Sign into an existing account

Trying to figure out what to do about this guy.
He’s been coming around about once every month or two.
He'll either be out in the parking lot, yelling about some shit, or, he’ll come into our store.
He usually comes in hollering about something, makes his way up to the counter and grabs a few candies out of the dish on the counter, yells about some shit and then we push him out of the store.
The nigger police know him very well.
He’s never been physically violent, but I’m just fed up with his shit.
I don’t believe in putting a beating on someone who hasn’t been a threat, but I’m about tired of his shit.
What say you?
@Peckerwoodperry

CMV: Jews have no legitimate claim to the land of modern day Israel. A two-state solution is already a major concession made by the Palestinians.

Delta(s) from OP
After reading about the Israel-Palestine conflict, I was shocked at how rarely people point out the flawed logic behind pro-Israel arguments. I do not believe Jews have a meaningful claim to the land of Israel, and a "Jewish state" should have never been established in the region. I will be debunking common arguments for a Jewish state of Israel below, and will gladly respond to any others that are brought up to this post.

The Jews deserve a homeland because centuries of history have shown their safety is never guaranteed in non-Jewish countries.
I agree, Jews have every right to establish their own country so they do not have to worry about being a persecuted minority. However, Jews do not have a right to establish a Jewish state over a region that is already inhabited by non-Jewish people. If the principal concern is establishing a country where Jews can be safe, why does it have to be established in a region that is majority Muslim? There are other regions of the world with unoccupied land, but Jews insist their nation be established over the historic land of Israel. In this case, the "Jews just want a homeland" is a red herring to avoid the issue of a Jewish state being established over a region occupied by Arabs for centuries.

2) Jews legally bought land in Palestine in the 19th and 20th centuries.

Yes, Jews legally bought land during both the Ottoman and British administration of the region. However, these were regarding private ownership of the land, which is different from sovereignty of the land. Many Chinese people buy real estate in Vancouver, but it does not mean Chinese people buy the sovereignty of Vancouver. The land is still legally the territory of Canada, Chinese people cannot establish a "Chinese state" because they bought real estate in Vancouver. Therefore, Jews legally buying land in Palestine does not mean it gives them the right to establish a Jewish state on that land.

3) Jews earned the right to establish a Jewish state in Israel after it negotiated the Balfour Declaration from Britain.

This was a colonial era document. If you think colonial territory agreements should be maintained, then you are against the independence of Korea, Vietnam, India, etc. The British should have never made such promises on the first place, especially considering they made overlapping promises to the Arabs in the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence. A similar argument is that Jews earned the land after winning a war instigated by an Arab coalition. This is right by conquest, which has no longer been recognized by international law since the resolution of WW2.

4) Jews made better use of their land than the original Ottoman/Arab landowners. "Israelis like to build, Arabs like to bomb and..." Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, where gay people can have their relationship legally recognized.

People bring up these points because they believe Israelis have made "better use" of the land than their Palestinian Arabs counterparts, therefore Jews deserve the land. This is not how sovereignty works. Imperial Japan was famous for using this argument to justify the annexing/colonization of Okinawa/Taiwan/Manchuria/Korea/etc. This was almost universally condemned, and Imperial Japan is nothing more than two mushroom clouds over the ash heap of history. Even if Japan made greater crop yields/repealed some antiquated practices/provided industrial living conditions to these colonies, doesn't change the fact they were occupying land and people against their will.

5) Arabs live much more peaceful and prosperous lives in Israel, compared to life in Palestine. Israel grants equal rights to it's Arab citizens, many of which are part of the Israeli government.

Just because you give equal rights to Palestinian Arabs doesn't mean you are entitled to their land. By this logic, US can annex even more of Mexico, so long as it offers the Mexicans in the region full US citizenship. It also doesn't solve the issue that the Arabs cannot truly be equals when a Jewish state occupies a majority Muslim region. If you believe in truly equality, you would not need to enshrine Israel as a "Jewish state," this is just to hedge against the fact the region of Palestine is majority Arab Muslims.

6) Jews were the original inhabitants of the region, Jews have maintained a continuous presence in the region of Israel throughout history.

Regardless of who the original inhabitants of the region were, the majority of the region has been inhabited by Arab Muslims for the past few centuries. If you believe being the original inhabitants entitles you to the land forever, does that mean the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand have to return the land to the indigenous population? These indigenous groups were displaced within the past 5 centuries, with some regions still being majority indigenous until the past 2 centuries, whereas Jews did not administer the region for over a millennium. I understand this is a very serious part of your identity, with the name "Palestine" already being a huge scar in your ethnic history, but we cannot undo these tragic events in your history. America is named after an Italian explorer, our capital is named after a colonizer and a slaveowner. The Jews are not the only ones who have historical trauma.

7) There was no such thing as a "Palestinian" identity until recently, they were just Arabs. Arabs have 22 countries, why can't they accept there being one Jewish state?

Most serious people are not saying there cannot be a Jewish state. They are merely arguing that you cannot establish a Jewish state over land that is already inhabited by Arabs. Just because Arabs have a lot of land, doesn't mean you are entitled to some of their land. By this logic, Korea is entitled to some of China's land, Bangladesh is entitled to some of India's land, and Mongolia is entitled to some of Russia's land. It doesn't matter whether the Arabs considered themselves distinctly Palestinian, they are not Jewish and do not want to be under a Jewish state.

8) Israel has always been willing to give concessions for peace, but the Palestinians always reject peace treaties.

From the very start, these peace proposals have been favored towards Israel. The 1947 borders gave the Jewish minority sovereignty over the majority of land in the region. Other sore spots include Israel wanting sovereignty over East Jerusalem, and Israel wanting their borders to encompass areas with arable land and water sources. A two state solution is already a large concession for the Palestinans to make, Israel should offer more concessions.

9) Israel wants peace, but the Palestinians choose terrorism. Israel has no choice but to make "hard decisions" for its own security. The Arab League/Muslim Brotherhood/Iran all want us blown off the map.

Palestinians had no interest in being under a Jewish state, yet it was imposed against their will. It is not unlike the Macabbeans, who revolted against their Seleucid occupiers. You can't occupy/displace people and then be shocked when they fight back. Israel is not a perfect victim, it exacerbated the problem when it bankrolled extremists groups in Palestine in order to destabilize the opposition. While I acknowledge Israel has legitimate security concerns from hostile neighbors, what did you expect when you displaced Muslims to establish a Jewish state in a region dominated by Muslims?

Ideally, the region of Palestine should have been one state, where the rights of the Jewish minority would be enshrined in its constitution. Ultimately, I recognize that Israel has existed for almost 75 years, and at this point the one-state solution is no longer viable. Most of the world has made the right steps in accepting Israel as a member of the world. I wrote this post because I wanted to point out that the framework of the two state solution should have never been used in the first place, and the two state solution is the consequence of the UN's failure to objectively solve the problem in 1947.

Some (most) dumb cunts never learn. I’ve always been confused as to whether she was a victim or a volunteer. And innocent intern or a slut.
Now I know, she’s a fucking slut. Sucked off Slick Willie as well as storing his cigars.

Jews

Most of the site is about Jews. The core idea is that Jews are fundamentally opposed to all other peoples, with a special hatred for Christians. When we talk about “The Jews,” we are talking about a collective, rather than individuals. There may be individual Jews who disagree with each other, and there may even be Jews who disagree with the Jewish collective, but on the whole, Jews will always ask “what’s good for the Jews,” and they will put their own interests above everyone else’s.

Clearly, any group of people should put its interests first, and every group does that other than whites. The Jews are particular, however, because they have always lived amongst other people, without their own labor force or military, and thus their interests have always involved exploiting other people to take things from them. Finally, after the second world war, they got a country, but the country itself functions as a parasite on the rest of the world.

Furthermore, Jews have perverse, neurotic tendencies, which relate to a desire to weaken the people they live amongst. One simply has to look at the way the United States funnels cash to Israel to see how this works. If the United States was an educated, healthy, moral country, no one would stand for this practice of transferring money to Israel, of committing to all of these wars in its name, but because the United States is a broken, sickening nation of fat slobs with very low morality, no one is willing to take a stand on anything. Many Americans are so fat and stupid they think Israel is good.

The reason Jews are like this is genetic. Behavior is usually genetic. Jews wanted to deliberately remain separate from the people they lived among. The Jewish religion preaches that Jews are chosen by their god because of their bloodline, that they are superior to everyone else, and they therefore must manipulate and control those whose labor they feed on. That’s literally what the religion says, it’s not something that’s up for debate. In a longer form, I would take the time to cite some sources, but it’s not a question. The question is what are the results of such a religion, and the answer to that is that you breed very specific types of individuals.

If you think about America and all of the European groups coming here, none of them kept to their own in this way, at least not deliberately, over many generations. In general, people feel closer to people who are genetically similar to them. This is a part of race, which I will summarize below, so people do often tend to breed with people from a similar ethnic background. However, for most peoples, this sort of slowly falls away. As groups live together and speak the same language, they will begin mixing, particularly if they are not visibly much different than one another. There are still groups of Irish and Italians on the East Coast, but in the rest of the country, not so much. If it does exist, it’s like my personal situation where my parents were not thinking about their Irishness but subconsciously were attracted to each other for that reason (Irish men and women look for someone who is into abuse).

However, America is not that old. The Jews have been doing this “separation” thing for two thousand years. Jewish culture is totally satanic and bizarre, and fixated on abuse. The things these people do are grotesque, and they are completely miserable. So, for two thousand years, Jews who lived in that culture had the option of just leaving. Any individual Jew who didn’t like that culture and didn’t want to be a part of it could have simply left, gotten baptized, married a Christian woman. And many of them did throughout history. But what happens then is the ones that don’t leave continue to breed with one another and strengthen the racial characteristics of a group of people who enjoys being a loathsome parasite, enjoys taking part in a religion that celebrates the murder of Christ and preaches that all other people on earth are “human animals.” The Jews purified their blood in this manner, creating a race of super parasites.

I recall in my childhood and even in my early years of voting, circa 1988, that we all went to our local polling place. Once there, someone checked our ID, like seriously checked it, matching it to a list they had. Then, we punched cards and inserted them in a machine, then left. Very few people got “absentee ballots”. Remember those? Only a few people got them. I got them as I got older, because I didn’t have time to stand in a line and talk to my neighbors who were dicks. In retrospect, I should have seen this as the red herring it was.

After this voting process, we'd go home and go to bed, or stay up and watch some late night crap about the voting. In the morning, we woke to the results. The results were just that. It was over. You got what you got.

I’ve yet to hear someone explain just exactly how this mechanical voting was tallied up overnight, yet weeks of early mail in voting takes even more weeks to count. I understand that we are getting dumber and lamer, much more gayer and fat as a people and society, but I’ve yet to see an explanation for this. The only rational conclusion is that we’re getting fucked by this mail in crap and they’ve been happily pushing it in order to cheat. Both sides.

This is why I’m out.

Except, he should have said “fag”