Sign into an existing account

dracula remake, independence day remake, ferris beuller remake, league of extraordinary gentleman remake.

some of the character's quotes are corny, but i think the scripts are pretty good.

more screenplays to come, perhaps...

You won't get a modern, surplus civilization from Negro gene pools.

That doesn't mean we don't love Negroes, but loving Negroes shouldn't mean granting them access to White females to mate with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tP7WCD_Sc0c

Harmful Jewish Tropes such as "all races are equal" and "diversity is our greatest strength" have been lies aimed at destroying Western Civilization by causing replacement-level migration.

We have to consider what kind of genes we want future America and future White people to be. We don't want future White people to be non-White, yet that's the path liberals and Jews have taken America.

We have to be responsible about gene pools/races, and not spread every non-White gene pool all over Western Civilization.

Negroes should never have access to White females. Non-Whites should not have a say, and it should not be controversial.

The bottom line is

Whites need to decide for themselves whether their genotype is precious or not.

Liberals and Jews say the White Genotype is not valuable and therefore should not be protected against massive genetic swamping of non-Whites, ie White Genocide.

Don't you think a race can die out if it is force integrated with another race in massive amounts?

We need politicians to be beholden to White Nationalism instead of to Zionism.

This book is just a list of black invention myths

Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2023

This seems to just be a list of black invention myths. Let's go through the example pages in the images.

First page:
Why couldn’t Timothy listen to music? Electronics, speakers, and even the only replicable musical notation were invented by white people, not black.
This seems to be insinuating that the elevator was invented by a black person, which is an oft repeated myth. Alexander Miles did not invent the elevator, he simply improved upon an existing automatic door closing mechanism (which hasn’t been used in elevators in well over a century).

Second page:
Frederick Jones did not invent the refrigerated truck in 1938, refrigerated trucks (as well as rail cars and shipping containers) had been in use for decades before this. He simply took an existing refrigeration unit and attached it to a truck, albeit in a new and useful way at the time. Jones was also half Irish and half black.

Third page:
I can’t read most of these, the image is too small. The one I am familiar with is the 2nd, Patricia Bath who many falsely claim invented cataract eye surgery. She developed, and named, a new method of cataract eye surgery that improved upon the current process that was in use for a decade.

Fourth page:
It seems Timothy still can’t listen to music because all he knows about is reggae and rap. This says pop but I have yet to see any argument how blacks invented pop music.

Fifth page:
Alexander Miles again, refer back to my comments on the first page.
Frederick Jones, again refer to my comments on the 2nd page. I also find it interesting they drew him extremely dark, he was only half black and was light skinned if you see an actual photograph of him.
Osbourn Dorsey improved upon an existing doornob, but did not invent the first one ever.
Phillip Downing improved upon an existing mailbox, but he did not invent the mailbox.
Thomas Stewart got a patent on a mop with a clamp, but it was hardly the first or the best mop patented at the time.
Richard Spikes was not the first to invent turn signals, he had a patent that was used once on one car. He did not invent the automatic gear shift, those had been around for nearly 30 years already, as had automatic brakes.
Garret Morgan did not invent traffic signals, those had been invented for 50 years. His traffic signal was simply a cross shape where the side pieces could be raised by someone pulling on a rope. It was never used anywhere and obsolete before he ever patented it.

This entire book seems to just be the author’s inability to understand that just because someone holds a patent for something doesn’t mean they invented the first iteration of whatever it is. I could come up with a new spoke design for a wheel and get it patented but that doesn’t mean I am the inventor of the wheel.

The question about this book is this: did the author write it not knowing these were all wrong? In which case she (and the editors and publisher) should be ashamed of how little effort fact checking they did. Or did they know they were wrong and publish anyways? If so, are they just doing it for the money? Or for propaganda?