4
russian book in english about the upcoming technocratic state      (link.springer.com)
submitted by dosvydanya_freedomz to Technocracy 5 months ago (+4/-0)
0 comments...
-4
About 10 Million Americans don't know to have cognitive impairment, and doctors struggle to identify it     (link.springer.com)
submitted by Conspirologist to Health 1.1 years ago (+2/-6)
3 comments last comment...
0
A critical assessment of extreme events trends in times of global warming     (link.springer.com)
submitted by obvious to ClimateChangeSkeptic 1.2 years ago (+1/-1)
0 comments...
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02243-9

"In conclusion on the basis of observational data, the climate crisis that, according to many sources, we are experiencing today, is not evident yet. "
Wait, What, Climate Chains Not Evident?!?!?! Counter shibboleth narrative alert, iconoclast truth retracted!
5
Whole body gestational donation - They kill the braindead body of the mother after delivery.      (link.springer.com)
submitted by Sector7 to whatever 1.8 years ago (+5/-0)
0 comments...
4
Over 17% of teens have heart problems after vaxx     (link.springer.com)
submitted by Conspirologist to Universal 1.9 years ago (+6/-2)
0 comments...
0
Predicting the impact of online news articles – is information necessary?     (link.springer.com)
submitted by Monica to PredictiveProgramming 1.9 years ago (+1/-1)
1 comments last comment...
-1
An Analysis of Online Discussion Platforms for Academic Deliberation Support     (link.springer.com)
submitted by paul_neri to SocialMedia 2 years ago (+0/-1)
0 comments...
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-58562-8_8

Conclusion

"Online discussions require adequate Web-based software application to support people in proposing ideas for action and argumenting regarding the consequences of these options, for a deliberation. Although literature has proposed platforms to this end and studied human behaviour in this context, the design features of software platforms to support argumentation and debate of ideas in academic deliberations remains hardly investigated. In this paper, we conducted a comparative analysis of three online discussion platforms, based on a real academic context of use. Results revealed central aspects and limitations to guide the design of online deliberation software systems. We found that the discussion quality is highly dependent on the design choices the participants encounter for elaboration of well directed propositions. Further research involves a thorough characterization of the nature and values of academic discussion and the co-design and development of a situated-interaction platform.".