Reality separates; few within suggest many to artificially integrate aka mix, which when consented to...permits few to shape and exploit fiction before reality pushes through.
A jew is fully aware about the disintegration which follows gentile consent to multiculturalism. It's about riding (choice) the pendulum swing (balance) when the integration gets destroyed (imbalance) yet again.
We did not keep it. Hard to say where exactly it went wrong, but I'd look to the days of Lincoln. Then again, letting the South go would've likely cascaded into an entire dissolution of the Union to look something more like pre-EU Europe. Not that I'm certain that would even be a bad outcome.
But many of the problems today stem from legislation that was passed then (and later, up to and through the Civil Rights movement) all in an attempt to assimilate niggers into civilization. Still trying to jam that square peg into the round hole.
Freedom implies natural dominance (perceivable) freeing each being (perception) within from one another through separation...suggested association aka "join in company, combine intimately; unite with" contradicts that.
freedom guaranteed
A guaranty implies a given (suggested) and taken (consented) security offered as an artificial liberty to one another, while ignoring natural free-dom.
Taken a liberty from another, puts one at liberty to another, hence self imposed slavery.
Can associate with who you want or not want
Want vs not want implies a conflict of reason, within which both sides mutually destroy each other.
Few suggest reason to trick many to imbalance each other, while ignoring to be FREE (choice) within DOM (balance). Balance dominates choice, while giving each choice the free opportunity to imbalance each other.
There's no exception to this constitutional right.
Except those chosen few who're suggesting constitutional rights towards consenting many, which by mass consent are placed above suggested constitutions; rights; laws; liberties; commandments; orders etc.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 12:34:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 1 point 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 05:04:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] BoozyB
[ - ] BoozyB 7 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 08:25:07 ago (+7/-0)
The framers could never have anticipated the current multi culture.
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 1 point 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 22:06:39 ago (+1/-0)
Run with it.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 05:34:09 ago (+0/-1)
A jew is fully aware about the disintegration which follows gentile consent to multiculturalism. It's about riding (choice) the pendulum swing (balance) when the integration gets destroyed (imbalance) yet again.
[ + ] registereduser
[ - ] registereduser 1 point 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 10:09:05 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] BushChuck5002
[ - ] BushChuck5002 -1 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 11:33:56 ago (+2/-3)
It's just a piece of parchment.
[ + ] Sleazy
[ - ] Sleazy 3 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 12:26:41 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] InYourFaceNancyGrace
[ - ] InYourFaceNancyGrace 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 12:16:52 ago (+2/-0)*
We did not keep it. Hard to say where exactly it went wrong, but I'd look to the days of Lincoln. Then again, letting the South go would've likely cascaded into an entire dissolution of the Union to look something more like pre-EU Europe. Not that I'm certain that would even be a bad outcome.
But many of the problems today stem from legislation that was passed then (and later, up to and through the Civil Rights movement) all in an attempt to assimilate niggers into civilization. Still trying to jam that square peg into the round hole.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -1 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 05:26:58 ago (+0/-1)
Freedom implies natural dominance (perceivable) freeing each being (perception) within from one another through separation...suggested association aka "join in company, combine intimately; unite with" contradicts that.
A guaranty implies a given (suggested) and taken (consented) security offered as an artificial liberty to one another, while ignoring natural free-dom.
Taken a liberty from another, puts one at liberty to another, hence self imposed slavery.
Want vs not want implies a conflict of reason, within which both sides mutually destroy each other.
Few suggest reason to trick many to imbalance each other, while ignoring to be FREE (choice) within DOM (balance). Balance dominates choice, while giving each choice the free opportunity to imbalance each other.
Except those chosen few who're suggesting constitutional rights towards consenting many, which by mass consent are placed above suggested constitutions; rights; laws; liberties; commandments; orders etc.
[ + ] IsraelRespecter
[ - ] IsraelRespecter -3 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 10:17:05 ago (+0/-3)
deal with it crackers most of your kind have mixed with Black people anyways
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 12:27:41 ago (+2/-0)
That's where Cracker comes from, nigger.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 13:04:31 ago (+2/-0)