Fired by Fox News. Truthteller Lara Logan was Anti-Zelenski, Anti-Vaxx, dismissive of the "insurgency" of Jan. 6, 2021 and claimed that Darwinism was a fraud theory paid for by the Jews - Upgoat

Fired by Fox News. Truthteller Lara Logan was Anti-Zelenski, Anti-Vaxx, dismissive of the "insurgency" of Jan. 6, 2021 and claimed that Darwinism was a fraud theory paid for by the Jews
submitted by beece to LyingNewsMedia 3 yearsApr 9, 2022 20:39:13 ago (+34/-2) (archive.ph)
https://archive.ph/iAEih

10 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] mikenigger -2 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 01:25:31 ago (+0/-2)

based

kill yourself, nobody cares

[ - ] Boone_Clone 1 point 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 03:59:33 ago (+1/-0)

Darwinism is a communist ideology.

[ - ] NedsHead 1 point 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 07:26:42 ago (+1/-0)

Was it Lara Logan that was raped by packs of muslims during the Arab spring?

[ + ] beece

[ - ] beece [op] 0 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 10:06:04 ago (+0/-0)

@NedsHead - It was, details in link. https://therearenosunglasses.wordpress.com/2011/02/21/warning-explicit-details-of-degrading-sexual-attack-on-lara-logan-in-egypt/

[ - ] Ironcrusader88 4 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 00:13:13 ago (+4/-0)

Darwin was a Freemason so it makes sense why his theories were so heavily promoted. I’m still on the fence on evolution tho. I believe that adaptation of some kind does exist I just don’t think what they’re telling us is the truth tbh. There must be more to earth’s history that the Jews aren’t telling us and I’m starting to think maybe the creationists might be on to something at the very least. It shouldn’t be that much of a controversy to at least hear their arguments

[ + ] 1Icemonkey

[ - ] 1Icemonkey 2 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 01:29:37 ago (+2/-0)

Creationists as of late,have pointed out that science as of late, has recognized that creationists are right, as of late.

It’s late and I’m tired. The science says I must rest in order to create, tomorrow. 😜

[ + ] Europeanawakening

[ - ] Europeanawakening 2 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 02:35:13 ago (+3/-1)*

It's not a controversy to hear their arguments. It's a controversy when their arguments are taught in science class because their arguments are pseudo science.their arguments are either unfalsifiable or easily refuted with a cursory understanding of geology, astronomy, and biology. High school level courses in these subjects are enough to falsify most creationist claims of things like the global flood, 6000 year Earth, etc.

[ + ] zongongo

[ - ] zongongo 0 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 14:06:41 ago (+0/-0)

You say.

[ + ] happytoes

[ - ] happytoes 0 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 14:21:31 ago (+0/-0)

Don't forget Alfred Wallace. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/alfred-wallace/

By 1850, a lot of relevant facts about plant and animal breeding were widely known. If one person was slow to join the dots, some-one else would scoop them (and nearly did!). Doubting evolution because of doubts about Charles Darwin is a bit like disbelieving infinitesimal calculus because you don't like Germans and Leibniz was a German; you should only trust English mathematics :-)

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 5 points 3 yearsApr 10, 2022 07:24:46 ago (+5/-0)

Oh so close. She was doing so well until her thoughts on Darwinism.

Sign into an existing account