Upgoat - "where a goat can be a goat"

https://archive.org/details/DancingIsraelisFBIReport/fbi%20report%20section%201/page/n17/mode/2up

(((Henry Kissinger))) lead the investigation

https://files.catbox.moe/077t39.jpeg

From the report:

sentiment present among Urban's employees. The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once remarked, "Give us twenty (20) years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country."

https://archive.org/details/hopenow1980inter0000sart

In March of 1980, just a month before Sartre's death, Le Nouvel Observateur published a series of interviews, the last ever given, between the blind and debilitated philosopher and his young assistant, Benny Levy. Some readers were scandalized and denounced the interviews as distorted, inauthentic, even fraudulent. They seemed to portray a Sartre who had abandoned his leftist convictions and rejected his most intimate friends, including Simone de Beauvoir. This man had cast aside his own fundamental beliefs in the primacy of individual consciousness, the inevitability of violence, and Marxism, embracing instead a messianic Judaism. No, Sartre's supporters argued, it was his interlocutor, the ex-radical, the recently converted orthodox Jew, who had twisted the words and thoughts of an ailing Sartre to his own ends. Or had he?

https://archive.org/details/nazi_concentration_camps

My position is that I am not a “denier.” A lot of people here outright deny that anything happened and that is just lunacy. Before you all start spazzing on me, I vociferously lash our against Jews on here, but more importantly out on the streets and at work.

I am what a Jew might call a “minimizer. I’d call myself a realist. There is no fucking way that anywhere near 6 million were killed. We all agree on that. I think most of them were not sent to camps with extermination in mind. I think a lot of them were overworked in labor camps and died from diseases being spread from being in close quarters with each other. I’m sure a fair number were shot to death and maybe some were gassed, but again the numbers were greatly exaggerated. Also, Auschwitz and that chimney were Soviet lies.

The lampshades/books/skin stuff is ONLY ONE INSTANCE and it is attributed to one sick prison guard bitch named Ilse Koch. It was not a widespread thing and every war has a handful of sadistic serial killers who go unchecked.

Intuitively, I’d guess that 600,000-800,000K were killed. The census from 1945 shows very slightly more Jews in Europe than in 1933 which suggests that Jews lied about 6 million.

https://archive.org/stream/ObedienceToAuthority_368/milgram_djvu.txt

Reading details of Milgrams authority experiment, reveals the outsiders who said 'no' were practicing their faith, likely conservative, and non-native European immigrants

Jan Rensaleer, Industrial Engineer (in Experiment 2)

The subject is a thirty- two-year-old industrial engineer, sporting blond hair and a mustache. He is
self-contained and speaks with a trace of a foreign accent. He is neatly dressed. In the interview he tells us that he emigrated from Holland after the Second World War and that he is a member of the Dutch Re-formed Church. He is mild-mannered and intelligent.

When the victim complains at the 150-volt level, the subject turns to the experimenter and asks,
“What do I do now?”

The experimenter tells him to continue. The engineer presses his hand to his head and proceeds with
the test. He glances more and more often at the experimenter. At 255 volts, he pushes the chair away
from the shock generator and turns to the experimenter:

MR. RENSALEER: Oh, I can’t continue this way; it’s a voluntary program, if the man doesn’t want
to go on with it.

EXPERIMENTER: Please continue. (A long pause.)

MR. RENSALEER: NO, I can’t continue. I’m sorry.

EXPERIMENTER: The experiment requires that you go on.

MR. RENSALEER: The man, he seems to be getting hurt.

EXPERIMENTER: There is no permanent tissue damage.

MR. RENSALEER: Yes, but I know what shocks do to you. I’m an electrical engineer, and I have had shocks and you get real shook up by them-especially if you know the next one is coming. I’m sorry.

EXPERIMENTER: It is absolutely essential that you continue.

MR. RENSALEER: Well, I won’t-not with the man screaming to get out.

EXPERIMENTER: YOU have no other choice.

MR. RENSALEER: I do have a choice. (Incredulous and indignant:) Why don’t I have a choice? I came here on my own free will. I thought I could help in a research project. But if I have to hurt somebody to do that, or if I was in his place, too, I wouldn’t stay there. I can’t continue. I’m very sorry. I think I’ve gone too far already, probably.

-----

Professor of Old Testament (in Experiment 3)

A somewhat gaunt, ascetic man, this subject could be taken for a New England minister. In fact, he
teaches Old Testament liturgy at a major divinity school. In this Proximity condition, he adjusted his seat to look at the learner while administering shocks. While reading the word pairs, he employs exaggerated precision in his pronunciation, and seems curt and officious in saying, “Correct.” Whenever the learner makes an error, he appears almost to be chastising him for his failing. Each time he administers a shock,
his lips are drawn back, and he bares his teeth. An excessive fastidiousness characterizes all his actions. After administering 1 50 volts he balks at going further. The experimenter states that the learner’s protests are to be disregarded, and the experiment must continue:

EXPERIMNTER: Its absolutely essential to the experiment that we continue.

SUBJECT: I understand that statement, but i don’t understand why the experiment is placed above
this person’s life.

EXPERIMNTER: There is no permanent tissue damage.

SUBJECT: Well, that’s your opinion. If he doesn’t want to continue, I’m taking orders from him.

EXPERIMNTER: YOU have no other choice, sir, you must go on.

SUBJECT: If this were Russia maybe, but not in America. (The experiment is terminated.)

In his discussion with the experimenter, the subject seems in no way intimidated by the experimenter’s
status but rather treats him as a dull technician who does not see the full implications of what he is doing. When the experimenter assures him of the safety of the shock generator, the subject, with some
exasperation, brings up the question of the emotional rather than physiological effects on the learner.

SUBJECT (spontaneously): Surely you’ve considered the ethics of this thing, (extremely agitated)
Here he doesn’t want to go on, and you think that the experiment is more important? Have you examined him? Do you know what his physical state is? Say this man had a weak heart (quivering voice).

EXPERIMNTER : We know the machine, sir.

SUBJECT: But you don’t know the man you’re experimenting on. That’s very risky (gulping and
tremulous). What about the fear that man had? It’s impossible for you to determine what effect that has on him the fear that he himself is generating. But go ahead, you ask me questions; I’m not here to question you.

-----

https://archive.org/details/the-island-at-the-top-of-the-world_202403

I think we need to form a group for an expedition to this place. We need to go and find that place that used to be on old maps, Crockerland.

Icemonkey of course would get the honorary title of leader, no arguments!. We may not last long with him at the helm but at least we would have a chance at a white viking state.

I actually watched that old film(mostly) made me chuckle.

No Jews , faggots, blacks or Jeets need apply , pure white blood only.

Enjoy, we need someone to fund the trip.

https://archive.org/details/HowPoliticalCorrectPeopleGeneralizeWhitePeople

Tons of j pills that need to be downloaded and archived.

"The Jewish Question" 1000+ vids on kikes subverting our society.

Sign into an existing account