Sign into an existing account

https://files.catbox.moe/lxxrqe.jpg
How do we convince @Master_foo to get off Hell's path by accepting Jesus Christ in faith, and loving and serving Him forever?

John 8:24 I told you that you would die in your sins, for unless you believe that I am he you will die in your sins.”

The Bible says faith in Jesus Christ is the ONLY way to avoid eternal conscious suffering. (John 14:6)

Wake-up call to accept Christ.

Here's the latest, on the spot, precise and detailed reporting right from the front line in what has been a long drawn out war. If there is such a thing as a justified war, with it's vicious screams, the gnashing of teeth and projectile mucous, then here it is.

The war on coons is real and the casualties are impressive. With a kill to rnd ratio of 1:1, one shot one kill, the body count can sometimes be as high as 3 per night and tonight there's a mob wandering around and just now I lit up my radius and I've got eyes looking right at me so I'm going to sign off for now and whack him, maybe #2 tonight

THE FUCKING SKITTERS TONIGHT ARE RIGHT FUCKING ✡ISH

Later

A package of toilet paper lasts me forever. I only use it to blow my nose.

If I take a particularly oily greasy nasty dump like @PeckerwoodPerry does when he eats too much smoked mullet I tidy up with a baby wipe.

I save a lot of money on toilet paper though.

@Conspamojeetologist

The next war needs to be a good ole fashion pogrom of all jews.

Despite how easy it would be to say 'the usual suspects are responsible' I think the culprit was not the u.s., nor israel, nor the ukes.

I believe the culprits involved are among the following list: Saudi Arabia, Turkey, or China.

I could write a wall of text about why but it boils down to cui bono - who benefits if russia or the u.s. or the u.k fire on each other?

Russia has already said in ww3 they would target israel, so israel starting it is a no go. Despite all the proclaimations that this side or that side is composed of mad men, you look at the actions actually taken, and its always escalation up to the brink but never past it. Thats the behavior of organizations that are wild to be sure, but it shows there are rational actors involved. This is about interests, not destruction for destructions sake.

Look at the sauds, they want out from under the u.s. heel. Their overtures to BRICS makes way more sense in that light. But they can't get away with israel on their doorstep, let alone the u.s.
The u.s. being caught up in some sort of regional ww3 and mutually destroying/being destroyed in some conflagration leaves the sauds to shrug off u.s. control. I won't say they were directly responsible for 9/11 (because we know who that was) but they did have a hand in it.

Now look at Turkey. They've played russia, china, and the u.s. against each other for years. Nothing would satisfy them more than to have their main rival for control of the middle east, Iran, destroyed in the secondary bombings that would follow from russia, the u.k., and the u.s. bombing each other to ruin. Playing the fence is Turkey's m.o.

Now look at china. The war has been pushing russia right into the arms of the CCP. The only real challenge now that the question of multipolarity is settled, is who gets the lions share. A ruined russia would be at the mercy of china, and the theatre of war starting in europe or the middle east leaves china's hands clean, for them to dominate BRICS and use the leverage from rebuilding/refinancing to reweight the basket of currencies to prefer the RMB or yuan, and the others involved would have to take it or leave it.

Now look at the three nations involved, taking out the first radar, facing west, makes any subsequent attacks suspect of coming from the u.k. israel, the ukes, or america.

Then the second radar gets hit, and it leaves attacks from the middle east wide open, and no one could know for sure.
Who has the capabilities to do that in the list of those who have motive?
The sauds prefer terror attacks, and lack the cyber and space command to do something like that. So while they have motive, they don't have means.

That leaves turkey or china.

And wouldn't turkey make the perfect bait? The m.e. is wide open for missile launches against russia. No one would know for sure who launched. Turkey has the means. Turkey has the motive.

Who benefits.

What it looks like is someone is trying to start a full blown war between the u.k. russia and america.

My bet is u.s. intelligence isn't saying it, but they don't have a fucking clue who actually took out those radars.

I'd say Iran, because they have the cyber and space tech to guide those missiles, and arguably the islamists would be happy to see a few hundred million christians obliterated in a war, along with israel, but its too obvious a target, and Iran mostly fights through proxies and has a defensive posture (despite their bluster) so I find that unlikely.

It's turkey or china making big opportunistic moves.

This is all conjecture of course, but I'd bet money on it.