×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
4

TW SCOTUS Decides A Case And Proved Me Right.

submitted by FreeinTX to TellTalk 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 07:27:07 ago (+4/-0)     (www.newsweek.com)

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-sides-donald-trump-deportation-fight-2056586

Supreme Court Sides With Donald Trump in Deportation Fight

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday issued a ruling allowing the Trump administration to use the Alien Enemies Act to deport people from the U.S. but said they must get a court hearing before deportation.

I used a Newsweek link just to piss off Sal.


10 comments block


[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 07:28:04 ago (+0/-0)

The Supreme Court said in its unsigned majority opinion: "AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs."

It's called "due process" and yes, even illegals have a right to it.

[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 09:37:25 ago (+0/-0)

scalia proved that the supreme court is only as good as bought and paid for, constituton be damned

any law that is unconstitutional is NULL and VOID

to hell with what the supreme courruptness says

the constitution shall not be infringed is indelible and unequivocable

i dont give a fuck what any god damned tyrant says

if it is worth their life, it sure as hell is worth mine

if they threaten my life, they put theirs on the line

[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 1 point 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 09:42:17 ago (+1/-0)

The ruling was constitutional, fool.

"No person" means no person, not no citizen.

[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 09:54:37 ago (+0/-0)

semantics are for semites

[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 10:01:10 ago (+0/-0)

Law is nothing but semantics. The rule of law is 100% semantics.

[ - ] Sleazy 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 10:12:41 ago (+0/-0)

exactly

cannon rules

[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 10:59:00 ago (+0/-0)

Anarchy is not a Christian value.

[ - ] VitaminSieg 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 16:11:47 ago (+0/-0)

'Person' is a legal term. It doesn't mean 'man' or 'human being'. 'Person' is specifically a man with legal status. These are illegal people.

[ - ] FreeinTX [op] 0 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 16:46:17 ago (+0/-0)

No. Wrong. The word "person" is defined in virtually every code in US and each of the US state's law. Depending on the code, "person" may have different definitions. Mitt Romney once said that a "person" was a corporation, which is true in the business code, but not in the penal code. NONE are defined as you suggest. Forget, ya dumb faggot, the word being defined as you suggest would mean that any alleged criminal would no longer be a person. Fuckin' dumb. "Illegal person" would be babble. "Illegal man with legal status"? Fuckin' idiot.

For the Constitution, it uses the definition from Bouviers Law Dictionary and that reads as follows.

PERSON. This word is applied to men, women and children, who are called
natural persons. In law, man and person are not exactly synonymous terms.
Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever
may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a
man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the
rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it
imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137.
2. It is also used to denote a corporation which is an artificial
person. 1 Bl. Com. 123; 4 Bing. 669; C. 33 Eng. C. L R. 488; Woodes. Lect.
116; Bac. Us. 57; 1 Mod. 164.
3. But when the word "Persons" is spoken of in legislative acts,
natural persons will be intended, unless something appear in the context to
show that it applies to artificial persons. 1 Scam. R. 178.
4. Natural persons are divided into males, or men; and females or
women. Men are capable of all kinds of engagements and functions, unless by
reasons applying to particular individuals. Women cannot be appointed to any
public office, nor perform any civil functions, except those which the law
specially declares them capable of exercising. Civ. Code of Louis. art. 25.
5. They are also sometimes divided into free persons and slaves.
Freemen are those who have preserved their natural liberty, that is to say,
who have the right of doing what is not forbidden by the law. A slave is one
who is in the power of a master to whom he belongs. Slaves are sometimes
ranked not with persons but things. But sometimes they are considered as
persons for example, a negro is in contemplation of law a person, so as to
be capable of committing a riot in conjunction with white men. 1 Bay, 358.
Vide Man.
6. Persons are also divided into citizens, (q.v.) and aliens, (q.v.)
when viewed with regard to their political rights. When they are considered
in relation to their civil rights, they are living or civilly dead; vide
Civil Death; outlaws; and infamous persons.
7. Persons are divided into legitimates and bastards, when examined as
to their rights by birth.
8. When viewed in their domestic relations, they are divided into
parents and children; husbands and wives; guardians and wards; and masters
and servants son, as it is understood in law, see 1 Toull. n. 168; 1 Bouv.
Inst. n. 1890, note.

Even people who are here illegally are clearly "people" as used in the Constitution, which is why SOTUS just ruled that even those people being removed under this Act have a right to due process.

[ - ] big_fat_dangus 3 points 3 weeksApr 8, 2025 07:35:32 ago (+3/-0)