Instead of all subs just having the blue link color (browser controlled?) and all subverse names looking the same, I think it would be helpful if there was a way to identify all the subs that have owners/mods that delete or block users.
As a free speech site, many users expect comments and discussions to be essentially unmoderated, except for the legal reasons. Yet some mods love to delete comments and block users for no reason, which then builds hate for them (think kicked out 109 times) and the mods claim to be "the victims" when users turn on them.
A way to indicate that a sub is censored would allow users to focus energies on truly free speech areas, and not give attention to the niggerfaggot mods that censor a free speech forum.
I don't have the best answer to how to do this, but one way would be to add the word "censored" next to the sub name in some fashion. Like sub "censored", or sub (censored), or whatever. Color would be another way, but if the browsers designate link colors then that wouldn't be standardized for everyone.
Or perhaps just a post will all the censored subs listed to help people - although that would eventually get buried and new users wouldn't be able to see the list right away.
Ah yes, the double standard being enforced against white men who created the sub v/combatfootage (created by @big_fat_dangus) and being taken away over a kikes tears @mikenigger by @system. I'll be the first to tell you that rules on this website are only enforced to help niggers and degenerates against white people. Prove me wrong system.
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 16:03:28 ago (+1/-0)
That's my big question too. I am a free speech absolutist and despise all these modded subs.
Apparently the owners/mods of non-default subs can censor the shit out of those subs, and there is no way of knowing which subs are censored (to me anyway, just as a casual user). Knowing where to spend my energy would be very helpful.
I agree that conspamologist should be yeeted. System has said that censorship in what could be considered "default" subs would transfer ownership of said subs back to default.
Of course, there is no guidance on which are default subs and which aren't.
There's also the double standard based on which users system responds to and "likes".
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 13:01:18 ago (+1/-0)
Thread, in case the niggerfaggot deletes everything
"Downvoting below zero is a math and logic fallacy because it defies how merit should be measured: through positive accumulation, not subtraction past a neutral point. In math, a tally—like votes—starts at zero and grows with support; you don’t dig into negatives to penalize, as that’s not a true count of value. "
You do know what a money pit is, right?
If you buy (or are LOL) a shitty product and have to spend more money to make that product actually work, that is a negative penalty - and totally destroys your argument. Edit Delete Reply Link...
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points
ago (+0/-0) I have no idea what you just said. Do you mind reposting in case you have problems to formulate your thoughts? Reply ParentLink...
[ - ] localsal 0 points
ago (+0/-0) Here's an example
Suppose all cars are the same price. In your thinking, with no negative penalty, how are the cars rated?
One of the ways that real products - like cars - are rated and reviewed is by how much it costs to keep the car running. Buyers report to the general public all of the necessary upkeep to make everyone aware that a product can be bad.
This is the whole reason behind "lemon laws" in many places. Someone buys a car for X, but has to spend 3X to keep it running, and if every buyer has the same experience, that shows the car is horrible for people to buy. And the lemon laws allow the buyer to cancel the purchase and get their money back.
Other questions: what is the neutral point for user reviews? Since no websites allow for a "zero" review, what shows the product has no inherent benefits? Giving a 1 star review actually (mathematically) shows benefit, and is a ludicrous way to interpret it.
This gives rise to the new "neutral" review being a 3 - and now 1 and 2 stars are "negatives", right? Again, that destroys the entire argument that there are no negative penalties. Edit Delete Reply ParentLink...
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points
ago (+0/-0) Anything is rated from 0 to 10. Not below 0. It's based on universal math logic. If you keep shitspamming with bullshit, you will be banned.
And on cue, the retarded niggerfaggot pajeet deletes the second comment because he can't win a debate with logic, and has none because he is retarded - see his comment in this thread - just a whiny rant of name calling with no solutions or logic, just a retard having a fit.
ago (+0/-0) Anything is rated from 0 to 10. Not below 0. It's based on universal math logic. If you keep shitspamming with bullshit, you will be banned.
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 5 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 13:29:21 ago (+5/-0)
Just color them yellow, to represent cowardice.
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 3 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 14:05:25 ago (+3/-0)*
https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=65eaf79229aac kikenigger crypost included. The yids seethe when their games get played against them.
[ + ] Crackinjokes
[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 15:03:22 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 16:03:28 ago (+1/-0)
Apparently the owners/mods of non-default subs can censor the shit out of those subs, and there is no way of knowing which subs are censored (to me anyway, just as a casual user). Knowing where to spend my energy would be very helpful.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 16:11:02 ago (+1/-0)
A larger font perhaps, or the indicator "default" etc, to allow users to post without fear of censorship.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 13:19:25 ago (+1/-0)
Of course, there is no guidance on which are default subs and which aren't.
There's also the double standard based on which users system responds to and "likes".
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 13:01:18 ago (+1/-0)
"Downvoting below zero is a math and logic fallacy because it defies how merit should be measured: through positive accumulation, not subtraction past a neutral point. In math, a tally—like votes—starts at zero and grows with support; you don’t dig into negatives to penalize, as that’s not a true count of value. "
You do know what a money pit is, right?
If you buy (or are LOL) a shitty product and have to spend more money to make that product actually work, that is a negative penalty - and totally destroys your argument.
Edit
Delete
Reply Link...
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points
ago (+0/-0)
I have no idea what you just said. Do you mind reposting in case you have problems to formulate your thoughts?
Reply ParentLink...
[ - ] localsal 0 points
ago (+0/-0)
Here's an example
Suppose all cars are the same price. In your thinking, with no negative penalty, how are the cars rated?
One of the ways that real products - like cars - are rated and reviewed is by how much it costs to keep the car running. Buyers report to the general public all of the necessary upkeep to make everyone aware that a product can be bad.
This is the whole reason behind "lemon laws" in many places. Someone buys a car for X, but has to spend 3X to keep it running, and if every buyer has the same experience, that shows the car is horrible for people to buy. And the lemon laws allow the buyer to cancel the purchase and get their money back.
Other questions: what is the neutral point for user reviews? Since no websites allow for a "zero" review, what shows the product has no inherent benefits? Giving a 1 star review actually (mathematically) shows benefit, and is a ludicrous way to interpret it.
This gives rise to the new "neutral" review being a 3 - and now 1 and 2 stars are "negatives", right? Again, that destroys the entire argument that there are no negative penalties.
Edit
Delete
Reply ParentLink...
[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points
ago (+0/-0)
Anything is rated from 0 to 10. Not below 0. It's based on universal math logic. If you keep shitspamming with bullshit, you will be banned.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 0 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 16:06:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal [op] 1 point 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 12:59:11 ago (+1/-0)
Universal
Community for : 3.2 years
Universal is for any kind of info, news or opinions if you are confused where to post.
Memes are welcome here.
Zero tolerance moderation.
Owner: Conspirologist
Mods:
Conspirologist
Sounds like "whatever" where anything can be posted, yet here is how the niggerfaggot kike behaves:
https://www.upgoat.net/viewpost?postid=67e813b525dfa
Conspirologist [op] 0 points
ago (+0/-0)
Anything is rated from 0 to 10. Not below 0. It's based on universal math logic. If you keep shitspamming with bullshit, you will be banned.
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist -3 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 14:16:29 ago (+0/-3)
Fuck off, nobody normal gives a fuck about you.
Shove your alts up your ass. Eat shit and die.
[ + ] dirtywhiteboy
[ - ] dirtywhiteboy 3 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 14:24:27 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 15:32:01 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Conspirologist
[ - ] Conspirologist -2 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 16:05:35 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 2 monthsMar 29, 2025 18:00:12 ago (+2/-0)