Sign into an existing account

No. It describes perfectly the situation, if you were explained previously what it means. Right?

All implies perceivable sound...suggested words tempt ones consent into a conflict of reason by choosing to affirm or deny it.

Nature doesn't reason (vs)...it implicates (if/then)


Reasoning against one another over suggested words tempts one to ignore ones life sentence towards point of death. Ignorance implies cruising along towards outcome instead of resisting origin to sustain self.


Same (inception towards death) differentiates (life) by setting apart...few put letters together into words to tempt ALIKE consent by many to suggested meaning, hence the order following.

Furthermore...ones consent to the meaning of a suggested word implies LETTING others use LETTERS against one.


Con-fuse implies fusing together, which few establish by suggesting pluralism (people) to tempt consenting many together. In reality...each one implies person aka per sonos (by sound).

A chosen one suggests words like "insane person" to tempt ones choice to ignore building self discernment as in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound). The meaning of suggested words are called DEFINITIONS, because those who consent become DEAF PHONETICIANS aka deaf to phonics (sound).

OK. Do you prefer somebody warning you just by saying somebody else is a jerk or an asshole, or by explaining you in intelligible way why you should avoid such person?