Doctors wouldn't prescribe ANYTHING for sick people during the "pandemic" hoax. They wouldn't even give cough medicine to people who had the flu or even covid itself.
I know why, too- it's because they wanted your symptoms to get so bad, you felt you needed to go to the hospital to finally get some kind of help. That's where they kill you. Nobody was dying at home in their beds from covid, homeless people weren't piling up dead in the streets- the deaths only happened after going to the hospital.
If doctors were actually treating their patients for the usual shit, the number of deaths during the pandemic would be way, way fewer.
A new analysis suggests that a high percentage of people who required help from a ventilator due to a COVID-19 infection also developed secondary bacterial pneumonia. This pneumonia was responsible for a higher mortality rate than the COVID-19 infection.
People with severe covid (from SARS COV 2) can get lungs that fill will phlegm as a result of the infection and then conditions are ripe for a bacterial pneumonia to set in. That doesn’t mean that SARS CoV 2 isn’t the ultimate cause of death.
The federal government paid mad scientists to design a dangerous virus that was far more lethal than the flu, especially in the elderly and obese. It killed millions. But a brilliant psyop on their part has convinced you that the virus never existed. You are their greatest defenders.
You mean Ivermectin and HCQ.. Antibiotics don't do much against a virus.
They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. Calling Ivermectin a horse dewormer with no medical benefit was their nail in the coffin. Or it should have been, in any world which has at least SOME accountability.. (not for ZOGs).
This is actually not true. Many antibiotics inhibit viral infections as well as bacterial ones. Ivermectin is one such drug which has been shown to be effective against MERSA in vitro. Tetracyclines like doxycycline have been used against viruses and so have macrolides like azithromycin. Both drugs were used against covid.
Some of these drugs may block cell entry of both viruses and bacteria. Others may inhibit transcription of the viral/bacterial genome which blocks reproduction. Im sure theres other mechanisms at work which I don’t know about. The point is, they always said there was nothing that could be prescribed for a viral flu or cold but that was a lie.
It feels unfair trying to compare ivermectin to a lot of stuff- simply because it's so absurdly effective at so many different things. It's not very common you find a drug that is so effective while having so little side effects.
That's why the medical industry doesn't want it to be easily available. They don't make money by curing people, they make money by turning people into lifelong patients (aka consumers) that are dependent on the medical industry. Why allow a cure for cancer to be available cheaply when you could be charging those same patients obscene amounts of money for cancer treatments that are not only ineffective, but extremely destructive.
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 4 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 06:56:09 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 11:15:30 ago (+0/-0)
I know why, too- it's because they wanted your symptoms to get so bad, you felt you needed to go to the hospital to finally get some kind of help. That's where they kill you. Nobody was dying at home in their beds from covid, homeless people weren't piling up dead in the streets- the deaths only happened after going to the hospital.
If doctors were actually treating their patients for the usual shit, the number of deaths during the pandemic would be way, way fewer.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 08:30:26 ago (+0/-0)
People with severe covid (from SARS COV 2) can get lungs that fill will phlegm as a result of the infection and then conditions are ripe for a bacterial pneumonia to set in. That doesn’t mean that SARS CoV 2 isn’t the ultimate cause of death.
The federal government paid mad scientists to design a dangerous virus that was far more lethal than the flu, especially in the elderly and obese. It killed millions. But a brilliant psyop on their part has convinced you that the virus never existed. You are their greatest defenders.
We’re totally winning tho. You guys are geniuses.
[ + ] RollinDaGrassTyson
[ - ] RollinDaGrassTyson 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 09:01:16 ago (+0/-0)
Surely, monuments will be erected in their memory, naming all the names of the millions who died.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 09:12:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] QuestionEverything
[ - ] QuestionEverything 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 08:21:04 ago (+0/-0)
They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. Calling Ivermectin a horse dewormer with no medical benefit was their nail in the coffin. Or it should have been, in any world which has at least SOME accountability.. (not for ZOGs).
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 1 monthMar 5, 2025 09:20:51 ago (+0/-0)
Some of these drugs may block cell entry of both viruses and bacteria. Others may inhibit transcription of the viral/bacterial genome which blocks reproduction. Im sure theres other mechanisms at work which I don’t know about. The point is, they always said there was nothing that could be prescribed for a viral flu or cold but that was a lie.
[ + ] BloodyComet
[ - ] BloodyComet 1 point 1 monthMar 5, 2025 11:18:22 ago (+1/-0)
That's why the medical industry doesn't want it to be easily available. They don't make money by curing people, they make money by turning people into lifelong patients (aka consumers) that are dependent on the medical industry. Why allow a cure for cancer to be available cheaply when you could be charging those same patients obscene amounts of money for cancer treatments that are not only ineffective, but extremely destructive.