Sign into an existing account

This is the niggeriest thing I've heard in a long time

https://dleasweets.com/

Try them if you can find them in the States...

https://files.catbox.moe/3vcfzu.jpg
It was $8

[Flanders note]: Bill had TRIED to warn the American people. These satanic jew "laws", "passed by the "US" Congress", are intended for ALL non-jews, whether the people are religious or are not, They apply to athiests, agnostics, Catholic, Hindu, Mormon, and Christian [including that deluded sect which identifies themselves as "Zionists"]. The jews are deadly serious....
---------
---------


"NOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN LEGALLY KILL CHRISTIANS"

[by Bill Dannemeyer, U.S. Congressman, 1979-1992 ]
Bill had TRIED to warn the American people.

[SOURCE]:
http://www.spingola.com/Dannemeyer.html

[Excerpts only are below]:
----
On March 5, 1991, in the House of Representatives, and March 7, 1991, in the U.S. Senate, without any knowledge of, or input by, the people of the United States, U.S. Senators and Congressmen passed a law that is so outrageous – and frankly unconstitutional – that it forces the American people to be bound by a set of monstrous rules, called the Noahide Laws, rules that make the belief in Jesus Christ a crime punishable by decapitation by guillotine! On March 20, 1991, President George H.W. Bush, a supposed Christian, signed the bill into law.
----
"HJ Res. 104:
102nd CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 104
JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.'."

"NOAHIDE LAW

Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991;"
----
"The committee referred this Resolution to the House for a vote on March 5, 1991. But here is where the real treachery begins! The record states that the House of Representatives passed this Resolution by “Unanimous Consent.” But what the average American does not know is that “Unanimous Consent” is a euphemism for getting a bill passed “under the radar” with almost NO ONE present to vote AND with NO RECORD of who voted or HOW they voted."
----
"On the day this Resolution was “passed,” the entire membership of the House of Representatives had already been dismissed after having been told that the day’s work, including all the voting, was over. We could all go home. It was THEN, after virtually ALL members had left, that the traitorous authors of this Resolution brought it up for a vote on the House floor – with only four hand-picked members present. It was then deceitfully “passed” by “Unanimous Consent” on March 5, 1991, by voice vote with almost NO ONE there and NO RECORD made of their names or how they voted. Two days later, on March 7 1991, the U.S. Senate passed the Resolution by voice vote, also with no recorded vote. On March 20, 1991, it was signed by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law 102-14."

"Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object. And because no one objected, passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution. By design there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did."
----
"Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do. A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this. “He who has the gold – rules!”

Stephen Sizer, author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:

“The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US yet it is already the largest and most powerful. The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’. Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda’ and to express ‘the truth about Israel’. The UCFI includes three of the largest Christian Zionist organizations: Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and Christians for Israel.

This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides. Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’ According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’. Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (page 215)"

"Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:
-----
"But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution. This is how it occurred:

Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res. 104. Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object, but did not object. If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent. Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY). Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel. It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.

After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found. From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed! At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995-2001). But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003-2005). After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event."

Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer. There was no objection.

30.16 EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A.
On motion of Mr. Sawyer, by unanimous consent, the Committee on Post Office and Civil service was discharged from further consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) to designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, U.S. A.”
When said joint resolution was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said joint resolution was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said joint resolution.

Their total remarks consumed no more than four or five minutes and there was not even a mention of the Seven Noahide Laws. For the balance of the early evening these routine non-controversial items were considered by the “House” with only these four members present."
----
"A Jewish website, www.NoahideNations.com, states that the worship of any deity other than God, which includes Jesus Christ, is idolatry. The penalty for idolatry is decapitation.

Moses Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon 1138-1204) is recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher. Maimonides’ Mishnah Torah, Chapter 10 of the English translation, states concerning Jesus Christ:

“It is a mitzvah (religious command or duty), however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minim (Gentiles = non-Jews), and apikorsim (secular Jews), and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot.” Sanh.57A of the Talmud states the penalty for disobedience, with these words:

“One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”

[THIS SOURCE]:
http://www.spingola.com/Dannemeyer.html

The "End of 10" website is a cooperative effort to let people know that they have other options besides buying a new computer. The site seems to be Europe -oriented, but you can check it out. We need a similar site for Americans.

https://endof10.org/

The 14th Amendment first used against White people is now used against everyone in America to dilute the power of our country and people, by the same ones for which our constitution was designed to protect against, by limiting and prohibiting their globalist actions.

Universal equality is a myth being used against all our people by a government under the control of globalists, and the international jewish networks spread worldwide, their most active and ardent supporters, who are led and directed by jewish international-global financiers.
-----

"Real Reason for the 14th Amendment"
Albert V. Burns

Last week we discussed the incredible manner through which the 14th Amendment was maneuvered into the Constitution. The ostensible reason why the Republican radicals worked so hard to get the 14th Amendment to the Constitution declared as ratified (however spurious that ratification might be) was to guarantee the freedom and rights of former slaves. However, history has shown that to have been of negligible concern to those in power.

It is interesting to note that Alexis DeToqueville, in his book "Democracy In America," published in 1835, wrote that racial prejudice was stronger in the North than in the South. He stated: "The prejudice of race appears to be stronger in the states that have abolished slavery than in those where it still exists." Northern states enacted discriminatory "black codes" long before they came into being in ANY southern state. Illinois, in 1848, Oregon, in 1857, Indiana, in 1862, all had laws severely restricting the rights of blacks and mulattos who were not allowed to enter into legal contracts, could not testify in court against whites, were not allowed to immigrate, legally, into these states or if they did come in had to post a $1000 bond to guarantee that they would behave "properly."

Other northern states and cities had similar laws. Northern newspapers such as the Philadelphia Daily News, the Daily Chicago Times, and even the New York Times were printing blatantly racist editorials. Some of the radical legislators in Congress who forced through the 14th Amendment had previously supported the discriminatory laws in their own home states. No, Southern racism was NOT the primary reason for the 14th Amendment!

Almost as soon as the ink was dry on the document declaring that the 14th Amendment was officially a part of the Constitution, efforts began to be made to use Section 1, of the amendment, as a weapon to destroy the rights of the individual states or the citizens therein.

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

As previously stated, the Constitution was designed to regulate the power and activities of the FEDERAL government. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to further spell out the activities which the FEDERAL government could NOT DO! Amendments 9 and 10 were deliberately added to PROTECT the States and their affairs FROM interference by the federal government. For instance, it was universally recognized that while Congress could NOT make any law respecting the establishment of religion, several of the individual STATES which ratified the Constitution AND the Bill of Rights DID have established STATE religions.

With the addition of the 14th Amendment, groups and individuals began to file cases in federal courts claiming that this amendment GAVE the federal government AUTHORITY to supervise the activities of both state and local governments ‑ an exact REVERSAL of the original intent of the Founding Fathers. The first case which advanced this doctrine reached the Supreme Court in 1873. That Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment did NOT grant such authority to the federal government.

There was a clear intent in succeeding years to transform our "federal" system into a "centralized" government system by transferring all rights and powers of the individual States to Washington. Those who wanted to achieve this result kept bringing cases attacking states rights to the Supreme Court in an effort to get the Court to change its position on this vital point. According to a study called "The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation: Annotations of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the United States to June 30, 1952," also known as Senate Document No. 170, the position of the Court began to weaken at the beginning of the 1900s, and by the 1930s the Supreme Court had begun to, tentatively, assume jurisdiction under the 14th Amendment to act as "censor upon...legislation of the States."

With the appointment of Earl Warren as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by Dwight Eisenhower, the Court began to simply USURP power under the "equal protection" phrase of the 14th Amendment, to do ANYTHING desired by a majority of the Court. The "equal protection" doctrine has been used by the Court to impose FEDERAL mandates upon the States in such areas as education, voting rights, abortion, religious instruction, labor disputes, and the list goes on and on. Precisely the kind of judicial tyranny which Thomas Jefferson warned of when he described federal judges as those who would be "constantly working underground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric."

https://israelect.com/reference/WillieMartin/14th%20Amendment%20[A].htm