You'd think he'd be posting all about how this lone wolf attacker is getting away with killing a CEO. Yet he's strangely quiet. I guess lone wolves murdering innocent people is okay with Joe, but he draws the line at mega millionaire CEO's.
Well, Free, you have Joe Biden, and you have Joe McCarthy. Pick one. The reason Voat poster Joe Mccarthy doesn't root for the CEO's death is because he is an officer of the law and respects our laws. But you already know, or suspect that, don't ya?
Be careful in judging "innocence"! (((Insurance companies))) ruin peoples lives! You don't know the sh**ters story! Maybe, someone put a H|t on him! Let's find out more before assigning blame!
[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 1 point 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 08:16:16 ago (+1/-0)
Where did I suggest that the CEO was innocent?
Joe routinely posts bullshit about how lone gunman are gonna kick off a civil war by hurting innocent people, starting fires, sabotaging utilities, etc.
Yet, when a shooter takes out a high profile target and the people seem to rejoice, Joe is oddly quiet.
I would suggest that if you're gonna go do a random act of violence, these types of targets are best. These people are far less likely to be innocent. Absolutely complicit in a the downgrading of the human condition.
So, the shooter left casing with the words deny, defend and depose (??) written in them, which they say is a possible reference to a book about the shitshow Healthcare system that we have in this country. In that book, it turns out United Healthcare denies 1 out of every 3 claims made for coverage. It reminds me of that movie "Rainmaker". In that movie, the company was found liable for fraud. They would deny claims knowing that the determination would rarely be challenged even if it was a legit claim.
I'd suggest that if he's a CEO of a company that is denying medical claims out of hand, just as a part of procedure, he's guilty of being a total piece of shit and deserves what he got, whether or not he any broke any actual laws, which if that's the case, I'm sure he did.
I'm not a big fan of vigilante-ism, but if you're gonna be a vigilante, he was probably a good pick to go after. I'm sure we'll find out more about this in the coming weeks, months, but on its face it sure does look like a vengeance killing for a claims denial.
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 2 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 12:42:39 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 12:48:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 13:06:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] beece
[ - ] beece 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 13:56:51 ago (+0/-0)
The end.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 14:04:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 08:11:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 1 point 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 08:16:16 ago (+1/-0)
Joe routinely posts bullshit about how lone gunman are gonna kick off a civil war by hurting innocent people, starting fires, sabotaging utilities, etc.
Yet, when a shooter takes out a high profile target and the people seem to rejoice, Joe is oddly quiet.
I would suggest that if you're gonna go do a random act of violence, these types of targets are best. These people are far less likely to be innocent. Absolutely complicit in a the downgrading of the human condition.
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 08:19:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 1 point 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 08:22:03 ago (+1/-0)
Joe is okay with hurting innocent people. Joe is oddly quiet when it comes to millionaire CEO's... (who aren't as innocent).
[ + ] iSnark
[ - ] iSnark 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 08:25:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 09:24:26 ago (+0/-0)
Joe is okay with innocent people being harmed, but draws the line at rich CEO's.
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 12:50:21 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 13:11:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 4 monthsDec 6, 2024 14:15:05 ago (+0/-0)
I'd suggest that if he's a CEO of a company that is denying medical claims out of hand, just as a part of procedure, he's guilty of being a total piece of shit and deserves what he got, whether or not he any broke any actual laws, which if that's the case, I'm sure he did.
I'm not a big fan of vigilante-ism, but if you're gonna be a vigilante, he was probably a good pick to go after. I'm sure we'll find out more about this in the coming weeks, months, but on its face it sure does look like a vengeance killing for a claims denial.