You really think you could teach pajeets something different, something like Mandarin with thousands of symbols and the need to speak very precise in word and phonics?
Yeah good luck, fuck I'd like to talk to the man and ask him what he did, maybe the same methode can be carried over to niggers and other fields than lingustic.
This is silly. The british didnt create hindi. Hindi and Urdu are mutually intelligeable dialects of the same language, which is related to all other indo-european languages because white people colonized India 3500 years ago.
The british may have had a hand in standardizing the dialect of Hindi.
Gaelic for example was standardized by the Irish government and the British government in Scotland. These standards differ in pronunciation and spelling but neither were created by the standardized bodies. Standardization can influence the evolution of a language but it does not invent it.
More sophisticated nations create standards for their languages. Standardization is not an egalitarian process. For instance, “Kings english” and received pronunciation had disproportionate acceptance over other regional dialects because they were used at court. Perhaps you could say that these “prestige” dialects have a hint of artificiality to them in that they are promulgated by elites and tightly controlled within certain bounds of “acceptable usage”. But the evolution of language happens everywhere by more or less similar means.
Britons didn’t teach pajeets their language. Hindi is easily traced to Sanskrit, its still basically the same language and theres no evidence of brits contributing to Sanskrit or the invention of Devangari script
I'm beginning to think that all civilizations were originally started by White explorers of ancient times. There's just too much evidence of some White-skinned blonde/red headed, blue/green eyed god bringing the masses Law, Math, Money, Fire, the Wheel, etc.
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 03:39:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 04:07:34 ago (+1/-0)
You really think you could teach pajeets something different, something like Mandarin with thousands of symbols and the need to speak very precise in word and phonics?
Yeah good luck, fuck I'd like to talk to the man and ask him what he did, maybe the same methode can be carried over to niggers and other fields than lingustic.
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 0 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 05:07:03 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeavyBrain
[ - ] HeavyBrain 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 05:26:18 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 7 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 04:23:37 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 7 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 05:11:24 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 06:40:26 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 4 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 09:17:25 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] bonghits4jeebus
[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 12:47:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] doginventer
[ - ] doginventer 0 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 07:18:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 07:31:28 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ButtToucha9000
[ - ] ButtToucha9000 4 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 06:01:13 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] carnold03
[ - ] carnold03 0 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 08:49:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 09:40:39 ago (+3/-0)
The british may have had a hand in standardizing the dialect of Hindi.
Gaelic for example was standardized by the Irish government and the British government in Scotland. These standards differ in pronunciation and spelling but neither were created by the standardized bodies. Standardization can influence the evolution of a language but it does not invent it.
More sophisticated nations create standards for their languages. Standardization is not an egalitarian process. For instance, “Kings english” and received pronunciation had disproportionate acceptance over other regional dialects because they were used at court. Perhaps you could say that these “prestige” dialects have a hint of artificiality to them in that they are promulgated by elites and tightly controlled within certain bounds of “acceptable usage”. But the evolution of language happens everywhere by more or less similar means.
Britons didn’t teach pajeets their language. Hindi is easily traced to Sanskrit, its still basically the same language and theres no evidence of brits contributing to Sanskrit or the invention of Devangari script
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 12:12:02 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Smedleys_Butler
[ - ] Smedleys_Butler 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 18:57:57 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] -2 points 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 12:20:37 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer2
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer2 1 point 8 monthsAug 19, 2024 14:37:02 ago (+1/-0)