Emotional children in adult bodies that think they are always right and at the same time are always the victim. They are narricist with emotional issues super insecure and no empathy for other humans they are not real they just need to feel good for any amount of time to end the dread that is their narrisistic hell.
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 14:35:24 ago (+1/-0)*
It is useful to call it evil. It has a narrative purpose. Telling a story about women eating the apple gets the message across, right.
But the answer is simple. It's that women play a different moral game. There IS a universal set of moral facts, but those are excavated by men, and men are beholden to that God. Women play a moral game the boundaries of which extend to their immediate preferences and desires. They will reason after the fact according to rules they've picked up that they recognize are socially accepted. They'll play those things like tokens to explain themselves, but it's really just as simple as I've said. And it's only sometimes malicious. Some women really are malicious. But all women, regardless of these real differences in character, are built, when it comes to explaining actual behaviors (not what women will say in intellectual conversations), to pursue their own self-interest with methodological disregard for diplomacy. The game of being diplomatic falls on men, which is precisely why women stir shit up, and then men have to politick to mitigate those problems.
Women will disrupt your entire fucking society just for the sake of being rescued by the right one.
EDIT: I should be clear that this isn't like a metaphysical necessity. It's because we've built society this way, which is in part because of the way human evolution set the game up prior. It's not that men lack the capacity to be this way. They have it. It's just that being as successful as civilization has been has required men to be a certain way. They were the ones selected to be diplomats, and that frees the female side of the equation up to pursue selfish interests with less regard for diplomacy; this system works out well in the evolutionary sense.
Men have to check the female behavior. If men start acting "like women", it all goes to shit. One major utility of religious belief systems is that these give an additional layer of observation/checking to the male side of the equation, namely God.
[ + ] Peleg
[ - ] Peleg 4 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 10:13:59 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 2 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 12:11:54 ago (+2/-0)
Emotional children in adult bodies that think they are always right and at the same time are always the victim. They are narricist with emotional issues super insecure and no empathy for other humans they are not real they just need to feel good for any amount of time to end the dread that is their narrisistic hell.
Ask me how I know all this
[ + ] Metanoid
[ - ] Metanoid 0 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 16:14:51 ago (+0/-0)
The word is NAR-CISS-IST and the condition is NAR-CISS-ISM. The associated adjective is NAR-CISS-IST-IC.
Not messing with you, just want to help you say it right. Don't take it wrong man, just if you are going to talk about it a lot, learn to spell it.
[ + ] Metanoid
[ - ] Metanoid 0 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 16:17:13 ago (+0/-0)
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Narcissus-Greek-mythology
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 14:35:24 ago (+1/-0)*
But the answer is simple. It's that women play a different moral game. There IS a universal set of moral facts, but those are excavated by men, and men are beholden to that God. Women play a moral game the boundaries of which extend to their immediate preferences and desires. They will reason after the fact according to rules they've picked up that they recognize are socially accepted. They'll play those things like tokens to explain themselves, but it's really just as simple as I've said. And it's only sometimes malicious. Some women really are malicious. But all women, regardless of these real differences in character, are built, when it comes to explaining actual behaviors (not what women will say in intellectual conversations), to pursue their own self-interest with methodological disregard for diplomacy. The game of being diplomatic falls on men, which is precisely why women stir shit up, and then men have to politick to mitigate those problems.
Women will disrupt your entire fucking society just for the sake of being rescued by the right one.
EDIT: I should be clear that this isn't like a metaphysical necessity. It's because we've built society this way, which is in part because of the way human evolution set the game up prior. It's not that men lack the capacity to be this way. They have it. It's just that being as successful as civilization has been has required men to be a certain way. They were the ones selected to be diplomats, and that frees the female side of the equation up to pursue selfish interests with less regard for diplomacy; this system works out well in the evolutionary sense.
Men have to check the female behavior. If men start acting "like women", it all goes to shit. One major utility of religious belief systems is that these give an additional layer of observation/checking to the male side of the equation, namely God.
[ + ] VitaminSieg
[ - ] VitaminSieg 1 point 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 10:23:43 ago (+1/-0)
You fucking are now, faggot.
[ + ] Trumpman1488
[ - ] Trumpman1488 0 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 15:49:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] puremadness
[ - ] puremadness 0 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 15:27:37 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] con77
[ - ] con77 0 points 7 monthsOct 3, 2024 12:02:24 ago (+0/-0)
anonymous = MONKEYPOX!