Sign into an existing account

Don't forget about me! https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=61a2909a4b7f8

Let me run through this point by point:

I do not need a belief system to convince you of. I trust that you have lived in the same world I have and that you know right from wrong. My morals come from my parents teachings and life experience, knowing what hurts and what feels good, empathy, being able to predict the results of my actions and how they will affect the world.

I didn't insult Christ or your belief therein. Chances are you never consciously sat down and picked Christianity as the religion to worship so how can I insult you for living with the beliefs you were taught?

And yes I will conflate Christianity with Judaism and with Islam. They are a continuation of the same story, in the same settings, with the same characters, at the same time period, in the same location.. These three religions are inherently conflated by virtue of branching from the same original Abrahamic stem religion. As you can see, the conflation is inherent and I am not doing the conflation, merely bringing attention to it.

I don't know about Christianity destroying the west, but Christianity was with 100% certainty used to destroy Eastern Europe. Tuetonic orders massacred villages. Christendom reform burned ancient libraries. Destroyed artifacts. Erased history. Erased our true identity and replaced it with jew import desert fantasy.

The claims that I want to strip you of identity and heritage are absolute falsehood. I want you to rediscover your identity and your heritage and to find for yourself what you believe. The time period of Christianity is but a speck against the backdrop of the time period in which White humans have lived.

account deleted by user

Very true. Ask one of these larpagans to recite the norse noble virtues or the fables of Odin and suddenly they're really tight lipped.

I actually like some of the ancient norse beliefs and have read up on it, however paganism is inherently accepting of faggots and feminism and must be stamped out.

When you get rid of cancer, what do you replace the cancer with?

When you get rid of jews, what do you replace the jews with?

You don't need to replace jewish propaganda with anything. Without it, people will find their way on their own as our ancestors did for thousands of years before jews enslaved us.

I'm pretty clear on my belief system. I worship the White-Race.

Your jew-god says you can not have two masters and you chose the jew-god as your master.

account deleted by user

Bullshit, I'm an atheist and I've been very forthcoming with what I believe in.

epistemology: the philosophical and scientific methodologies.  Nothing is certain aside from the existence of one's own consciousness (as the no more than the receiver of experiences) in some uncertain form, and nothing is impossible aside from that which I logically impossible (that which has a self-contradictory nature that necessarily refutes itself), beyond these two things, everything else exists on a spectrum of certainty regarding its probability of truth. Objects (anything which exists or could conceivably exist, people included) are nothing more than a bundle of properties that can be observed from the perspective of some conceivable subject, the aggregate of which define the object's identity as being what it is.

Ethics: Everything is a "game" (a goal that should/must be pursued and a set of restrictions that shouldn't/may not be violated in pursuit of that goal). The purpose of life is that which is given by the processes which govern its existence, such as evolution; the purpose being to maximize the number of living organisms with genes identical to your own, maximize the amount of genes which are identical to your own that exist in other living organisms, and maximize the both of these things as far into the future as possible.
Where most answers to the meaning of life treat reproduction as optional in living a good life, the answer given by the process of evolution of the diversity of species by means of natural selection treats it as the essence of a life well lived, and most organisms are failures from this perspective, being good to your fellow living things is hedonistically satisfying, but only because of an instinct that evolved into you because organisms with the genes which create pro-social behaviors had been better at propagating these genes than organisms without them had been at propagatingbthe genes creating their anti-social traits, this trait that encourages self-sacrificing altruism all comes down to Hamilton's laws regarding the selection of kin, and the gene-centered evolutionary version of game theory, which discourages commitment to indiscriminate antipathy as well as indiscriminate empathy.
As this purpose is what has produced the instincts which gave rise to the concept of morality in humans, it must thus be factored into any moral system which a human abides by, the significance being that normative ethics must be rejected in favor of relative ethics - instead of treating all subjects as being of equivalent moral value relative to the actor, the relationship between the actor and subjects is considered when evaluating the morality of the action, a moral hierarchy is created, where both genetic similarity and generational difference of the subjects in relation to the actor are used to determine the actor's moral obligations towards the subjects being affected by their actions.
Meaning that who the people being affected by one's actions matter I'm the consideration of the morality of the act, and this is judged by a standard relative to one's own identity, note that this doesn't put any organisms beyond moral obligation entirely, as everything is related to some degree, but instead creates a system where the good of one group of organisms can be given a higher priority relative to oneself over the good of another group of organisms.
Beyond that, we can create the rest of the ethical system simply by combining the utilitarian ratio with the principle of non-aggression, using the former to define "good" (for use in conjunction with the above paragraphs), and using violations of the latter to define "evil" (that which should be placed in a ratio beneath the "good" when measuring the "goodness" of the action, basically it serves to place the "goodness" in proportion to the "evil" used to achieve it, to put the ends in proportion to the means, using the value of the latter to divide up the value of the former, to see if in any case, whether the ends is truly justified by the means used to arrive at them).
The utilitarian ratio being births, pleasure, happiness, and justified beliefs over deaths, suffering, sorrow, and unjustified beliefs. Basically everything we perceive positively over everything we perceive negatively.
The non-aggression principle is the idea that you own your person (including your personal space) and your property (anything physical, except anything recognized as being another human being), and that any direct physical and intentional interaction must be done through the medium of voluntary and informed mutual consent in order to be morally permissible (should any such interaction become necessary but become complicated due to some limitations on the part of one or more of the involved parties, such as a child, then they could be represented by a capable party, such as their parents, who could provide such consent on the behalf of the incapable party).

so now you know approximately where I stand regarding what is and what ought to be done about it.

Further beliefs include that there is no free will and everything people do is determined by the combination of their genes and experiences, no one has any more control over what they do than they do over what they are, as both are determined by thevsane two factors, of which genes take precedence. You have no more choice in being racist than you have in being of your race.

Rabbi Chink-nigger's playbook.

Salute the Hamburgler!

I see the devil worshipers are out in force today. Their hatred of Christians and Christianity knows no bounds. I wonder, is there another group of people who bears an extremely similar loathing of Christians and Christianity?

JIDF working overtime here.

I insult every monotheistic religion. I’m currently making my own religion since it’s all metaphorical nonsense to help guide you on a path to not be a shitty person. Apparently people need a book that brings existential threat of eternal damnation in order to get people to understand a simple concept of treat others the way you want to be treated? Honestly if humans are that stupid I don’t really wanna be involved with them at all anymore

So you are on Voat/Talk/pol and you are mad that you will find people here trashing Christianity?

The mere fact that you see them trash it while avoiding the fact that they follow trends given to them and funded by the jews in the letter (atheism, false denominations of Christianity such as Jehova's witnesses - created by a jew in the letter, and so on and so forth) should tell you that they are mere hypocrites.

There is no point in you warning us of something that we all know. Is like trying to warn everybody here about the fact that jews in the letter funded pornography or control the mainstream media, or the banks. We all know about it.

As a Christian your sole purpose is to spread the Truth of the Word of God, whatever they decide to do with it, is entirely their choice and is between them and God.

Yes, we Christians know that we will be slandered, compared with the synagogue of Satan by those ignorant to the Word of God, but does that make it true? No.

Yes, you will see that there is a big number of them here, and some of the users that you named are well known for spreading false information and conflating true Christians to members of a sect because they can't understand and will not learn to understand what faith truly is, nor where our faith comes from. They in fact will conflate faith with hope and then try to put their "faith" (meaning pride) in man, which shows how foolish they are. The natural man will never understand the things of the Spirit.

Arguing with those fools will only drag you down to their level and there is no point in wasting time with them or trying to go ahead and give them any type of importance. Your sole importance is to spread the Truth and only the Truth: SALVATION IS THROUGH GRACE GIVEN BY JESUS CHRIST. It is a personal choice and one have to believe it with one's heart and mind, and confess it with one's mouth then, be reborn in water.

I spent some time reading the triggered answers of so many people here, including a sand-nigger that spreads ecumenism in honor of a pedophile warmonger. Others false prophets basing Christianity on the whore of the Revelations - the catholic church - when they don't realize that the same "church" pursued and hunted down the real saints that believed in having a personal relationship with God and learning about God through the Bible in their homes.

Is simply laughable.

Don't get me wrong, I know plenty of respectable catholics, and as comforting as it is to me that they do believe in Jesus as their savior, most of their brethren believe salvation is through the institution of the church and call "father" their priests without realizing that is heresy.

Many, if not all of the slanderers of Christianity that say to be against the jews in the letter - said kikes - think that the fact there are false prophets of Christianity that prey on the easily fooled, like John Hagee, makes Christianity flawed. Without realizing that the Word of God already warns us about these wolves dressed in sheep clothing.

Even in the times of Jesus, and before those days, there were already false prophets walking the earth. We are to point who those false prophets are. Because through them, these slanderers will base their so-called arguments that Christianity is false and/or contradicts itself. However, they conveniently deny the fact that true Christians denounce them. They conveniently deny the fact that true Christians denounce the synagogue of Satan. They overlook the fact that jews in the letter will finance any movement that looks to attack Christianity, delegitimize it, render it a foolish belief. And hence they will overlook that jews in the letter financed both sides of every war including Hittler's. Only a few will recognize that Hittler was a zionist and wanted to give jews their own land so they were not in his.

True Christians are against zionism, because our Israel is of the Spirit. NOT the satanic and foul earthly one that false prophets and baseless ignorant people link us with.

True Christians believe that salvation is for everybody - doesn't matter whether they are spic, niggers, crackers, yellers, sand niggers or public defecators. But the choice is theirs and their judge, as ours, will be God alone.

So I don't care what they put in here to slander Christianity. As I used to say in old Voat, their disdain to my faith strengthens my faith. Their continuous effort to lie to themselves and ignore the fact that they are mere stooges of the synagogue of Satan makes me laugh and also makes me feel pity for their willfully ignorance.

Share the Truth, the more they attack it, shows how true the Word of God is. So rejoice in their attacks.

What life has thought me is that convenience is the most powerful drug there is. And so many spiritually weak people will use it. So be not offended by them, but rather pray for them to open their eyes. Whether they do or not before the Time comes, well it is up to them and even then, you know, they will all see how God loves us.

Not Antichristian, but definitely not gung-ho about Christianity, either. I see it used so much more for serving Jewish interests than not. Don't get me wrong, I've witnessed many badass Christians that seem like really good people, and I'm glad those types are out there shutting down faggotry in a public way.
It just so fucking gay to see Christians (Whites) picking Jewish crops for them (for free after they traveled halfway around the world on their own dime), and them being excited about it. I wouldn't dislike it to the point I do now if I didn't see gay shit like that happening.

In any event, even among Whites, there's been a "multicultural-isation" happening...Religion. Either way that's bad. It's just another hurdle for us.

You guys really need a book to tell you how to live, huh? So much for superior white intelligence and altruism. Do you really believe you would be immoral without Hebrew fairy tales? It wasn't necessary for the eons that shaped whites into what made them superior.