a) One was free before attempting to "make free". This inversion of thought, while denying self, implies applied freemasonry.
b) Being implies native (nati) within light (illumi)...hence having sight within the visible spectrum of light. The suggested label "illuminati" tempts those who consent to deny self, which once again implies applied freemasonry.
c) Making illegal tempts one to ignore being within natural law...others make artificial laws by tempting ones free will of choice to give consent, which once again implies applied freemasonry.
One cannot outlaw, while being within law. A jew distracts gentiles from being within law by suggesting laws applied from outside.
For example: "thou shall not kill" implies an artificial law, while having the free will of choice to kill implies natural law.
[ + ] JustALover
[ - ] JustALover 0 points 3 weeksMay 27, 2025 08:06:57 ago (+0/-0)
"Commit suicide by getting shot in the head twice before hanging yourself"?
Nah, I'll pass.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason 0 points 3 weeksMay 27, 2025 06:13:19 ago (+0/-0)
b) Being implies native (nati) within light (illumi)...hence having sight within the visible spectrum of light. The suggested label "illuminati" tempts those who consent to deny self, which once again implies applied freemasonry.
c) Making illegal tempts one to ignore being within natural law...others make artificial laws by tempting ones free will of choice to give consent, which once again implies applied freemasonry.
One cannot outlaw, while being within law. A jew distracts gentiles from being within law by suggesting laws applied from outside.
For example: "thou shall not kill" implies an artificial law, while having the free will of choice to kill implies natural law.
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist 0 points 3 weeksMay 27, 2025 04:12:35 ago (+1/-1)