×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
16
14 comments block


[ - ] Wahaha 5 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 13:07:08 ago (+5/-0)

As far as I know Muslims had religious leaders with the attitude that the way things were was good enough, so they kinda blocked technological progress.

Europe's situation can be explained by the printing press. It made it very easy for information to be exchanged. Germany didn't have copyright until the 19th century, which helped tremendously for ideas to move around and be improved upon. Copyright crippled Europe's scientific advancments and made a few middlemen very rich.

The reason China has gotten as powerful as quickly is also because they ignored copyright.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 15:36:44 ago (+2/-0)

Regulation is the exact opposite of inventiveness.

[ - ] boekanier 1 point 2 monthsFeb 18, 2025 02:45:23 ago (+1/-0)*

the catholic church also blocked scientific progress (Galilei, Bruno...) during some 1,000 years. Science and religion are still (how could it be otherwise?) at odds with each other

[ - ] Eliack [op] 4 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 10:45:11 ago (+4/-0)

[ - ] carnold03 1 point 2 monthsFeb 11, 2025 12:43:44 ago (+1/-0)*

Simple. The Romans/Europeans weren't stupid enough to provoke the Mongols, especially Genghis Khan.

Old as he was, he sent men of war to Baghdad with explicit orders to make offers of peace and trade, even bringing valuables to sweeten the deal. Baghdad leadership responded by taking their stuff and sending back their heads thinking Genghis Khan was weak and old. This provoked him to remind the entire Arabian peninsula why he was called The Great Khan. He even had the Tangut people of western China completely 'erased' from all historical record for thinking he wasn't able to wreck them as well when he called on their emperor to fulfill his oath of fealty to providing soldiers for the effort to wipe out the Arabs.

Imagine the hundreds of millions, if not tens of billions, of people, men, women, and children, across Asia and Asia Minor that were were genocided all because of two complete @$$holes. The Mongols killed everyone, including the slaves. Anyone who managed to survive was doomed to a slow painful death due to starvation and disease, without food, and clean water. It would take decades to recover from that, assuming you had enough healthy survivors with the knowledge to help rebuild. To say nothing of the decades of internal unrest from raiders.

[ - ] _Obrez 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 21:35:05 ago (+2/-0)

Europe's success was enabled by technological advancements but that ignores the rest of the world receiving such technology and failing to live up to our success, we also see a decline in european heritage nations rate of growth and invention per capita after the great wars.

The truth is obviously genetic but then why were rome and greece and even the islamic world succeeding when europe was "backward?"

The feudal system. I'm not saying it was a perfect system but it had two key factors that led toward an incidental eugenic effect.

Men of any status could be promoted or demoted in the hierarchy based on achievement and contribution at most times in feudal europe.

Second, the survival rates of your children depending on your place in the hierarchy, and their likelihood to reproduce, this is why inside the white population height and intelligence are linked because a knighted man was likely to produce more surviving heirs who retained some claim to peerage, this is why most people of european descent can tie their bloodline back to a king or emperor, and ultimately the founder of such a dynasty like Charlemagne; these men were the pinnacles of human achievement in their time, their genes are tied to their success and their children and generations of their descendants being more likely to survive than the peasantry's children creates a mathematical inevitability that the population will begin to reflect a founding sovereign's best traits over hundreds of years.

It's idiocracy in reverse.

This is why I support soft eugenics; no use of force or coercion but only gentle incentives and disincentives.

Offer to pay criminals to remove themselves from the gene pool, a misdemeanor? we will not pay for your vasectomy, two? We will pay? Three or a felony? We will pay you, more crimes than this? We will pay you more but require you to never reverse it for any payouts over 10k.

The goal is mitigation here.

On the other end we offer IQ based subsidies for parents, like loan forgiveness programs and free pregnancy care but these are contingent on obedience to the law, no more than 1 misdemeanor per decade per parent.

The next soft eugenic layer is improving education standards so that genuinely stupid people fail school and end up getting snipped while people with high academic achievement, even without high IQ, receive grants that make them more likely to reproduce and more often, women like stability, that is why so many like a man in uniform, there is a pension and benefits program she and her children can rely on, making a series of pro-natalist grants for both men and women means women will be more attracted to men who hold natalist grants, having a government backed loan forgiveness program to your name should make getting a home loan or even a car loan much easier, 25% off the full loan per child and you can apply it to any personal or domestic loan at any time after the birth of the child. Use it to pay off your student loans, a mortgage, secure a mortgage on a large house with a 25% down payment, a boat, a limit should be set here to prevent billionaires from buying a yacht 25% off for having a kid. We need to set a cap based on expected per anum tax value of the average net positive taxpayer. For example the average white american represents about $250k in lifetime net contribution to the federal treasury so 20-30% of that in loan forgiveness isn't a big deal at all if we can get the net negative tax "contributors" below replacement levels and positive tax contributors above replacement. For contexts spics cost about 500k to the federal treasury over their lifetime, a net negative, and blacks cost a million or so, also net negative, these are averages mind you but outliers don't prove much here.

If all we achieve is a ten percent swing in either direction we will be set to see the same sort of level intellectual dominance we produced in the renaissance and enlightenment all over again and this time in a fraction of the time just a generation or two. Ten generations out, if these policies persisted, average IQ would be a 140-150 or possibly much higher.

Part of the nuance of this plan is that the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) is an IQ test meaning any high Intellectual Quotient service member will have a VA agent assisting them in the receipt of these funds better assuring the passage of genes capable of fighting wars and not just eggheads.

[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 16:11:10 ago (+2/-0)

Infighting caused by kikes seeking profits from Kingdoms who were ambitious and easily manipulated.

The Population was basically kept illiterate to keep them from progression and a maintained status quo.

This was all thrown into shambles with the Gutenberg Bible.

Not that it was just a Bible. But amongst Whites inspired drives to literacy.

Youll note these times as peak RCC Faggtory.

[ - ] Kozel 1 point 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 21:50:53 ago (+1/-0)

Its called westward migration

too bad we cant go west anymore

[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 16:53:37 ago (+0/-0)

See: "German Migration Period".
The second map is what happens a few generations after Germanic Super-DNA asserts itself in a new environment.

[ - ] Cantaloupe 0 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 15:35:19 ago (+0/-0)

In part Muslim civilization was set back by Khan.

The black plague had a big impact on Europe

[ - ] HelenHighwater 0 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 15:08:43 ago (+1/-1)

Faggot pig-fucking mohammed is what happened. He banned knowledge turned the clock back to the stone age.

[ - ] goatfugee12 0 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 13:57:43 ago (+0/-0)

this is meaningless without the qualifiers, methodology, and parameters.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 2 monthsFeb 10, 2025 13:00:38 ago (+0/-0)

Mud flood

[ - ] RafalGanowicz -1 points 2 monthsFeb 11, 2025 12:58:48 ago (+2/-3)

moslems