×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
50

Grandpa shoots walmart drone that was stalking his house.

submitted by Dingo to whatever 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:11:54 ago (+50/-0)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/bcg51h.mp4

This whole situation seems very sketchy to me, but grandpa carried himself with dignity and honor.

Can someone please explain to me why what he did was 'illegal'? What about the right to privacy and defending your home, etc?


123 comments block


[ - ] BloodyComet 18 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:50:58 ago (+19/-1)

Shouldn't have admitted shit to that cop. If they came asking questions about this, tell them to talk to your lawyer and go away.

I'm certain a decent public defender could turn this around, but if you admit to everything on bodycam, you're screwed. It sucks that we have to live like this, afraid to defend our own property and privacy because we'll be fucking thrown into prison.

This cop says he's in "a lot" of trouble. I don't understand why- this should be treated like peeping, and I think you're pretty well within your rights to shoot someone in the face if they're standing in your yard, staring through your window.

The way the law should work, to protect self-defenders, is that the next action that a criminal will take will lead to the WORST POSSIBLE OUTCOME. But it's like the courts expect you to read a criminal's mind, and that you MUST TRUST THE CRIMINAL not to hurt you or use what they've stolen from you against you somehow. Fuck that. If someone kicks my door in, why can't I assume they mean to kill me and steal everything in the building?

[ - ] VitaminSieg 5 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 20:49:17 ago (+5/-0)

If someone kicks my door in, why can't I assume they mean to kill me and steal everything in the building?

Because they're sanctioned by the government and there to ruin or kill you Legally.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 7 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 21:49:28 ago (+7/-0)

Remember folks, White genocide is done legally.

[ - ] hylo 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 23:51:54 ago (+2/-0)

Yes, hold still and peacefully receive death!

[ - ] Kozel 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 17:55:47 ago (+3/-1)

shooting at a drone is a federal crime

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:12:27 ago (+3/-1)

What about a health executives shot by alphabet agencies?

[ - ] Love240 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:06:02 ago (+2/-1)

OH NO! HOW TERRIBLE!

[ - ] rabidR04CH 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 20:11:05 ago (+2/-0)

Agreed that there is no way talking to a cop ever ends well. He would have been better off immediately contacting his lawyer.

[ - ] Rowdybme 0 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 00:44:37 ago (+0/-0)

Some people don't have the capacity to lie. I'm one of them.

[ - ] shadowwolf225 2 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 01:54:57 ago (+2/-0)

Don't lie brother. I respect honesty. Just don't speak. Why do you think it's referred to as the "right to remain silent"? Lying to a cop is a crime. Not answering their questions isn't and is still morally righteous. Its also Something that many God fearing men have died to protect our right to do.

It's not easy. But it's the right move.

[ - ] shadowwolf225 0 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 01:45:51 ago (+0/-0)

Shouldn't have spoken to the cop or opened the door at all. Did he ask them to come? Then don't invite the state to a game of "how screwed do i get today?" for ZERO reason.

If they have the right to enter (legally a warrant) they will.

The courts actually expect that anyone who knows the law will never risk self incrimination because to do so is the legal equivalent of giving your beretta a blowjob. They also expect that anyone less intelligent or learned will be profitable for them and make sure they're well paid.


The laws regarding engaging low-flying peeping drones do need to be changed and I have been flying remote aircraft for thirty years. I'm not a jackass with it though.

[ - ] kammmmak 10 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:52:32 ago (+13/-3)

What a stupid White old man. NEVER talk to police. Just say you do not wish to partake in an investigation and to get off your property but firstly stay inside your home and DO NOT answer the door.

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 5 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 17:55:57 ago (+7/-2)

boomers think police are our friends and that jews are our best allies

[ - ] Looneyskiproony 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 20:46:34 ago (+1/-0)

Not all of them.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 3 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 21:50:04 ago (+4/-1)

Enough to fuck the next 3 generations over.

[ - ] FuckShitJesus 1 point 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 08:42:39 ago (+1/-0)

Essentially all of them, so the outliers really don't matter.

[ - ] Clubberlang -2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:13:14 ago (+0/-2)

Oyyyyyy Veyyyy goy! Dey ahhh eeen weee ahhhh! Kvetch!

[ - ] lord_nougat 10 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:24:44 ago (+10/-0)

9mm is a silly choice. His crime is not using the [right tool for the right job.](https://files.catbox.moe/lwzk4e.webp)

[ - ] registereduser 5 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:27:16 ago (+6/-1)

His crime is not killing every last cop they send and then going down to walmart droneport and killing all of them too.

[ - ] lord_nougat 8 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:51:48 ago (+8/-0)

He's just waiting for you to show him how its done and then he'll step in and cover your six.

[ - ] Belrial 3 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:03:25 ago (+4/-1)

According to the article he hit the payload. Looks like he used what he had.

[ - ] beece 9 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 17:32:19 ago (+9/-0)

For anyone who needs a refresher or don't know why the old guy tripped on his dick, here's Professor James Duane's "Don't Talk to the Police" explaining it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 5 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:59:42 ago (+5/-0)

Here's a better, more concise recommendation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkN4duV4ia0&rco=1

[ - ] shadowwolf225 1 point 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 01:33:03 ago (+1/-0)

More concise, maybe. Better? nah. The original gives relevant context that supports why shutting the fuck up IS ALWAYS the right answer. That said, I totally support STFU friday and every other day.

Police are generally lazy fucks and I sure as fuck ain't doing their job for them. The fact that I'm forced at gunpoint to pay them is bad enough without bending over and winking at them.

[ - ] shadowwolf225 1 point 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 01:25:45 ago (+1/-0)

This video has kept many a man out of prison. I know a solid dozen personally.

[ - ] rzr97 7 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 20:28:29 ago (+7/-0)

"I can't breathe. I can't breathe. I can't breathe." Even the cops are laughing because everyone knows this is such bullshit.

[ - ] Theo 7 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:46:39 ago (+7/-0)

Rights can be forfeited by responding as if they did not exist. IOW you've got to assert them if they are relevant.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:55:51 ago (+0/-1)

Any concept of right, offered by and guaranteed by another, endures only as long as they choose to provide it.
It's a fucking illusion.
If you cannot assert your concept of right as a matter of your personal will, it does not exist.
Rights were a European ideal, wholly artificial constructs meant to govern European men in European societies.
The United States of America is no longer a European society, it' s an emergent third world economic zone.

[ - ] Theo 0 points 6 monthsDec 14, 2024 17:39:33 ago (+0/-0)

Natural rights as described by Blackstone are not dependant on personal will.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 6 monthsDec 14, 2024 20:22:50 ago (+0/-0)

What you're referencing are defined as privileges, not rights, irrespective of the rhetoric the corporation chooses to employ.

[ - ] Theo 0 points 6 monthsDec 14, 2024 20:40:52 ago (+0/-0)

No, Blackstone calls them rights, and corporations don't have them.

Those rights then which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislature has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 6 monthsDec 14, 2024 20:59:21 ago (+0/-0)*

You're lost in your indoctrination.
Beyond that, you're also mistaken in your belief that what Blackstone calls them is at all relevant; one man's treatise does not dictate the fundamental expression of reality.
What you are speaking of are privileges, ideals really, that are created and granted by the social constructs of man.

A Law exists independent of belief and to the best of our knowledge cannot be broken by any action, any choice, made by man.
There are four of them that we know of; that of strong nuclear force, weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetic force.

No animal can be demonstrated to have a right to life that is recognized in a state of nature; indeed it can be taken rather easily; randomly, accidentally, for cause, or for the pleasure killing itself. There is no prohibition on the act of killing outside of societal constructs and even then, in every instance - the only thing that matters to society is the reason for doing so.
Similarly, no animal has a right to liberty as expressed in nature... The concept of liberty itself not inherent in natural world but rather one created and defined by human societies through laws, social norms, and political systems.





[ - ] Theo 0 points 6 monthsDec 15, 2024 04:32:36 ago (+0/-0)

You're projecting.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 6 monthsDec 15, 2024 06:07:30 ago (+0/-0)

No, I was giving you more credit than you deserve.
You're simply incompetent to the conversation.

[ - ] Theo -1 points 6 monthsDec 15, 2024 17:50:19 ago (+0/-1)

Says the fuckwit with no point to make.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 6 monthsDec 15, 2024 18:16:15 ago (+0/-0)*

The point was already made.
You being unable to discern that proves simply proves my assertion that you're incompetent to the task.
Run along, I'm sure there's a crayon out there that needs eating.

[ - ] rhy 5 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 00:28:04 ago (+5/-0)

I DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS. THAT'S THE END OF THE CONVERSATION

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 6 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:34:26 ago (+6/-0)

Can someone please explain to me why what he did was 'illegal'?

You typically cannot discharge a firearm within 500 feet of a dwelling, and for good reason.

It has been consistently ruled that you do not own the air space above your property.

It has also been consistently ruled that anything in the public view can be photographed.

That said, if your back yard is fenced off and your neighbor points a camera from a elevated position at it, that is an invasion of privacy I believe. <<< it gets fuzzy here, obviously you can look into their yard but recording it is not okay.

I also don't disagree with the guy, the drone was being menacing and no one likes that. Just because it's legal doesn't mean it's right and whatever kid that was operating it maliciously needs a good ass beating.

[ - ] BloodyComet 4 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:53:13 ago (+5/-1)

Why wouldn't flying a drone or any kind of remote-controlled device onto a person's property not be considered trespassing? That drone he saw could've been trying to peep into people's windows and take video of nude people or w/e.

I'm also very curious about the string he described- he said it descended a string, then pulled something up, then he shot at it and it flew off.

I think the cops want to protect drones because they use them. Shit, that could've been one of theirs for all we know.

[ - ] Clubberlang 4 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:56:50 ago (+4/-0)

It's the string that bigguyfromqueens needs to cut in NYC.

[ - ] BloodyComet 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:22:19 ago (+0/-0)

I think I'm missing some lore here.

[ - ] Merlynn 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 23:18:28 ago (+2/-1)

There's a string encircling a huge chunk of New York that the jews believe protects them from pissing off god. As long as the string is up,they believe they can do whatever they want and it's "ok" by god.

[ - ] TheYiddler 6 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 06:34:45 ago (+6/-0)

The eruv doesn't let them do anything, it extends their "home" so they can do a few things normally not permitted on the Sabbath. It's still trying to trick their god, but don't lie about what it is.

[ - ] Merlynn -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 15:45:25 ago (+0/-1)

Sure,the jews wouldn't do anything evil or illegal. They just want to use their keys,goyim!

[ - ] TheYiddler 4 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 16:00:44 ago (+4/-0)

That's just normal behavior for jews. Taking down the eruv isn't going to make them stop doing the evil stuff.

[ - ] Merlynn 2 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 16:20:18 ago (+2/-0)

No,but it fucks with them. And that's reason enough.

[ - ] Belrial 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:47:43 ago (+1/-1)

All that is irrelevant. Regardless what the drone is doing you're not authorized to shoot it down. You get a hold of the Flight Standards District Office and file a report. Regardless what sovcit idiots think the FAA will not play with a drone operator making a pain in the ass of himself. The FAA WILL find out who the operator is, then break it off in his ass to the tune of 250k. With remoteID in effect every drone that takes off is broadcasting everything they need to know to find the operator.

[ - ] Peleg 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:58:07 ago (+1/-0)

Well now yes, that's the government approved way of dealing with a trouble maker like this drone operator. The problem here is that practically Nobody knows to do that. What folks do know is they have been watching all these videos of people getting blown to smithereens by drones! Even though it's in a whole different part of the world it still makes people nervous and even scared if some jackass is screwing around with a drone hoovering over them.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:07:39 ago (+0/-1)

What a cuck mentality.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:10:47 ago (+0/-1)

That's what the law says nigger. I don't give half a fuck what your retarded ass thinks of the law, I'm telling you what it says. I can see you revel in complete ignorance and wish you the best because with your attitude and complete ignorance you're not long for a life outside the yard.

[ - ] Love240 -2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:12:48 ago (+0/-2)

Yes, that is indeed what the commercial law says... You done whining?

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:13:53 ago (+0/-1)

Commercial law. You really are an ignorant faggot. Let me guess you're a "sovereign citizen."

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:14:29 ago (+0/-1)

That's an oxymoron, moron.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 21:18:05 ago (+0/-0)

I don't disagree with you at all of course I also believe that trespassers should be shot on sight.

The "law" allows those who are in power to stay in power and for those who can not or will not do for themselves. People just need to use a little common sense and courtesy.

Leave me alone and I'll leave you alone, fuck with me and die. <<< this is where the law intervenes but if it didn't I suspect that we wouldn't have these kind of problems.

[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 21:53:51 ago (+2/-2)

If you don't own the air above your private property then you definitely don't own the air within your lungs

Tyranny just keeps taking and taking.

[ - ] yesiknow -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 16:22:14 ago (+0/-1)

It's been consistently ruled that people should cut their own heads off. Who fuckn cares what a bunch of corrupt and self interested judges rule on anymore

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:15:39 ago (+0/-0)

Correct the social compact has been broken.

[ - ] autotic 5 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:50:39 ago (+6/-1)

Castle Doctrine only applies if you have a threat of violence. Drone in yard...not so much.

Also, don't be a retard and firew a weapon in a residential area over dumb shit.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 20:53:57 ago (+2/-0)

The problem is determining whether a drone is a threat. Right now, it's just doing some consoomerisms, but you won't know drones are threats if you're one of the first targets.

[ - ] shadowwolf225 3 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 01:22:27 ago (+3/-0)

Drone operator. Don't agree with the law but know a little bit about it. Also the operator probably deserved to get his craft blasted. Shits not funny, or cool, or ok. If grandpa can hit your angry bumblebeee with a nine you're too damn close.

Basic version is: drones are considered aircraft federally. That's not exactly wrong. Being an unmanned aircraft doesn't make whole lot of difference, legally.

So with that established. Pops shot (what is legally speaking) a plane out of the sky because it flew over his house. Once again not agreeing just conveying.

Now that we've established what he actually did illegal, we can move to what he did wrong.

Dumbass act the first: using a 9mm on a small UAS (unmanned aerial system). Birdshot is much more effective for the target at hand (not advocating this action, just stating facts.) A 9mm can be lethal to someone innocent downrange even if you hit your intended target. Firing such at an upward angle in a populated area is and really should be illegal. Shits stupid. #8 Birdshot still carries some risk to soft tissue like eyes but generally wont penetrate skin when falling. I know this personally as I've been rained on by such before. It stings but its much more like a red ryder bb gun but softer.

The real 12 IQ, boot licker move: Not using the fact that many men much better than him have literally died so that he can shut the fuck up (or better: not open the door) when he police come to ask questions. This part I do 100% whole heartedly condone: Never EVER for any reason talk to a guy whose job is to find someone with which to charge with a crime, arrest, and imprison. There is absolutely no way him speaking to them would help him because even if what he said totally exonerated him it legally cannot be used for his defense. This was not dignity and honor. This was clueless and reckless with total disregard for the safety of others or the ruthlessness of the state.

If he had shut the fuck up and some how him firing on the UAS had not been witnessed ie when it wasn't pointing at him, there might have been plausible deniability. But a detailed video confession? Dude better hope Jamal is gentle and lets him hold his pocket in the pen.

tldr: Shooting a (legally speaking) plane out of the sky with a nine and then instantly confessing to it on video will get you hemmed up. Don't be dumb.


[ - ] Belrial 0 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:21:46 ago (+1/-1)

He did not shoot it out of the sky he hit its payload. Also the drone was testing delivery systems for Walmart drone deliveries.

You can see this guy was a real rocket scientist who thought "Muh airspace is being violated." Then could not STFU.

[ - ] GreenSaint 3 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:48:12 ago (+3/-0)

Never admit anything to the police ever

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 23:57:23 ago (+1/-0)

Just pull your cock out and show it to them

[ - ] DoYouEvenShit 1 point 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 18:28:19 ago (+1/-0)

shoot the zog bots then, retards

[ - ] ItsOk2bArian 2 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 02:49:49 ago (+2/-0)

He did the nigger Floyd "I can't breeve" line!
That's fuckin' rock solid comedy right there.
Old man put himself in a world of hurt by admitting to the crime, but he kept it mighty white and made me laugh so boomer wins in my book no matter what charges they throw at him

[ - ] PoundOfFlesh 2 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 02:43:12 ago (+2/-0)

Stupid old man thought the zogbots were his friends.

Next time if you're going to shoot something, shoot a nigger, faggot, or kike. Or just shoot a niggerfaggotkike.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 3 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 16:15:12 ago (+3/-0)

fuckin dumbass

[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 23:54:27 ago (+3/-1)

oy vey we got a goyim who fights back betta add some felony federal charges oy vey

[ - ] Sector2 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 15:05:18 ago (+2/-0)

Most cities and suburbs prohibit the use of firearms within their territory. Shooting straight up is probably another charge like reckless discharge of a firearm too, since that bullet will be coming down in a random location within that city or suburb. Prohibiting shooting at airborne objects like airplanes and drones is common too.

The Grandpa could have declined to have a conversation where he incriminated himself without actually lying.

This is an interesting variation of a common fear of cameras in public, as seen with 1st amendment auditors.

[ - ] ICantBeArsed 1 point 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 01:37:13 ago (+2/-1)

He didnt hit it, so 9mm rounds can go flying and kill people in the distance. You don't shoot at what you can't hit.

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:11:13 ago (+2/-1)*

I would have gave the guy a warning and made him pay for the drone.

But, ya know, jews.

[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:58:59 ago (+2/-1)

Most likely,a local ordinance prohibiting the "discharge" of a firearm in city limits??

[ - ] Looneyskiproony 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 20:45:07 ago (+1/-1)

I'm all for what he did, however shooting straight up is a big no no.

[ - ] Belrial 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:53:55 ago (+1/-1)

No he did not carry himself with dignity or honor. The ignorant jackass thought he owned the airspace over his house, and no he doesn't. He then demonstrated said ignorance of that and his right to STFU by talking to Officer Schmedly there.

What was illegal is shooting at a drone.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-2-aircraft-sabotage-18-usc-32
There's the law that says you can't shoot aircraft, and yes drones are registered as aircraft.

[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:51:17 ago (+1/-1)

Boomers are stupid as a rule.
Dumb fuck gives a full confession, tries repeatedly to wave his rights, makes jokes that the prosecution could try to turn into an issue of mindset, the whole time oblivious to the gravity of the situation he put himself in.
This isn't fucking Mayberry, this is the dystopian hellscape their stupidity created in it's place.
Never talk to the police.
Never offer information.
Never offer clarification.
Never rebutt.
Shut the fuck up.
Embrace the theater of rights you still believe you possess.
And...
Never fucking talk to police.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:00:42 ago (+0/-0)

this is the dystopian hellscape their stupidity created in it's place.

Exfuckingzactly.

[ - ] Anotherone 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 17:41:25 ago (+2/-2)

He doesn't own the airspace, he discharged a firearm, and you can go shooting shit out of the sky.

He will end up buying Walmart a new drone or likely take the charge as a felony.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 17:46:18 ago (+0/-1)

hahaha, that's not a felony.

[ - ] Belrial 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:52:10 ago (+1/-1)

Yes it is. Maybe you might want to bone up on the law or STFU.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-2-aircraft-sabotage-18-usc-32

There's the relevant law dipshit. And before you try to claim the drone doesn't count as an aircraft they're registered with the FAA as aircraft.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:02:42 ago (+0/-1)

That doesn't list a felony classification.
Looking it up, it appears to be classified as E, 5 years or less and/or a fine.

It uses the phrase "shall be", which does not mean, 'must be', but rather, 'may be'.

Indicating once again that this is a commercial statue.

Further, if there is no harmed party there is no crime.

[ - ] TheNoticing 2 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 08:39:47 ago (+2/-0)

I understand "shall be" as "must be." You mean to tell me that jews use their word magick on something that should be that simple?

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:26:10 ago (+0/-1)

@Love240 got his Juris Doctor from a strip mall college. He's untrainable.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:27:48 ago (+0/-1)

Fuck off faggot.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:30:48 ago (+0/-1)

Haha... aren't you the one claiming to be the next best Christian after St. Paul? What would Jesus think?

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:27:08 ago (+0/-1)

Yes, it is not that simple. The kikes have fucky definitions for a lot of this shit.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:07:08 ago (+0/-1)

Wrong answer. 5 years is definitely a felony. Go back to law school idiot. Also you don't need to do damage to get hit with sabotage. Just point your laser at an aircraft and you're in a heap of shit.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:08:50 ago (+0/-1)

It's a fine OR 5 years, that's commercial.

Never going to law school, faggot.

That's why if you're gonna shoot it, make sure you get it.

[ - ] Anotherone 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:04:03 ago (+1/-1)

And epstine killed himself too huh?

It is whatever they say it is at this point.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 19:05:13 ago (+0/-1)

Completely irrelevant.

[ - ] Anotherone 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 22:22:38 ago (+1/-0)

I enjoy how you belive that someone can knock a registered drone that belongs to a billion dollar corp out the sky by shooting it, and they cannot leverage a felony.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:24:32 ago (+0/-1)

@Love240 has proven himself a retarded nigger faggot on more than one occasion. There's no point arguing with that dumb shit.

[ - ] Love240 0 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:25:40 ago (+1/-1)

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:28:17 ago (+0/-1)

Oh look, my leg is being humped. Dance for me Love.

[ - ] Love240 -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:28:39 ago (+0/-1)

I don't dance, queer.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 11, 2024 20:31:28 ago (+0/-1)

Oh yes you do. Keep dancing for me.

[ - ] Love240 0 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:19:54 ago (+1/-1)

[ - ] Dingo [op] 1 point 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:23:00 ago (+1/-0)

I totally agree that he should have shut the fuck up.

That said, doesn't the 2nd and 4th amendment protect him from prosecution?

[ - ] Love240 2 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 14:26:59 ago (+3/-1)

No, because he consented to be questioned and arrested for commercial infractions (AKA by-laws).

He's probably being charged with discharging a 'firearm' within city limits (revised statue, again, a by-law and commercial infraction) or potentially disturbing the peace.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:56:08 ago (+0/-1)

No, he's looking at a pretty serious Federal felony.

[ - ] Belrial -1 points 6 monthsDec 10, 2024 18:58:16 ago (+0/-1)