☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
16

More proof jab not work (pdf in description)

submitted by Kozel to Controlavirus 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 10:56:57 ago (+17/-1)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/3548ct.jpg



7 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] 2017Fallout 0 points 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 16:52:52 ago (+0/-0)

Also bars to represent relative proportions in the populations.

[ - ] Prairie 2 points 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 15:07:03 ago (+2/-0)

Conclusion assumes that jabs were given randomly. If jabs were given more to vulnerable populations, you'd expect a higher case rate.

[ - ] account deleted by user 1 point 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 23:15:15 ago (+1/-0)

account deleted by user

[ - ] Belrick 0 points 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 16:59:48 ago (+0/-0)

80% of the total population shot means randomness is really minimal

[ - ] Prairie 0 points 3.2 yearsFeb 25, 2022 02:55:56 ago (+0/-0)

There doesn't have to be a lot of skew from randomness to give the variations shown. The most variant one is about 20% higher than the unjabbed. You'd expect all the old people to be jabbed, and the unjabbed to be mostly young people, at a lower risk. Top and bottom 20%.

What the graph does show is that the vaxx, it does (little to) nothing.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 13:42:50 ago (+0/-0)

They're working alright. That's what we call vaccine blowback.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 3.2 yearsFeb 24, 2022 12:51:53 ago (+0/-0)

I think that shows that they are working quite well.