☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
0

Gaming monitors have been lying to us, and it’s time they stopped

submitted by knightwarrior41 to gaming 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 01:10:11 ago (+0/-0)     (www.digitaltrends.com)

https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/gaming-monitors-have-been-lying-to-us/

do you agree or disagree with this article,if so discuss down below


16 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Kozel 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 01:22:30 ago (+2/-0)

I don't know enough of the specifics but I know enough to read about a monitor at TFTCentral or Overclock.net before considering a purchase.

[ - ] lolxd 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 01:52:44 ago (+0/-0)

Yes, gaming monitors are rife with sacks of shit that straight up lie or make products that meet whatever meets the most popular search request.

This is why blurbusters.com exists.

[ - ] Monica 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 05:07:19 ago (+0/-0)

Look up gaming chairs. They are also a big ripoff. Companies know they can ripoff gamers. A lot of retard fan bois out there. Monitors and TVs all lie to you. The specs are always some kind of bs where they manipulate the numbers to come to a pre-determined result.

[ - ] Her0n -5 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 01:46:45 ago (+0/-5)

All I know is screens and computers react to and present information far faster than any human being can process. 60 refresh rate? Your eyes are stuck at a solid 32, so what does the extra 28 fps even do for you?

I have always used ild equipment and have been on par with my skill level, a faster computer never improved my performance.

Of course the companies lie to get you to buy, all jew-owned companies lie.

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 4 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 02:56:39 ago (+4/-0)

There is a MASSIVE difference between 32fps and 60. It is so noticeable that it makes playing anything below 60 borderline impossible.

[ - ] Her0n -3 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 10:18:19 ago (+0/-3)

That's just like, your opinion man.

I've been gaming since atari Era and I can easily claim that games under 60 fps are still playable.

[ - ] Kozel 3 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 08:33:21 ago (+3/-0)

congratulations you're demonstrably a retard

https://files.catbox.moe/r8c5zs.gif

please shut the fuck up and don't talk about shit you don't know

[ - ] Her0n -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 10:14:16 ago (+0/-2)

That's fair, you keep your mouth shut unless someone asks about fucking gooks in that case.

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 21:47:58 ago (+0/-0)

stay mad retard

[ - ] Her0n 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 17, 2023 00:29:36 ago (+0/-0)

Race mixer

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 17, 2023 14:53:02 ago (+0/-0)

Its not race mixing if there's no children, retard.

[ - ] Her0n 0 points 2.3 yearsJan 17, 2023 15:17:29 ago (+0/-0)

Still gross

[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 2 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 02:11:16 ago (+2/-0)

It might just be you. I have never heard of a framerate for eyes. They're "analog." I guess 30 fps and 60 fps look the same to you?

[ - ] Her0n -2 points 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 10:16:46 ago (+0/-2)

Your eyes can't see a refresh rate faster than 32 frames. While high refresh rates may look smoother to your eyes, you aren't going to get anything worth the money you're putting into it.

I can play video games just as well on my shitty laptop as I can on a top end gaming PC. Maybe you're just spoiled?

[ - ] ghetto_shitlord 1 point 2.3 yearsJan 16, 2023 16:34:57 ago (+1/-0)

Source, cause this sounds like total horseshit. If this were true, high refresh rates wouldn't "look smoother to your eyes."

[ - ] BrokenVoat 0 points 2.3 yearsFeb 2, 2023 06:13:03 ago (+0/-0)

Your reaction time is like 10-5 milliseconds at best, requires 100-200 fps optimally tough 100 milliseconds is more normal speeds. Your brain refreshes parts of the visible information much faster than 32fps.