×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0

Why Jews hate and denigrate Jesus Christ and Christianity

submitted by Conspirologist to Nationalism 10 hoursJun 6, 2025 11:52:07 ago (+4/-4)     (Nationalism)

Why Jews hate and denigrate Jesus Christ and Christianity

This is what Jews willing to brag explain, why they hate and denigrate Jesus Christ and Christianity.

Jews hypnotized a person historically named as Jesus Christ in order to obey their orders, fearless of consequences from his actions. In the end, he angered the Jewish king, who asked the Romans to crucify him.

Jews chose Jesus Christ to become the scapegoat, in order to become the holy image of Christianity, and die for the sins of the Jewish abusers.

Jews used Kabala hypnosis to hypnotize the unaware Jesus Christ. Also used their prostitute named Maria Magdalena to be his sex partner and handler, following their instructions.

All the Jewish 12 apostles were manipulating the 13th member Jesus Christ, expecting him to die as a scapegoat for their sins. This is why the number 13 is considered bad luck in modern Western society.

Also, The Jews claimed that all the Goys are sinful as the Jews, and are also responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. and must feel guilty. This made become most of Christians gullible preys.

After 2000 years, Jews still use Kabala hypnosis to enslave unaware children with pedophile abuse, or making them marry their prostitutes to control them when they become important leaders or celebrities.

Here below are definitions from Jewish religion to understand how Jews think and feel in order to control and subvert all non Jewish countries.

List of Definitions of Jewish Religious Masterplan

Chutzpah

Pronunciation: /ˈxʊt.spə/ or /ˈhʊt.spə/

Etymology: From Yiddish "khutspe," derived from Hebrew "ḥuṣpāh" (insolence, audacity).

Part of Speech: Noun

Definition:

Extreme self-confidence or audacity, often marked by a bold, unapologetic demeanor, especially in defiance of social norms or expectations.

A state of brazen, irrational persistence in one’s actions or beliefs, refusing to acknowledge fault, often projecting triumph over others seen as weaker or defeated.

Example: His chutzpah drove him to loudly defend his flawed plan, denying error, while casting critics as losers beneath his victorious stance.

Schmuck

Pronunciation: /ʃmʌk/

Etymology: From Yiddish "shmuck," likely a term for a fool or contemptible person, possibly linked to a vulgar term for male genitalia.

Part of Speech: Noun

Definition:

A foolish, contemptible, or detestable person, often oblivious to their own shortcomings.

An individual perceived as a loser or victim, unfairly diminished or ridiculed, while the aggressor, unapologetic, is elevated as dominant or successful.

Example: Labeled a schmuck, he endured blame and mockery, while the true culprit emerged the winner, fault unconfessed.

Scapegoat

Pronunciation: /ˈskeɪp.ɡoʊt/

Etymology: From English, coined in the 16th century by William Tyndale, combining "scape" (escape) and "goat," referencing the biblical Hebrew ritual (Leviticus 16).

Part of Speech: Noun

Definition:

A person or group unjustly blamed for wrongs, errors, or misfortunes caused by others.

An individual systematically assigned responsibility for faults, absorbing criticism in place of the true culprit, who avoids scrutiny and retains esteem.

Example: As the scapegoat, she bore the weight of the failure, while the negligent manager escaped, hailed as the victor.

Putz

Pronunciation: /pʌts/ or /pʊts/

Etymology: From Yiddish "פּאָץ" (pots), meaning "penis," a vulgar term; adopted into English and Russian slang (as "поц") for a fool or contemptible person.

Part of Speech: Noun

Definition:

A vulgar slang term for a foolish, obnoxious, or despicable person, often implying incompetence or worthlessness.

A person associated with handling cadaver genitalia, as in forensic or mortuary work, seen as a victim or inferior, unjustly blamed, while the unrepentant aggressor claims victory.

Example: The putz, working with cadaver genitalia in the morgue, was mocked as the failure, taking blame, while the instigator triumphed, fault ignored.

Golem

Pronunciation: /ˈɡoʊ.ləm/

Etymology: From Hebrew "gōlem" (גּוֹלֶם), meaning "shapeless mass," rooted in Jewish folklore and Kabbalistic texts.

Part of Speech: Noun

Definition:

In Jewish folklore, an anthropomorphic being created from inanimate matter, often clay, brought to life through mystical rituals to serve or protect.

A created being, driven by unthinking obedience, seen as a victim, unjustly blamed for chaos, while its creator, refusing fault, claims dominance.

Example: The golem, animated to guard, was branded the cause of destruction, taking the fall, while its reckless maker stood triumphant, error unacknowledged.

Lilith

Pronunciation: /ˈlɪl.ɪθ/

Etymology: From Hebrew "lîlît" (לִילִית), possibly from Sumerian or Akkadian night spirits, in Jewish texts like the Talmud and Kabbalah.

Part of Speech: Noun

Definition:

In Jewish folklore, a female demon or spirit, linked to night, seduction, and harm, often Adam’s rebellious first wife.

A seductive, supernatural female, irrationally pursuing aims without admitting wrong, dominating victims seen as defeated, casting them as scapegoats.

Example: Lilith, in her relentless allure, ensnared her prey, denying fault, while the broken victim bore blame, her victory unchallenged.


12 comments block


[ - ] Reunto 1 point 8 hoursJun 6, 2025 14:06:08 ago (+1/-0)

That's quite the theory. But then why would Talmudism oppose Christianity?

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] -1 points 8 hoursJun 6, 2025 14:12:32 ago (+0/-1)

What exactly don't you understand?

[ - ] Reunto 0 points 2 hoursJun 6, 2025 20:29:39 ago (+0/-0)

This is basically the theory you are presenting:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=23UNLLbOS3w

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 8 hoursJun 6, 2025 13:45:45 ago (+1/-0)

The idea that jews created jesus as some golem with apostles as his handlers is absurd.

Why do I have to repeat this over and over— jews are not playing 27D chess.

If any jews do say that “they” did this, it is a case of wishful thinking.

Originally jews and christians were the same people. The priests of the school that would become rabbinic judaism disagreed with jews who worshipped jesus and wanted to attack them philosophically and demonize them. This set up early christianity to be a bugbear of rabbinic jews. Of course they made up insulting stories about jesus which ended up in the talmud.

Christianity was not created by jews to control gentiles. Jews cannot see 2000 years into the future.

Anyway eventually Christianity became less jewish and it turns out the Judaism became less jewish too. Neither religion is worshipped by roman era hebrews of palestine.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 5 hoursJun 6, 2025 17:30:59 ago (+0/-0)

While you're more right than wrong you should still familiarize yourself with this stuff:

https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=683613cd79ed3

And the fact remains that any person you care to name here is more familiar with Daniel, David, and Ezekiel than Celtic goddesses.

[ - ] mahavishnunj -1 points 10 hoursJun 6, 2025 11:58:31 ago (+0/-1)

Not just Jews, I do that too. But again, can someone who never existed be denigrated?

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] -2 points 10 hoursJun 6, 2025 12:01:21 ago (+0/-2)

Highly likely Jesus existed. Obviously in the bible he become a useful idiot character.

[ - ] mahavishnunj 0 points 10 hoursJun 6, 2025 12:07:08 ago (+1/-1)

How is it highly likely? Nobody has been able to show me a single bit of even lame evidence. The earliest mention of a guy that maybe could've been a guy is over 200 years after this dude supposedly died. That's the "evidence".

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 9 hoursJun 6, 2025 13:28:29 ago (+1/-1)

Many people existed in Roman era palestine whom we have no record of. A lack of record does not mean they never existed.

Most legendary figures (and maybe some gods) are losely based on a real person or an amalgamation of people. There were probably hundreds of celebrated local prophets hanging around Judea at the time in question. Why make someone up from scratch when there are so many real people to chose from? Then as time goes on, people revise his life facts (family lineage, death date, virgin birth, etc) in order to make him seem more prophesied. I just think its unlikely he was made up from scratch, especially as OP says jews assert, as a tool or golem.

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] -1 points 10 hoursJun 6, 2025 12:16:26 ago (+0/-1)

I said according to logic, not evidence. It's called consensus. Are you trying to fuck with me, or are just an illiterate imbecile? Did you bother to read the OP, or shitspamming?

[ - ] deleted 1 point 10 hoursJun 6, 2025 12:17:53 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Reunto -1 points 8 hoursJun 6, 2025 14:04:34 ago (+0/-1)

If you don't believe Jesus existed it likely means that you aren't a historian and aren't applying consistent practices with historical evidence.

For instance, why would you rule out the Bible as a source of evidence?