustration of how out of control our government is, and how disgusting roughly 1/2 of the people in this country are.
I got some weird vibes listening to him talk. I guess that was it? Other red flags I've noticed: look at all the tattoos on the woman. All over her neck- neck tattoos are a massive red flag. These two people might be disgusting sexual degenerates, BUT, that doesn't mean you fucking kill their pets.
Wrong spelling. It's supposedly a different woman, but no one seems to have screenshots or links to any of her 'confessions'. Also, the guy has an onlyfans porno account that generated the $800K used to buy the property.
That and more. Some make a million per month. TBF, most average a few hundred bucks, but that's probably because they're unattractive or have a poor act. What that reveals though is there sure are a lot of men who've totally given up on the value of self-respect.
There seems to have been a lot of people that really cared for that squirrel, but I honestly never even heard of this guy or the squirrel until after the feeds started blowing up with the announcement that the poor thing had been euthanized.
I think what's going on is somewhat similar to that phenomenon that South Park predicted about how outrage posting works. Some people hear some news and take it really personally, and others just jump on to have something in common with other people that seem like they're promoting a decent agenda, but really it's just about finding ways to avoid looking at the heart of the matter.
People aren't angry about a squirrel. They are angry about armed government agents busting into someone's house, harassing the occupants for hours, and killing their pets. All for the audacity of owning said pet without paying them enough money.
I am thinking the "Khaddaffi" punishment would be justified in this case. For this bitch and anyone who had a hand in killing of Peanut and the Raccoon.
Okay theres a witchhunt for this chick. Maybe well deserved. But consider that alot of people do not understand how government works and think that bureacracy will facilitate a just outcome. She may not have anticipated this denouement. The real problem is the government agency that killed the squirrel and the individuals that worked for it.
taking actions for emotional reasons and lacking foresight!
A phenomenon observed throughout history. Hardly a particularly female trait. Hey thanks for shipping niggers to america in exchange for rum and shekels, men. Lots of foresight going on there.
Yeah, Im going to point out your hypocrisy, your cherry picking, and your double standards every single time. Its pertinent to your thesis. Is that news?
I wasn’t talking to goatfugee. What do you not understand. Im talking to you. As if my reply isn’t pertinent to every comment you post here about women? It is. Every. Single. Time.
Now go get checked for Toxoplasma Ig, I think you’re having a flare up.
Looks like she gets a double lesson then. She didn’t realize the government being a problem nor did she realize the people would want to display her head on a pike.
Why would she think the government is a problem after all of this? They did exactly what she wanted. I have no doubt that this bitch was envious of the couple who were victimized here: she describes herself as a "conservationist", but there is very little evidence that she was involved in such activities.
However, the couple who owned Peanut have a ranch for taking care of all sorts of animals. They named it after Peanut- this couple are ACTUAL conservationists who care about wildlife and put a lot of effort into caring for them. My guess is that Ms Monica Keasler was very jealoous, envious even, of the success of the couple running the Peanut social media accounts. So, she weaponized the state and used them to destroy the wonderful little life that Peanut an Fred had with these two people. It went exactly as she wanted- they took the animals away from the couple forever.
She should be happy with this outcome. What was she expecting when she made the call? Her motivation was to get the pets taken away... what happens to pets that are seized at gunpoint? Do they live long, happy lives in captivity? No, they are killed and their brain sliced up to check for "rabies", regardless of whether the animal is symptomatic or not.
I don't need to ask her to know what she wanted. I just have to look at what she did- she made a phone call to an organization that will seize people's pets if they're tipped off about "potential abuse". Her complaint was that she believed there was "animal exploitation" happening in that household.
Given that she's a self-described conservationist, she has likely dealt with these agencies before. And in New York, too, one of the most fucked places on earth. She knew the animals would be taken. Are you suggesting that she didn't know what the consequences of making that call was?
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 5 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:58:40 ago (+5/-0)
As silly as it may seem to those who don't appreciate pets and animals, that squirrel and raccoon were part of this couple's family. Imagine the cops showing up to your house, snatching your child, killing them just to check for a disease that they obviously don't have, and... that's it, you're left to continue your life as you choose.
Wouldn't it be something if Peanut and the raccoon (Fred? I forget his name) become symbols for our side of the inevitable civil war. Imagine his image on banners and medals. Peanut is a martyr, a perfect illustration of how out of control our government is, and how disgusting roughly 1/2 of the people in this country are.
[ + ] 2017Fallout
[ - ] 2017Fallout 0 points 6 monthsNov 12, 2024 03:35:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] feminismisculturedeath
[ - ] feminismisculturedeath 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:17:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:59:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] recon_johnny
[ - ] recon_johnny 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:00:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:30:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dass
[ - ] dass 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 14:48:31 ago (+1/-0)
Jesus hell and mary.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 15:41:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BulletStopper
[ - ] BulletStopper 7 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 11:09:26 ago (+7/-0)
"Nuts out for Peanut and Fred!"
[ + ] Jimmycrackerson
[ - ] Jimmycrackerson 2 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 10:54:08 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AlexanderMorose13
[ - ] AlexanderMorose13 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 10:18:19 ago (+1/-0)
I think what's going on is somewhat similar to that phenomenon that South Park predicted about how outrage posting works. Some people hear some news and take it really personally, and others just jump on to have something in common with other people that seem like they're promoting a decent agenda, but really it's just about finding ways to avoid looking at the heart of the matter.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 3 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 12:57:31 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:32:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 2017Fallout
[ - ] 2017Fallout 0 points 6 monthsNov 12, 2024 03:37:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] kammmmak
[ - ] kammmmak 2 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 09:33:32 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Nosferatjew
[ - ] Nosferatjew 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 15:18:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 2 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 08:52:29 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 3 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 09:44:31 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 09:46:19 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 08:18:24 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] goatfugee12
[ - ] goatfugee12 5 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 09:53:19 ago (+5/-0)
repeal the 19th!
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 11:00:24 ago (+0/-0)
A phenomenon observed throughout history. Hardly a particularly female trait. Hey thanks for shipping niggers to america in exchange for rum and shekels, men. Lots of foresight going on there.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 13:15:43 ago (+3/-0)
Every. Single. Time.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 14:41:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 15:44:05 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 17:03:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 17:38:08 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 20:21:18 ago (+0/-0)
Now go get checked for Toxoplasma Ig, I think you’re having a flare up.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 20:38:18 ago (+0/-0)
Yup it's helena time.
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 08:56:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 14:04:17 ago (+1/-0)
However, the couple who owned Peanut have a ranch for taking care of all sorts of animals. They named it after Peanut- this couple are ACTUAL conservationists who care about wildlife and put a lot of effort into caring for them. My guess is that Ms Monica Keasler was very jealoous, envious even, of the success of the couple running the Peanut social media accounts. So, she weaponized the state and used them to destroy the wonderful little life that Peanut an Fred had with these two people. It went exactly as she wanted- they took the animals away from the couple forever.
She should be happy with this outcome. What was she expecting when she made the call? Her motivation was to get the pets taken away... what happens to pets that are seized at gunpoint? Do they live long, happy lives in captivity? No, they are killed and their brain sliced up to check for "rabies", regardless of whether the animal is symptomatic or not.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 14:44:21 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 1 point 6 monthsNov 11, 2024 15:01:55 ago (+1/-0)
Given that she's a self-described conservationist, she has likely dealt with these agencies before. And in New York, too, one of the most fucked places on earth. She knew the animals would be taken. Are you suggesting that she didn't know what the consequences of making that call was?