Oh good, time for a rant on the subject of self-censorship for the sake of Youtube money.
I cannot stand people on YT self-censoring themselves with grammatically incorrect words because they're afraid of the YT jews. "Unalive" instead of suicide, "spicy time" instead of "have sex" and similiar trash. This is especially prevalent in the subscription begging anti-feminist / bachelor channels, where the "men" cannot complain about whores, sluts and communist without gingerly beating around the bush, hoping to avoid being "demonetized".
I'm probably alone in uploading things to the net just for the fun of things, not expecting to be paid immediately.
How do I finance my frivolous online nonsense? By a real job building shit. Being on the internet is just my hobby, as it should be for most people but unfortunately isn't.
Seeing the internet completely degrade from it's absolute high point of 1999 or 1998 was sad.
One of the ways cults control their members is through language. Scientology is a good example of this, where they forbid certain words, and change the meaning of others, all in an effort to control the people. The language manipulation of the last decade or so is just the “elite” using that tactic against the general population.
Dedication to crap that makes them money like Mr Beast and against anything that advertisers wouldn't like. It's not free speech, it it ever was. It's you giving them your data.
Let's be real here the narrative about advertisers clutching their pearls because of foul language or something is and always has been BS.
Ads are not an endorsement of the entertainers whose content is being highjacked to get publicity. Only the audience is of any interest to the companies. By definition the customers that hypothetically could be upset about seeing an ad and associating the product with the content creator when clicking on some disagreeable content are the ones that don't have a problem with that particular content in the first place.
OFC they have the technology to serve the ads to only church going users or whatever. This shit is 100 percent about self censorship.
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 12:39:08 ago (+1/-0)
The reason they can is the demoralizing part. People, for the most part, are just mammals that are easy to breed and exploit. That ranching practice is the basis of 'our' civilization.
Fuck YouTube. They made me fight with a cool youtuber, because I thought he was deleting my posts. Then I discovered it was a fucking YouTube bot using black list for words.
[ + ] JustALover
[ - ] JustALover 5 points 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 05:47:11 ago (+5/-0)
I cannot stand people on YT self-censoring themselves with grammatically incorrect words because they're afraid of the YT jews. "Unalive" instead of suicide, "spicy time" instead of "have sex" and similiar trash. This is especially prevalent in the subscription begging anti-feminist / bachelor channels, where the "men" cannot complain about whores, sluts and communist without gingerly beating around the bush, hoping to avoid being "demonetized".
I'm probably alone in uploading things to the net just for the fun of things, not expecting to be paid immediately.
How do I finance my frivolous online nonsense? By a real job building shit. Being on the internet is just my hobby, as it should be for most people but unfortunately isn't.
Seeing the internet completely degrade from it's absolute high point of 1999 or 1998 was sad.
[ + ] Stonkmar
[ - ] Stonkmar 5 points 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 04:06:28 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 2 points 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 09:06:32 ago (+2/-0)
The language manipulation of the last decade or so is just the “elite” using that tactic against the general population.
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 11:22:16 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 09:15:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] jerkofalltrades
[ - ] jerkofalltrades 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 11:52:28 ago (+1/-0)
Ads are not an endorsement of the entertainers whose content is being highjacked to get publicity. Only the audience is of any interest to the companies. By definition the customers that hypothetically could be upset about seeing an ad and associating the product with the content creator when clicking on some disagreeable content are the ones that don't have a problem with that particular content in the first place.
OFC they have the technology to serve the ads to only church going users or whatever. This shit is 100 percent about self censorship.
[ + ] RollinDaGrassTyson
[ - ] RollinDaGrassTyson 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 09:09:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Love240
[ - ] Love240 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 05:17:31 ago (+1/-0)
Because they can.
[ + ] Sector2
[ - ] Sector2 1 point 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 12:39:08 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TheSimulacra
[ - ] TheSimulacra 0 points 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 12:00:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist -1 points 2 monthsApr 10, 2025 04:22:50 ago (+2/-3)*