If one was to read such works as "The Doctorine of Fascism", it would become OBVIOUS what the difference between NATSOC and Fascism is. They are NOT the same at all.
Comparing this to "The Communist Manifesto" on the other hand ... it's hard to tell the difference. Other than the concept of "capitolism" sprinkled in, they are almost identical.
First published September 14, 2017 As usual, this is just my opinion, arrived at from internet research anyone can do. . . but doesn't.
Say you were one of my regular readers who had read all my papers and I told you Mussolini was not who we have been told. And say I gave you one guess to tell me who he really was. What would you guess? YOU: let's see, let me think. . . a gay Jewish actor who faked his death? Bravo. Excellent guess. Completely logical. Now let's see the evidence.
Well, the first evidence you have already collated in forming your guess: if almost every other famous person we have studied previously has turned out to be a gay Jewish actor who faked his/her death, then the odds are very good that the next famous person we study will be the same. It is called probability math.
------------------------------
a gay Jewish actor who faked his death
Just like John Lennon and Kurt Cobain. Oh yes, and JFK! Hahahahqa
Well, the first evidence you have already collated in forming your guess: if almost every other famous person we have studied previously has turned out to be a gay Jewish actor who faked his/her death, then the odds are very good that the next famous person we study will be the same. It is called probability math.
So, anyone I've heard of is a gay jewish actor who faked his death. Not sound logic, perhaps MOST OF THE TIME it will be accurate but is not a method to sift out the truth.
Here's a better quote:
Readers can be divided into three groups: Those who believe everything they read; those who no longer believe anything they read; and those minds which critically examine what they read and then form their own judgments about the accuracy of the information.
Can you guess who wrote this (although this is a translation)?
What you see with miles mathis is one who waffles between the "first" and "second" types but claims to be the "third". The key in this is in VALIDATION of evidence and learning to REJECT at the same time as not making more than an INFERENCE.
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 4 weeksApr 6, 2025 13:58:00 ago (+0/-0)
https://archive.org/download/mussolini-archive/The%20Doctrine%20of%20Fascism%20Benito%20Mussolini.pdf
Comparing this to "The Communist Manifesto" on the other hand ... it's hard to tell the difference. Other than the concept of "capitolism" sprinkled in, they are almost identical.
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic 0 points 4 weeksApr 6, 2025 13:51:00 ago (+0/-0)
First published September 14, 2017
As usual, this is just my opinion, arrived at from internet research anyone can do. . . but doesn't.
Say you were one of my regular readers who had read all my papers and I told you Mussolini was not who we have been told. And say I gave you one guess to tell me who he really was. What would you guess? YOU: let's see, let me think. . . a gay Jewish actor who faked his death? Bravo. Excellent guess. Completely logical. Now let's see the evidence.
Well, the first evidence you have already collated in forming your guess: if almost every other famous
person we have studied previously has turned out to be a gay Jewish actor who faked his/her death, then the odds are very good that the next famous person we study will be the same. It is called probability math.
------------------------------
Just like John Lennon and Kurt Cobain. Oh yes, and JFK! Hahahahqa
- And here's the painfully long PDF: https://mileswmathis.com/benito.pdf
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 4 weeksApr 6, 2025 14:11:28 ago (+0/-0)
So, anyone I've heard of is a gay jewish actor who faked his death. Not sound logic, perhaps MOST OF THE TIME it will be accurate but is not a method to sift out the truth.
Here's a better quote:
Can you guess who wrote this (although this is a translation)?
What you see with miles mathis is one who waffles between the "first" and "second" types but claims to be the "third". The key in this is in VALIDATION of evidence and learning to REJECT at the same time as not making more than an INFERENCE.
[ + ] Panic
[ - ] Panic 0 points 4 weeksApr 6, 2025 14:39:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Dingo
[ - ] Dingo 0 points 4 weeksApr 6, 2025 14:43:37 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 0 points 4 weeksApr 6, 2025 05:17:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Kozel
[ - ] Kozel 3 points 1 monthApr 6, 2025 01:41:00 ago (+3/-0)