Sign into an existing account

So it looks like we are going to get a divine plague every 40 years now because of these faggots.

This was posted before

It’s so astronomically disgusting that it deserves a whole month of focus so everyone can see just how sick faggotry really is.

everyone who had to read that, is now both gayer and dumber

It's kind of insane when you tell a gay man not to have the most disgustingly degenerate forms of sex (often involving the consumption or exposure to human waste, like this "piss party") with hundreds of complete strangers (often in some festival-like event such as at parties or in clubs) and their response is "stop telling us not to have sex", as if this is what sex is to a gay man, and that they cannot conceive of anything other than this level of depravity as an option for their sexual behaviors.

They aren't "like straight people just with only one sex involved", heterosexuals don't consider it normal sexual activity to go to events where they drink the urine of hundreds of strangers.

Heterosexuals simply don't behave in such repulsively degenerate and recklessly promiscuous ways, and no, it's not a matter of opportunity, if a straight guy could have access to hundreds of random women for sex, it's very likely he wouldn't behave like fags do, because straight men tend to be much more capable of self-restraint.

I say this because we've had harems in the past, historical records allow us to know what a straight guy does when he's surrounded by women who are sexually available to him, and he doesn't engage in this kind of unhinged debauchery when the opportunity is put before him.

Only fags do this kind of insane shit and act like it's normal, nothing to be alarmed about.

I'd go even further, and say that it's only gays who exist at very specific points in history, before a major societal collapse or revolutionary revival occurs, often with this kind of perverse indulgence as a contributing factor.

Most fags throughout history have stuck to the "heteronormative" expectation of being limited to a select number of sexual partners whose identities are known and with whom there is a relationship that extends beyond just sexual activity, with prostitution as the exception.

Even when it comes to sexual activity between men, there are moral limitations on what is acceptable and what is not, it's only when "queer" socio-political ideology enters the picture that a culture emerges which encourages all these sorts of traditions to be broken, often with disastrous results for them and the greater civilization that surrounds them.

Traditions are darwinian in nature, traditions are what emerge organically when people learn about the consequences that follow each actions they can take, everyone makes their decisions, and some choices come back with better or worse results than others.
Over time, the paths one takes which have worse results serve to make less people pursue them, and those with better results draw more people to them, and eventually the better options become the traditional ways of doing things, while the worse ways become the traditional taboos that exist within the meta-culture of the society.

Now, traditions aren't always valid, and they can change over time, the culture of today has a tradition that you don't say or do specific things, and on here we certainly break this taboo, but the taboo exists because the cultural marxist establishment's order of today will come down and visit various forms of punishment upon you should you break these cultural rules.

The consequences that support the traditions we break with are artificially created, and they are weakening, which means soon the traditions themselves will change, as they should.

These queers instead deviate from traditions that are reinforced by natural consequences, the kind that exist even when all of society is pulling for them in a big way, and that places them in a different kind of "outsider" position than us, it doesn't matter what kind of civilization they exist in, nature itself, human nature included, is what will ultimately wreck their asses (get it?) for doing what they do.

They do the equivalent of drinking poison, it's not society that makes it deadly to them, poison is inherently harmful, and while you may survive drinking some of it, possibly without any immediate harmful effects, over the long term, it's inevitable that you will be having a bad time later on.

Then we all have to deal with it, both in being taxed in various ways to support the results of their poor decision making and ignorance of the lessons of history regarding what they've chosen to do, and in being blamed for somehow being responsible for their self-destruction, because in a society where the responsibility does not fall on the responsible, it's always shifted to some scapegoat who everyone is okay with shoving the burden of guilt onto.

On that note, let's talk about the way the left speaks, the left thinks in stories and narratives, they are influenced more by fiction than by reality, and it shows in how they conduct themselves, they know that the people who make media of any kind use specific kinds of speech and behaviors to convey signals that the audience uses to identify the role the characters re supposed to play within the work.

But this also relies upon the audience being receptive to the way the work characterizes the cast, if the audience can see them in a different light, or at least entertain some alternative interpretation of them, much of the signals given off by them lose their effect.

The ability to use positive behavior reinforcement is waning among the leftist elite, leading to these authorities changing from the use of soft power carrot-and-stick measures to more openly authoritarian iron fist all-stick tactics.

This fittingly comes at a time when they've lost credibility and reputation among most people who have ceased to see them as noble or wise, and now see them as liars and abusers who manipulate people into acting against their own interests and tolerating the harms done against them by these meta-cult leaders.

This is how the overton window shifts, when people recognize the people at the head of dictating culture as being unfit to do so.

They can't pull at our heartstrings by putting out the signals we associate with people we should listen to with their reliance upon oscar or academy worthy performances where they intentionally behave in ways we recognize from our heroes written on the pages of pulp or filmed on the silver screen, which you may note was always the kinds of dramatic things that monsters like these tend to do.

Seriously, listen to how these assholes in influential position on the left speak, it's like they are hollywood actors following their scripts, playing the role of the good guys with a cause to advocate for, a client to defend, or a villain to take down.

It's obvious that they are aping movie heroes as a way to tap into the signals we associate with heroism, or their are imitating the signals of what hollywood associates with the innocent victim desperately looking for fairness and justice.

But the feigned tears or self-righteous bluster of a manipulative piece of shit lose their effect once you realize that they are manipulators with a flair for the dramatic, and we know these guys are totally corrupt individuals. The old act of the righteous hero or innocent victim has lost it's magic.

We feel better for hardening our hearts to their intentionally pathetic pleas, or being unmoved by their clearly rehearsed speeches and smart-assed replies ripped straight out of a script.

We've woken up to the fact that reality differs from all of fiction in certain ways, one of which is that the things which color a character as a hero or victim in fiction are the things we use in reality to identify a predatory or deceptive manipulator in real life.

When someone starts sounding like a character in a work of fiction, they are most likely mentally ill, but if they exist in some place of power (any kind of ability to influence people in what they think, say, or do), they likely have some agenda that isn't in your best interests, but which they are trying to get you to go along with anyway.

Beware of individuals who sound like the characters in a work of fiction, they are playing a role, and this role is one they've put on because their true face is something they have reason to keep hidden from you.

Politicians, especially the left wing ones of today, are trained to act and speak in ways that imitate fictional heroes or victims, this means using the signals that stimulate people to see them as such, and see their opposition as being villainous or perpetrators. But the magic is wearing off, when you know that the actor behind the character is a colossal douchebag, their performance's ability to move us is harmed.

We can thank the internet for breaking this spell that was cast over us by the cultural marxists working in media production, the killing blow will be when right wing media comes out and starts satirizing and parodying the decades of media we've had entire generations raised on.

My idea for a meta take on it is when we see the worlds of fiction and reality cross over, so that we can see the differences between our world and a fictional world that is as close to ours as could be.

There's no truly useless and unsympathetic people in fiction, everyone has at least some talent, and those who aren't talented are at least good enough to be sympathetic, what about some retarded kid who goes around randomly punching people, lying about it, and throwing screaming tantrums, even when he's reached his 30's, without any shred of self-awareness or remorse for what he's done?

Imagine showing that kind of nightmare person, and then going on to state that the proportion of the population who are like this dysgenic turd are on the rise, because we are doing all we can to keep them alive, while they do nothing for us, and they are therefore far better at surviving than we are, such that even if only a few of them are able to have kids, it's still setting them ahead.

In fiction, all the people we think are persecuted, are, and all the people we think are privileged, are, rather than in reality, where it's the people you can't acknowledge the persecution of who are persecuted, but widely considered privileged, and the people who are unable to be openly recognized as having been given special advantages, let alone what those advantages are, are the ones who are widely considered to be oppressed.

In fact, the persecuted ones are oppressed because they are considered to have privileges, and the privileged are given advantages because they are considered to be the ones suffering under oppression.

That's how it works today, where we have sympathy for the genetically inferior and for the losers of history that just couldn't compete with us in the past, and have come out ahead because of how bad they could make us feel for being winners.
Far from being sympathetic people, they are opportunistic parasites who gleefully feed off of our compassion.

repost of disgusting shit. probably a jew