Most White guys WILL ask. They just won't ask you. We will ask our friends, your friends, and possibly others if you are a fucking soiled mud-shark that now has a ~51% chance of having the Herp.
If you are out fucking people "Who just want to get laid", then you aren't worth our time. You are a free-to-ride turn-style.
Most White guys WILL ask. They just won't ask you.
Thats why I say this is fake and gay.
If you are out fucking people "Who just want to get laid", then you aren't worth our time.
Don’t get mad at me. I never pursued meaningless sex. Im just being honest about the motives of the average (white) guy. I think you guys should be honest about who you are willing to fuck. You guys always complain about how so many white women want to “ride the cock-go-round” and you never want to discuss who the cock-go-round actually is. Its overwhelmingly white men.
Ive said this probably dozens of times on here. If white men don’t want to swim in crap they should stop shitting in the pool. I don’t see any signs of that happening. Whens that post gonna be made? Zero accountability in this MGTOW circle jerk — you tell each other what you want to hear. You downvote me for telling unpalatable truths.
It's a double standard. The reason for that double standard is gender roles. The reason for gender roles is biology. Women are supposed to choose their partners very carefully as they are burdened with child and have to care for it. Men are meant to be providers but their biological role is to fuck as many women as possible.
Don't be mad at men, be mad at nature. Women for the most part got the short end of the stick but they are supposed to counter act that by being selective. A woman that sleeps with a nig nog is the opposite of that. She has proven she doesn't have sense and should be avoided.
Dude, she is a raging misandrist. It's not even funny anymore, it was at first, "Look, our post-wall female user hates men, lol"
But now she's replying to comments that have nothing to do with men/women with shit like "YEAH BUT IF MEN DIDN'T DO THAT THEN EVERYTHING WOULD BE PERFECT, FUCKING DIE PIG MAN!!" She's clearly not okay.
No. Im just one single person pushing back on on a steady stream of lies told about White women on this site. This is outrageous to you and amounts to misandry. Lol.
You are not being honest about the extremely biased misogynist viewpoints that dominate this site. It is nowhere near a fair fight between me and 100 guys that give “their side” a pass on degeneracy (every single time) while perpetrating fallacies to demonize and humiliate members of their own race.
I don’t need a fair fight. But I require honestly and I don’t respect pettiness and jewy tricks. When are you White men going to live up to this ideal you supposedly invented, of honest debate?
"YEAH BUT IF MENWAHMEN DIDN'T DO THAT THEN EVERYTHING WOULD BE PERFECT, FUCKING DIE PIG MANWAHMEN!!"
That doesn’t look like about a dozen posts here in the last week? ^
Lots of dudes here like myself who have been (a) happily married for many years and (b) have great relationships with their daughters.
I don't like the hate that white women get on this site ... Fuck the losers. But, to be fair, I also doesn't really understand it. I've never had to date post "modern day dating" and I feel for anyone (male or female) who does. It's a mess and it won't end well for anyone...
They're not my posts, but you speak to me as if they are. That's why I know you're a misandrist; you immediately judge me as someone who hates women or won't acknowledge shitty double standards. You're no better than a feminist retard saying "Yes, all men are rapists". Fuck, you're WORSE, because you should be smart enough to know better from hanging around here. You don't get ignorance as an excuse.
If I posted my tits, half of you would attack me for being a whore and the other half would call me a tranny and demand I post pics of my “gash” to prove otherwise. Theres really no winning with you guys. Most of you despise women and you like to abuse us. I didn’t think that was true a few years ago but I do now. Congratulations.
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 13:07:36 ago (+1/-0)
It's less of us than you think, but it's true the risk with women in current year is way too high. I'm saying that after 20-some years of being divorced, so take it with a grain of salt.
The risk is real for women too. Ive been treated like shit. But I don’t use it as an excuse to abuse men. I know you are not abusive to women. But what Im talking about here is real. And its not a few bad apples. Its a campaign to make me shut up and stop questioning their “wAhMeN R eBiL” narrative. Sexual humiliation is one of their favorite tactics.
[ - ] anrach 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 07:59:33 ago (+2/-1)
I appreciate your posts, Helena. You're usually even-keel and realistic about things.
I agree that there's too much WW bashing around here, when we of all people should appreciate that women have been lied to and inculcated with poison since birth—just like us men. On the other hand, shame culture can be a very pragmatic way of fighting that programming... Even if it's 'unfair' in some cosmic sense.
Another thing to consider here is that is unlikely to be the 'average' White man running through women so much as the top 20% or so, which has as much to do with women's hypergamous instincts as it does those men's lack of restraint. My understanding is that an average woman's bodycount these days dwarfs that of the average man.
I appreciate that you appreciate my attempts to be fair and even keeled. Even tho I don’t always succeed.
On the other hand, shame culture can be a very pragmatic way of fighting that programming... Even if it's 'unfair' in some cosmic sense.
If 20% of White men are “running through” White women, why is there no shame being applied there? Theres many users on this site that have admitted to being promiscuous but none of them are shamed for it. Many of them are older and regret their youthful indiscretions. How is this different then what some women do? Is there no penalty for men? I just saw an anon post the other day that he blew his paycheck on a hooker. I didn’t see anybody shaming him. I didn’t shame him because I don’t think its useful. But a lot of you guys who praise the usefulness of shaming seem to give their fellow males a pass.
How is this rational? If the problem is “used up” females who are unacceptable for marriage, the problem can be solved with ZERO female cooperation. White males would simply agree to only having sex with one woman and males who had more would be shamed by other males. If you believe in shaming, is that not pragmatic?
Why don’t men hold this 20% accountable? Is it because because most white men want to be in that 20% if they get a chance?
My understanding is that an average woman's bodycount these days dwarfs that of the average man.
How is this mathematically possible? I mean think about it. You would have to believe that WW are 90% fucking niggers and WM aren’t at all. This is unbelieveable. If 20% of WM are doing 5x more women than the bottom 80%of men the average is still the same as if they all only had the same number of women. Plus you don’t account for the fact that maybe half of all WM have fucked the same 3% of WW ie.— professional hookers. Maybe you want to argue that the median body count of women is higher than the median body count of men but I think both distributions are going to be bi-modal and I wouldn’t make any assumptions about that. I think you have this belief because you are not looking objectively (mathematically) about the problem and your understanding is based on MGTOW memes, not data.
Well no one succeeds all the time, but plenty of people don't even try...
why is there no shame being applied there?
There is, in the more wholesome WN circles (which this forum is certainly not restricted to). Of course there are many other complications here... Having sex is very much linked to proving one's masculinity and that's quite a primal thing. It's also part of a man's status... A promiscuous man tends to be more attractive to women for various reasons.
Mainly though, it's because women control access to sex in the modern West and so it's vastly more important that they exercise the restraint. They could also choose not to grant access to promiscuous men (but they won't).
Why don’t men hold this 20% accountable? Is it because because most white men want to be in that 20% if they get a chance?
Aside from the factors above... Honestly, yes. Most men—especially young ones—would require the disposition of a saint to turn down that opportunity. It's just what it is—how we're built. If we're generous and say that women have a similar intensity of drive (which I doubt, but won't claim to know for sure), then it again comes down to who controls access... Which is women.
White males would simply agree to only having sex with one woman and males who had more would be shamed by other males. If you believe in shaming, is that not pragmatic?
Frankly, no it isn't. Women are the 'gatekeepers'... The efforts should be focused there. The only way your suggestion would really make sense is if we revived a more patriarchal kind of society, but if that were to happen I think you'd find most of this would no longer be an issue very quickly. That said, I don't think it's a bad idea for men to frown upon male promiscuity, I just think that focusing on women has a lot more return-on-investment potential.
WW are not 90% fucking niggers; despite the propaganda, WW very much prefer WM. (If you meant WW being 'niggers' in terms of behaviour, it again comes down to access control. The average guys would be as bad or worse if they really had a choice in the matter).
I'm not going claim any certainty with the math, because I'm very much out of touch with dating scenes. What I'm hearing though, is that among younger generations 'average status' guys are either not having sex or barely any, while most 'average looking' women have had multiple partners by their early twenties. Also just hearsay, but all of the White fellas I know IRL would rather go without than stoop to paying a hooker. So nothing definitive here, but I will say that this lopsided activity does make sense in the context of women controlling access + having hypergamous drives (which is not propaganda, but fact).
I wrote this long response and the upgoat logged me out when I tried to post it.
Let me try again but this one will be a bit briefer.
Having sex is very much linked to proving one's masculinity and that's quite a primal thing. It's also part of a man's status...
Of course this is all true of women as well. Why doesn’t that occur to you
A promiscuous man tends to be more attractive to women for various reasons.
No. He doesn’t. Im sure there are some women who like the idea of being with a promiscuous guy, just like there are some men who like being with promiscuous women. But most women find promiscuous men disgusting. I suspect you are confusing what women like with what men admire and aspire to.
Frankly, no it isn't. Women are the 'gatekeepers'... The efforts should be focused there.
“Women should be the gatekeepers because women are the gatekeepers” — thats what Im hearing and its a circular argument. Monogamy is a pact between men. Without that male pact you have polygyny and every polygynous society is a shithole because of polygyny. Polygyny is the ultimate patriarchy and its still a shithole because it is the cause of hypergamy. Your 20/80 hypergamy problem is worse in a true patriarchal polygynous society because the factors that cause hypergamy are increased.
When males don’t set limits on how many females any individual male can hoard, economically exploitive tactics become incentivized and trust between males is destroyed. You have huge wealth disparity. Women don’t have any sexual agency in such a society. They are just property being bartered by males. Women are not to blame for the middle east. Men are. When goats say “Islam is right about women” they think that they can take polygyny and subjugation of women a la carte and avoid the general shittiness that is always a fall out of polygyny. But they can’t.
I actually did a lot of reasearch on monogamy and “patriarchal” polygyny and “matriarchal” polygamy. They are influenced by economic factors which incentivize behavioral traits which are determined by genetics. Women need to get their act together and stop acting like a bunch of african sheboons. And white men need to stop giving themselves a pass to act like a pack of wild muslims.
It's just what it is—how we're built. If we're generous and say that women have a similar intensity of drive (which I doubt, but won't claim to know for sure), then it again comes down to who controls access... Which is women.
This is just a cop out. Men are promiscuous because theyre built that way and its natural. When women are promiscuous its totally different and morally unacceptable? You cant just say “ oh we’re functional niggers in this area, we can’t be accountable” and then say women are too emotional and irrational (or evil!) and can’t be trusted to participate in society. This is a deeply biased argument. Its totally hypocritical. Men can and have established monogamous regimes in which men are punished and ostracized. Those places turned out to be the best countries because they incentivized the most egalitarian behaviors, favoring “provider” monogamists, rather than warlords with harems. Its in mens interests to maintain monogamy. Failure to do so results in the very economic conditions we are seeing now. The heart of the problem is male intrasexual competition ruck amok. Monogamy minimizes it. Women are not causing it.
I'm not going claim any certainty with the math,
If you understand that there are two sets, men and women, and that everytime there is a sexual event, the collective body count of both the male and female sets goes up one, it really doesn’t matter what you are hearing about the sexual degeneracy of one of these sets vs. the other. Because they are fucking each other! Its just very basic math.
If the bottom 50% of males are getting no sex (zero body count) and the top 50% of males are having sex with 100% of females, it just means there is a more variable outcome among males. The top 50% of males are 2x as slutty as the females. So why then are males the virtuous group in this scenario? Incel apologists only point to the bottom 50% of males and claim males are innocent victims and women are horny psychopaths. Surely that is a mischaracterization!
but all of the White fellas I know IRL would rather go without than stoop to paying a hooker.
Theres a lot of hookers out there. They aren’t making all their $$ off of niggers. Theres a couple strip clubs near me. The guys that go there are not niggers. We should have a poll if you really want to find out.
Well maybe your movement would have more credilbility if you were honest and didn’t resort to jewy tactics like these fake memes. It reflects badly on your whole sex.
He didn’t ask the question. He just insinuated that I had to discredit me.
I have certainly never touched a nigger dick. I have touched a very small number of dicks and they were all white.
How many more times do I have to answer this question, which is btw irrelevant to whether or not Im right?
Funny how you never ask each other these sort of questions. Huh. Its like you lack accountability. Should I draw any conclusions about the male character from that? I mean sure, its anecdotal but when did that ever stop you guys?
Youre not objective. You’re not logical. You tell each other what you want to hear. If anyone questions your assertions you try to sexually humiliate them as you did here.
Your anti-female posts are cherrypicked or entirely fabricated as this probably is. This daily diet of hate amounts to a propaganda campaign just like jews do to whites. Its not based on data. But jew away. Try to make it about me, thats fine. I am lily-fuckin-white compared to the average guy around here.
I don’t think I’ve made any anti-women posts or comments. I am glad to hear that you’ve never been defiled. Going forward, would you mind capitalizing White please? I never asked if any of the dudes touched nigger dick, because I assumed that answer was a no one both fronts.
Things shifted in the youth over the last ten years. When I was wife shopping, overall body count was a negative to me, didn't matter with who. And yes, at that point I had kept my dick in my pants.
Ive asked everyone ive been with that question. Im sure a bunch of guys would still fuck, but as far as anything beyond that that number is close to zero as far as real men. I wouldn’t touch a girl that ever has been with one. Been married almost twenty years now but before then.
I don't know man. I've seen this happen to a couple girls in my area years ago. And they denied it, but the accusations kept them single. One even moved to our town to escape that stigma in her previous town, but thankfully word got around to us.
Imagine those miserable guys that end up marrying a girl with a mixed child. The things they must tell themselves to try and rationalize that existence. I would prefer death.
The chances of contracting a venereal disease are through the roof if you don't avoid coal burners.
The CDC used to have a Fact Page that showed nearly half of the people with an STD(AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes etc etc) were niggers. They've since scrubbed it.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -9 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:37:21 ago (+1/-10)
Most guys never ask . Ive never had anyone ask me if I dated a nigger. Most white guys just want to get laid.
[ + ] KosherHiveKicker
[ - ] KosherHiveKicker 13 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:11:17 ago (+13/-0)*
If you are out fucking people "Who just want to get laid", then you aren't worth our time. You are a free-to-ride turn-style.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:36:02 ago (+4/-5)
Thats why I say this is fake and gay.
Don’t get mad at me. I never pursued meaningless sex. Im just being honest about the motives of the average (white) guy. I think you guys should be honest about who you are willing to fuck. You guys always complain about how so many white women want to “ride the cock-go-round” and you never want to discuss who the cock-go-round actually is. Its overwhelmingly white men.
Ive said this probably dozens of times on here. If white men don’t want to swim in crap they should stop shitting in the pool. I don’t see any signs of that happening. Whens that post gonna be made? Zero accountability in this MGTOW circle jerk — you tell each other what you want to hear. You downvote me for telling unpalatable truths.
[ + ] hylo
[ - ] hylo 6 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:33:53 ago (+6/-0)
Don't be mad at men, be mad at nature. Women for the most part got the short end of the stick but they are supposed to counter act that by being selective. A woman that sleeps with a nig nog is the opposite of that. She has proven she doesn't have sense and should be avoided.
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 6 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:52:38 ago (+6/-0)
Dude, she is a raging misandrist. It's not even funny anymore, it was at first, "Look, our post-wall female user hates men, lol"
But now she's replying to comments that have nothing to do with men/women with shit like "YEAH BUT IF MEN DIDN'T DO THAT THEN EVERYTHING WOULD BE PERFECT, FUCKING DIE PIG MAN!!" She's clearly not okay.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 15:17:35 ago (+3/-3)*
No. Im just one single person pushing back on on a steady stream of lies told about White women on this site. This is outrageous to you and amounts to misandry. Lol.
You are not being honest about the extremely biased misogynist viewpoints that dominate this site. It is nowhere near a fair fight between me and 100 guys that give “their side” a pass on degeneracy (every single time) while perpetrating fallacies to demonize and humiliate members of their own race.
I don’t need a fair fight. But I require honestly and I don’t respect pettiness and jewy tricks. When are you White men going to live up to this ideal you supposedly invented, of honest debate?
MENWAHMEN DIDN'T DO THAT THEN EVERYTHING WOULD BE PERFECT, FUCKING DIE PIGMANWAHMEN!!"That doesn’t look like about a dozen posts here in the last week? ^
Oh but thats different, right. 🤡
[ + ] stillmostlyfriendly
[ - ] stillmostlyfriendly 3 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 15:30:48 ago (+4/-1)
Lots of dudes here like myself who have been (a) happily married for many years and (b) have great relationships with their daughters.
I don't like the hate that white women get on this site ... Fuck the losers. But, to be fair, I also doesn't really understand it. I've never had to date post "modern day dating" and I feel for anyone (male or female) who does. It's a mess and it won't end well for anyone...
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 1 point 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 16:18:14 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] stillmostlyfriendly
[ - ] stillmostlyfriendly 5 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:29:17 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:17:41 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 15:39:10 ago (+2/-0)
Like I had said before, I think you stared too long into the 'abyss', because it took up residence and now I see it staring back out of you.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:20:29 ago (+2/-2)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:47:25 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 3 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 21:18:03 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:12:07 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] SirNiggsalot
[ - ] SirNiggsalot 1 point 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 15:58:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 11:30:27 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 13:07:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 15:22:18 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] anrach
[ - ] anrach 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 07:59:33 ago (+2/-1)
I agree that there's too much WW bashing around here, when we of all people should appreciate that women have been lied to and inculcated with poison since birth—just like us men. On the other hand, shame culture can be a very pragmatic way of fighting that programming... Even if it's 'unfair' in some cosmic sense.
Another thing to consider here is that is unlikely to be the 'average' White man running through women so much as the top 20% or so, which has as much to do with women's hypergamous instincts as it does those men's lack of restraint. My understanding is that an average woman's bodycount these days dwarfs that of the average man.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 15:04:23 ago (+0/-1)
If 20% of White men are “running through” White women, why is there no shame being applied there? Theres many users on this site that have admitted to being promiscuous but none of them are shamed for it. Many of them are older and regret their youthful indiscretions. How is this different then what some women do? Is there no penalty for men? I just saw an anon post the other day that he blew his paycheck on a hooker. I didn’t see anybody shaming him. I didn’t shame him because I don’t think its useful. But a lot of you guys who praise the usefulness of shaming seem to give their fellow males a pass.
How is this rational? If the problem is “used up” females who are unacceptable for marriage, the problem can be solved with ZERO female cooperation. White males would simply agree to only having sex with one woman and males who had more would be shamed by other males. If you believe in shaming, is that not pragmatic?
Why don’t men hold this 20% accountable? Is it because because most white men want to be in that 20% if they get a chance?
How is this mathematically possible? I mean think about it. You would have to believe that WW are 90% fucking niggers and WM aren’t at all. This is unbelieveable. If 20% of WM are doing 5x more women than the bottom 80%of men the average is still the same as if they all only had the same number of women. Plus you don’t account for the fact that maybe half of all WM have fucked the same 3% of WW ie.— professional hookers. Maybe you want to argue that the median body count of women is higher than the median body count of men but I think both distributions are going to be bi-modal and I wouldn’t make any assumptions about that. I think you have this belief because you are not looking objectively (mathematically) about the problem and your understanding is based on MGTOW memes, not data.
[ + ] anrach
[ - ] anrach 2 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 16:42:36 ago (+2/-0)*
There is, in the more wholesome WN circles (which this forum is certainly not restricted to). Of course there are many other complications here... Having sex is very much linked to proving one's masculinity and that's quite a primal thing. It's also part of a man's status... A promiscuous man tends to be more attractive to women for various reasons.
Mainly though, it's because women control access to sex in the modern West and so it's vastly more important that they exercise the restraint. They could also choose not to grant access to promiscuous men (but they won't).
Aside from the factors above... Honestly, yes. Most men—especially young ones—would require the disposition of a saint to turn down that opportunity. It's just what it is—how we're built. If we're generous and say that women have a similar intensity of drive (which I doubt, but won't claim to know for sure), then it again comes down to who controls access... Which is women.
Frankly, no it isn't. Women are the 'gatekeepers'... The efforts should be focused there. The only way your suggestion would really make sense is if we revived a more patriarchal kind of society, but if that were to happen I think you'd find most of this would no longer be an issue very quickly. That said, I don't think it's a bad idea for men to frown upon male promiscuity, I just think that focusing on women has a lot more return-on-investment potential.
WW are not 90% fucking niggers; despite the propaganda, WW very much prefer WM. (If you meant WW being 'niggers' in terms of behaviour, it again comes down to access control. The average guys would be as bad or worse if they really had a choice in the matter).
I'm not going claim any certainty with the math, because I'm very much out of touch with dating scenes. What I'm hearing though, is that among younger generations 'average status' guys are either not having sex or barely any, while most 'average looking' women have had multiple partners by their early twenties. Also just hearsay, but all of the White fellas I know IRL would rather go without than stoop to paying a hooker. So nothing definitive here, but I will say that this lopsided activity does make sense in the context of women controlling access + having hypergamous drives (which is not propaganda, but fact).
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 22:08:44 ago (+0/-1)
Let me try again but this one will be a bit briefer.
Of course this is all true of women as well. Why doesn’t that occur to you
No. He doesn’t. Im sure there are some women who like the idea of being with a promiscuous guy, just like there are some men who like being with promiscuous women. But most women find promiscuous men disgusting. I suspect you are confusing what women like with what men admire and aspire to.
“Women should be the gatekeepers because women are the gatekeepers” — thats what Im hearing and its a circular argument. Monogamy is a pact between men. Without that male pact you have polygyny and every polygynous society is a shithole because of polygyny. Polygyny is the ultimate patriarchy and its still a shithole because it is the cause of hypergamy. Your 20/80 hypergamy problem is worse in a true patriarchal polygynous society because the factors that cause hypergamy are increased.
When males don’t set limits on how many females any individual male can hoard, economically exploitive tactics become incentivized and trust between males is destroyed. You have huge wealth disparity. Women don’t have any sexual agency in such a society. They are just property being bartered by males. Women are not to blame for the middle east. Men are. When goats say “Islam is right about women” they think that they can take polygyny and subjugation of women a la carte and avoid the general shittiness that is always a fall out of polygyny. But they can’t.
I actually did a lot of reasearch on monogamy and “patriarchal” polygyny and “matriarchal” polygamy. They are influenced by economic factors which incentivize behavioral traits which are determined by genetics. Women need to get their act together and stop acting like a bunch of african sheboons. And white men need to stop giving themselves a pass to act like a pack of wild muslims.
This is just a cop out. Men are promiscuous because theyre built that way and its natural. When women are promiscuous its totally different and morally unacceptable? You cant just say “ oh we’re functional niggers in this area, we can’t be accountable” and then say women are too emotional and irrational (or evil!) and can’t be trusted to participate in society. This is a deeply biased argument. Its totally hypocritical. Men can and have established monogamous regimes in which men are punished and ostracized. Those places turned out to be the best countries because they incentivized the most egalitarian behaviors, favoring “provider” monogamists, rather than warlords with harems. Its in mens interests to maintain monogamy. Failure to do so results in the very economic conditions we are seeing now. The heart of the problem is male intrasexual competition ruck amok. Monogamy minimizes it. Women are not causing it.
If you understand that there are two sets, men and women, and that everytime there is a sexual event, the collective body count of both the male and female sets goes up one, it really doesn’t matter what you are hearing about the sexual degeneracy of one of these sets vs. the other. Because they are fucking each other! Its just very basic math.
If the bottom 50% of males are getting no sex (zero body count) and the top 50% of males are having sex with 100% of females, it just means there is a more variable outcome among males. The top 50% of males are 2x as slutty as the females. So why then are males the virtuous group in this scenario? Incel apologists only point to the bottom 50% of males and claim males are innocent victims and women are horny psychopaths. Surely that is a mischaracterization!
Theres a lot of hookers out there. They aren’t making all their $$ off of niggers. Theres a couple strip clubs near me. The guys that go there are not niggers. We should have a poll if you really want to find out.
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:09:12 ago (+2/-0)
biological role is to fuck as many women as possible.
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 5 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:47:04 ago (+5/-0)
Helena: BuT mUh MiG-tOeS!!
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -3 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:58:03 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 4 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 15:25:08 ago (+4/-0)
If a coal-burning story has you this salty and angry at men....kinda makes me wonder how many niggers you've fucked...
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 17:14:02 ago (+1/-2)
Yeah, you are just covering yourself in glory pal. Try refuting my actual arguments instead of perpetrating bulverisms
[ + ] White_Pride_Cis
[ - ] White_Pride_Cis 2 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 06:51:39 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 15:50:04 ago (+1/-1)
I have certainly never touched a nigger dick. I have touched a very small number of dicks and they were all white.
How many more times do I have to answer this question, which is btw irrelevant to whether or not Im right?
Funny how you never ask each other these sort of questions. Huh. Its like you lack accountability. Should I draw any conclusions about the male character from that? I mean sure, its anecdotal but when did that ever stop you guys?
Youre not objective. You’re not logical. You tell each other what you want to hear. If anyone questions your assertions you try to sexually humiliate them as you did here.
Your anti-female posts are cherrypicked or entirely fabricated as this probably is. This daily diet of hate amounts to a propaganda campaign just like jews do to whites. Its not based on data. But jew away. Try to make it about me, thats fine. I am lily-fuckin-white compared to the average guy around here.
[ + ] White_Pride_Cis
[ - ] White_Pride_Cis 1 point 4 monthsDec 24, 2024 07:57:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 16:21:49 ago (+2/-0)
Seems to me the majority are socially challenged or have done nothing but find "dumb" people.
The biggest part is finding someone who will put up with your bullshit as well as you're willing to put up with theirs.
Most MTGOWs just focus on fornication.
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 4 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:26:49 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:23:18 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] White_Pride_Cis
[ - ] White_Pride_Cis 2 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 06:50:41 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheNoticing
[ - ] TheNoticing 2 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 12:18:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 12:24:21 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] 2Drunk
[ - ] 2Drunk 1 point 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:13:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GreatSatan
[ - ] GreatSatan -2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 18:24:42 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 21:26:13 ago (+1/-0)
They’re just a “hate white men reflex” exercise.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 15:24:19 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 22:30:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 22:35:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 4 monthsDec 23, 2024 20:50:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Indoctrinated_USA
[ - ] Indoctrinated_USA 3 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 23:33:44 ago (+3/-0)
I'm glad this is starting to happen.
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 6 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:44:57 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] Special_Prosecutor
[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 7 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 15:01:42 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] DoughGoy
[ - ] DoughGoy 8 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 18:12:43 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] Shitcreek
[ - ] Shitcreek 10 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:21:58 ago (+10/-0)
Drill for oil, pay the spoils.
[ + ] KyleIsThisTall
[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 12 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:28:01 ago (+12/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 19 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:08:06 ago (+19/-0)
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 21 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:23:13 ago (+21/-0)
[ + ] Shitcreek
[ - ] Shitcreek 8 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:33:22 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] JudyStroyer
[ - ] JudyStroyer 7 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:19:43 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] bobdole9
[ - ] bobdole9 6 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 13:22:47 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 5 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 16:26:32 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] DoughGoy
[ - ] DoughGoy 5 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 18:09:54 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 24 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:01:02 ago (+24/-0)
The CDC used to have a Fact Page that showed nearly half of the people with an STD(AIDS, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes etc etc) were niggers. They've since scrubbed it.
I like my dick without bumps, rashes or pustules.
[ + ] Freespeechplease
[ - ] Freespeechplease 14 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 14:25:28 ago (+14/-0)
[ + ] NuckFiggers
[ - ] NuckFiggers 4 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 18:42:20 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 2 points 4 monthsDec 22, 2024 12:05:35 ago (+6/-4)