Sign into an existing account

what a retarded argument. height, atmospheric occulsion and optical resolution are what determine how far anything can be seen, regardless of the shape of earth. you cant see a plane from 200 miles away, right? people like you strengthen the flat earth movement with this retarded shit.

Can't even see the end of a hallway: https://files.catbox.moe/z31u7a.jpg

When you don't understand humidity.

The best argument about flat earth is that nothing important changes if it's flat or a ball. The fundamental purpose of the argument is to make conspiracy theories look stupid so to put people off real discussion of the global elites.

It's a shame a globey can't refute it huh.

See I knew Barad-dûr was located in Washington DC. Nobody would listen.

Things like this are funny. I'm convinced flat earth position are mostly Poe. But arguments are great for forcing research and reinforcing a better understanding.

It can also tease out the concept that it is better to look at the strongest form of your opponent's argument even if they themselves aren't proposing the strongest form.

Can you propose a flat earth interpretation that makes sense with the kinds of data commoners can verify themselves? Probably, but you are going to find that you have to implement all kinds of crazy optical rules for it to make sense.

Now look at those crazy optical rules and compare that to the use of Dark Matter in models to explain strange optical phenomena.

You're a retard. Take a 3rd grade art class and learn about perspective. It's very jewish of you to assert that the laws of perception are exclusive to a ball. What the laws of perception will not allow is the possibility to see beyond a physical horizon created by a spheres physical shape. But whatever. Just tell video game designers that they got it all wrong. They shouldn't be designing their vast game worlds on a flat digital plane.